James Duckworth and Chak Lam Coleman Wong will play each other in the final of the Playford Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 11:00 am on CENTER COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is James Duckworth who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, James Duckworth is the pick to win this match.
James Duckworth -> 1.22
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 4.05
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head James Duckworth vs. Chak Lam Coleman Wong
This will be the 2nd time that James Duckworth and Chak Lam Coleman Wong square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Duckworth (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they played, Duckworth won 6-0 6-1 in the final in the Shenzhen 2 Challenger back in October 2023.
James Duckworth
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23-13 | 16-8 | 2-3 | 5-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 51-28 | 43-21 | 1-3 | 5-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-27 | 20-18 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 4-6 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 36-24 | 15-9 | 1-2 | 12-9 | 8-4 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 11-10 | 9-4 | 1-2 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 125, the Australian reached the final after beating Kaichi Uchida 6-4 7-62, Philip Sekulic 7-5 6-1, Hiroki Moriya 4-6 6-2 6-4 and Rinky Hijikata 4-6 7-5 6-1.
In the semifinal against Hijikata, The Australian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-5 6-1). During the match, Duckworth scored 103 points vs Hijikata’s 82. James was very aggressive to blast 44 winners.
Talking about the service games, Duckworth scored just 1 ace in the course of the match and he committed only 2 double faults. James Duckworth lost the serve 5 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Duckworth put 76% of his first serves in, winning 62% (44/71) of the points behind his 1st serve and 55% (12/22) on the 2nd serve. James broke Hijikata 7 times after converting 44% of his break points (7/16).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Australian has surrendered 2 set in this event to conquer 55% of the points he played.
Duckworth has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 60% of his matches (300-198). 41-21 on hard in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Duckworth has a composed 208-121 match record in the last years on hard.
His best result of the season was conquering the title the Shenzhen 2 Challenger where he defeated Chak Lam Coleman Wong in the final 6-0 6-1.
James has a compiled 44-26 win-loss record in 2023, 41-21 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Playford Challenger
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 11-13 | 11-10 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 53-27 | 42-19 | 9-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-19 | 20-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-7 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 361 (career-high), Chak got to the final after beating Ajeet Rai 3-6 6-2 6-2, Thanasi Kokkinakis 7-61 2-0 ret., Tristan Schoolkate 6-77 7-63 7-62 and Taro Daniel 4-6 7-65 7-5.
In the semifinal against Daniel, The recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-65 7-5).During the match Lam Coleman Wong scored less points (3) than Daniel. In fact, the world no. 125 won 109 points vs Daniel’s. That means that Lam Coleman Wong was more focused during the important points. Lam Coleman Wong was extremely aggressive to blast 42 winners.
Talking about serving, Lam Coleman Wong made 5 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Chak Lam Coleman Wong lost the serve 5 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Lam Coleman Wong put 51% of his first serves in, winning 76% (42/55) of the points behind his 1st serve and 40% (21/52) on the 2nd serve. Chak broke Daniel 5 times after converting 33% of his break points (5/15).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Lam Coleman Wong has conceded 3 set in the tournament to win 51% of the points he played.
The’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M15 Monastir,M25 Hong Kong,M15 Doha and the Shenzhen 2 Challenger.
Chak has an aggregate 48-23 win-loss record in 2023, 37-15 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Playford Challenger
The has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Duckworth | Lam Coleman Wong |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 4 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 10 | 12 |
| Tot Games | 99 | 114 |
| Pts | 330-268 | 377-351 |
| Total Points | 598 | 728 |
| Winners | 157 | 171 |
| %Winners | 48% | 45% |
Both Duckworth and Lam Coleman Wong played 4 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. James Duckworth surrendered 2 sets, while Chak Lam Coleman Wong surrendered 3 sets. Duckworth has played 2 set(s) less than Lam Coleman Wong (10 vs 12). Therefore, Duckworth played 15 games less than Lam Coleman Wong. James scored 157 winners (48% of the total points). On the other side, Lam Coleman Wong bagged 171 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Duckworth | Lam Coleman Wong |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 26 | 27 |
| Avg per match | 6.5 | 6.8 |
| 1st in | 221/299 | 228/367 |
| %1st in | 74% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 157/221 | 171/228 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 40/78 | 72/139 |
| %2nd pts | 51% | 52% |
Duckworth managed to score 26 aces (6.5 per match). Lam Coleman Wong blasted 27 aces (6.8 per match). Duckworth won 71% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 51% of the points. On the other side, Lam Coleman Wong won 75% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Duckworth | Lam Coleman Wong |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 19 | 12 |
| Converted | 19/41 | 12/32 |
| % Converted | 46% | 38% |
| Conceded | 26 | 23 |
| Saved | 16 | 15 |
| % Saved | 62% | 65% |
| Times Broken | 10 | 8 |
Duckworth broke his opponents 19 times with a 46% conversion rate. The Australian surrendered his serve 10 times and he saved 62% of the break points that he conceded. Chak broke his opponents 12 times with a 38% conversion rate. The conceded his serve 8 times and he saved 65% of the break points that he conceded.
| Duckworth | ||||||
| R1 Uchida |
R2 Sekulic |
1/4 Moriya |
1/2 Hijikata |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-62 | 7-5 6-1 | 4-6 6-2 6-4 | 4-6 7-5 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 10 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 19 | 28 | 29 | 99 | |
| pts | 78-73 | 64-39 | 85-74 | 103-82 | 330-268 | |
| Total points | 151 | 103 | 159 | 185 | 598 | |
| Winners | 43 | 25 | 45 | 44 | 157 | |
| %Winners | 55% | 39% | 53% | 43% | 48% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 11 | 6 | 8 | 1 | 26 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 61/89 | 30/44 | 59/73 | 71/93 | 221/299 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 68% | 81% | 76% | 74% | |
| 1st pts | 43/61 | 25/30 | 45/59 | 44/71 | 157/221 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 83% | 76% | 62% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/28 | 9/14 | 5/14 | 12/22 | 40/78 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 64% | 36% | 55% | 51% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 3 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 19 | |
| Converted | 3/9 | 5/8 | 4/8 | 7/16 | 19/41 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 63% | 50% | 44% | 46% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 1 | 6 | 9 | 26 | |
| Saved | 8/10 | 0/1 | 4/6 | 4/9 | 16 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 0% | 67% | 44% | 48% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 10 | |
| Lam Coleman Wong | ||||||
| R1 Rai |
R2 Kokkinakis |
1/4 Schoolkate |
1/2 Daniel |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-2 6-2 | 7-61 2-0 ret. | 6-77 7-63 7-62 | 4-6 7-65 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 11 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 15 | 39 | 35 | 114 | |
| pts | 90-77 | 44-33 | 134-129 | 109-112 | 377-351 | |
| Total points | 167 | 77 | 263 | 221 | 728 | |
| Winners | 37 | 22 | 70 | 42 | 171 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 50% | 52% | 39% | 45% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 8 | 3 | 11 | 5 | 27 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 53/75 | 25/40 | 95/145 | 55/107 | 228/367 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 63% | 66% | 51% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 37/53 | 22/25 | 70/95 | 42/55 | 171/228 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 88% | 74% | 76% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/22 | 10/15 | 27/50 | 21/52 | 72/139 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 67% | 54% | 40% | 52% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 4 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 12 | |
| Converted | 4/12 | 1/1 | 2/4 | 5/15 | 12/32 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 100% | 50% | 33% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 0 | 10 | 9 | 23 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 0/0 | 8/10 | 4/9 | 15 | |
| Saved % | 75% | – | 80% | 44% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 8 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWWLWWLW
LLLLWLWLWW 
