Daniel Cukierman and Mirza Basic will square off in the qualifications of the Ortisei Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 3:00 pm on COURT 1. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mirza Basic who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Mirza Basic is the pick to win this match.
Mirza Basic -> 1.72
Daniel Cukierman -> 2.04
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Daniel Cukierman vs. Mirza Basic
There is no head to head record between Daniel Cukierman and Mirza Basic since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Daniel Cukierman
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 21-18 | 5-5 | 16-11 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 34-25 | 17-11 | 6-5 | 11-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 49-28 | 39-14 | 5-7 | 5-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-13 | 3-4 | 20-8 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 16-7 | 9-6 | 1-0 | 6-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 365, the Israeli got to the qualifications after beating Pietro Orlando Fellin 6-4 7-63.
In the qualifications, Cukierman had a good straight sets win against Orlando Fellin (6-4 7-63). During the match, Cukierman and Orlando Fellin scored the same amount of points (). However, the world no. 365 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. Cukierman was not very aggressive to strike just winners.
Regarding the service games, Cukierman couldn’t to score even 1 ace during the match and he was quite solid in conceding no double faults. Daniel Cukierman conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 0% of his first serves in, win 0% (0) of the points behind his 1st serve and 0% (0) on the 2nd serve.
Cukierman has a solid win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 63% of his matches (195-116). 11-7 on indoor hard courts in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Cukierman has a compiled23-17 win-loss record in the last 8 years on indoor hard courts.
The Israeli’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M25 Gurb.
The Israeli has a compiled 34-23 win-loss record in 2023, 11-7 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Ortisei Challenger
Daniel has never competed in this tournament before.
Mirza Basic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 31-22 | 4-6 | 21-13 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 28-19 | 0-1 | 23-12 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 17-29 | 1-6 | 6-11 | 8-9 | 1-2 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 37-27 | 9-7 | 17-13 | 10-5 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
| 2020 | 8-6 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 603, Mirza got to the qualifications after beating Elliot Benchetrit 3-6 6-0 6-3.
In the qualifications against Benchetrit, The Bosnian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-0 6-3). During the match Basic and Benchetrit scored the same amount of points (). However, the world no. 365 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. Basic was not very aggressive do strike just winners.
About the serving games, Basic couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he was pretty solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Mirza Basic conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 0% of his first serves in, win 0% (/) of the points behind his 1st serve and 0% (/) on the 2nd serve.
Basic’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M15 Krsko.
Basic has an aggregate 26-17 win-loss record in 2023, 3-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Ortisei Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the semifinal in 2021. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Cukierman | Basic |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 23 | 24 |
| Pts | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Total Points | 0 | 0 |
| Winners | 0 | 0 |
| %Winners | 0% | 0% |
Both Cukierman and Basic played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Mirza Basic conceded 1 set while Daniel Cukierman hasn’t dropped a set so far. Cukierman has played 1 set(s) less than Basic (2 vs 3). Therefore, Cukierman played 1 game less than Basic. The Israeli scored 0 winners (0% of the total points). On the other side, Mirza fired 0 winners (0%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Cukierman | Basic |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 0 |
| 1st in | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| %1st in | 0% | 0% |
| 1st pts | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| %1st pts | 0% | 0% |
| 2nd pts | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| %2nd pts | 0% | 0% |
Cukierman didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Basic also didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Cukierman won 0% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 0% of the points. On the other side, Basic won 0% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 0% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Cukierman | Basic |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 0 | 0 |
| Converted | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| % Converted | 0% | 0% |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 |
| Saved | 0 | 0 |
| % Saved | 0% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
The Israeli hasn’t manged yet to break his opponent. He didn’t manage to even clinch a single break point. Daniel extremely effective on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points without even conceding a single break point. On the other side, Mirza hasn’t manged yet to break his opponent. He didn’t manage to even clinch a single break point. Mirza was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points without even conceding a single break point.
| Cukierman | |||
| Q1 Orlando |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | – | 0-0 | |
| Total points | 0 | 0 | |
| Winners | 0 | ||
| %Winners | 0% | 0% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | ||
| 1st in | / | 0/0 | |
| % 1st in | 0% | 0% | |
| 1st pts | / | 0/0 | |
| % 1st pts | 0% | % | |
| 2nd pts | / | 0/0 | |
| % 2nd pts | 0% | 0% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 0 | ||
| Converted | / | 0/0 | |
| Converted % | 0% | 0% | |
| Conceded | 0 | ||
| Saved | 0/ | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | ||
| Basic | |||
| Q1 Benchetrit |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-0 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 24 | 24 | |
| pts | – | 0-0 | |
| Total points | 0 | 0 | |
| Winners | 0 | ||
| %Winners | 0% | 0% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | ||
| 1st in | / | 0/0 | |
| % 1st in | 0% | 0% | |
| 1st pts | / | 0/0 | |
| % 1st pts | 0% | 0% | |
| 2nd pts | / | 0/0 | |
| % 2nd pts | 0% | 0% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 0 | ||
| Converted | / | 0/0 | |
| Converted % | 0% | 0% | |
| Conceded | 0 | ||
| Saved | 0/ | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | ||
Head 2 Head
LLWLWLWWWW
LLWWWWLWWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Illya MarchenkoMarchenko – Lorenzo RottoliRottoli (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian NeuchristNeuchrist – Federico GaioGaio (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Mathias BourgueBourgue – Joao SousaSousa (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Billy HarrisHarris – Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael GeertsGeerts – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel CukiermanCukierman – Mirza BasicBasic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Luca GiacominiGiacomini – Ryuki MatsudaMatsuda (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrik RiklRikl – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lukas KleinKlein – Andrea PicchionePicchione (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco FortiForti – Norbert GombosGombos (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli – Antoine BellierBellier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefano D’AgostinoD’Agostino – Ryan NijboerNijboer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
