-vs.-Patricia-Maria-Tig-CJTIaJ9eQg.jpg "Prediction And Head To Head Ekaterina Makarova (1996) Vs. Patricia Maria Tig Cjtiaj9eqg")
Ekaterina Makarova (1996) and Patricia Maria Tig will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Transylvania Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 8:00 pm on Center Court. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Ekaterina Makarova (1996) who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Ekaterina Makarova (1996) is the pick to win this match.
Ekaterina Makarova (1996) -> 1.74
Patricia Maria Tig -> 2.09
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Ekaterina Makarova (1996) vs. Patricia Maria Tig
There is no head to head record between Ekaterina Makarova (1996) and Patricia Maria Tig since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 32-38 | 3-10 | 29-24 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 0-1 |
| 2023 | 57-37 | 14-8 | 38-24 | 5-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 45-32 | 9-7 | 31-14 | 5-9 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 38-31 | 6-3 | 22-19 | 8-8 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2020 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 213, the Russian reached the 2nd round after beating Briana Szabo 6-3 6-3, Susan Bandecchi 7-5 7-5 and Kateryna Baindl 6-3 1-6 6-1.
In the 1st round, Ekaterina defeated Kozlova (6-3 1-6 6-1). During the match, Makarova (1996) scored 94 points vs Kozlova’s 83. Ekaterina was exceptionally aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Regarding the service games, Makarova (1996) was unable to score even 1 ace in the match and she committed only 3 double faults. Ekaterina Makarova (1996) lost the serve 6 times and she saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Makarova (1996) put 73% of her first serves in, winning 49% (26/53) of the points behind her 1st serve and 50% (10/20) on the 2nd serve. Ekaterina broke Kozlova 8 times after converting 38% of her break points (8/21).
Makarova (1996) has a winning win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 58% of her matches (190-138). 4-2 on indoor hard courts in 2023. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Makarova (1996) has an aggregate26-26 match record in the last 6 years on indoor hard courts.
Her best result of the season was winning the title the W25 Slobozia where she beat Lucija Ciric Bagaric in the final 5-7 6-4 7-5.
Makarova (1996) has a composed 42-29 win-loss record in 2023, 4-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Cluj-Napoca
Makarova (1996) has never competed in this tournament before.
.jpg)
Patricia Maria Tig
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 63-17 | 1-2 | 53-12 | 9-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 9-16 | 2-6 | 4-5 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 18-4 | 0-0 | 18-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 4-11 | 2-5 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 19-8 | 12-5 | 7-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 462, Maria Tig reached the 2nd round after beating Martha Matoula 6-4 6-75 6-3.
In the 1st round, Maria Tig defeated Matoula (6-4 6-75 6-3). During the match Maria Tig scored 119 points vs Matoula’s 110. Patricia was pretty aggressive to blast 46 winners.
About the serving games, Maria Tig scored just 1 ace during the entire match and she was not very steady on her 2nd serve to score 14 double faults. Patricia Maria Tig lost the serve 7 times and she saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Maria Tig put 61% of her first serves in, winning 66% (46/70) of the points behind her 1st serve and 33% (15/45) on the 2nd serve. Maria Tig broke Matoula 10 times after converting 56% of her break points (10/18).
Patricia has an aggregate 9-12 win-loss record in 2023, 3-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Makarova (1996) | Maria Tig |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 7 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 65 | 32 |
| Pts | 235-200 | 119-110 |
| Total Points | 435 | 229 |
| Winners | 84 | 46 |
| %Winners | 36% | 39% |
Makarova (1996) played 3 matches while Maria Tig competed in 1 match. Makarova (1996) started her run from the qualifications while Maria Tig had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Ekaterina Makarova (1996) surrendered 1 set, while Patricia Maria Tig lost 1 set. Makarova (1996) has played 4 sets more than Maria Tig (7 vs 3). Therefore, Makarova (1996) played 33 games more than Maria Tig. The Russian scored 84 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, Patricia fired 46 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Makarova (1996) | Maria Tig |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 0.7 | 1 |
| 1st in | 136/196 | 70/115 |
| %1st in | 69% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 84/136 | 46/70 |
| %1st pts | 62% | 66% |
| 2nd pts | 26/60 | 15/45 |
| %2nd pts | 43% | 33% |
Makarova (1996) blasted 2 aces (0.7 per match). Maria Tig recorded 1 ace . Makarova (1996) won 62% points behind her first serve. She quite strong on her second serve to win 43% of the points. On the other side, Maria Tig won 66% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 33% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Makarova (1996) | Maria Tig |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 19 | 10 |
| Converted | 19/41 | 10/18 |
| % Converted | 46% | 56% |
| Conceded | 23 | 13 |
| Saved | 11 | 6 |
| % Saved | 48% | 46% |
| Times Broken | 12 | 7 |
The Russian broke her opponents 19 times with a 46% conversion rate. Makarova (1996) dropped her serve 12 times and she saved 48% of the break points that she conceded. Maria Tig broke her opponent 10 times with a 56% conversion rate. Patricia conceded her serve 7 times and she saved 46% of the break points that she conceded.
| Makarova (1996) | |||||
| Q1 Szabo |
Q3 Bandecchi |
R1 Kozlova |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | 7-5 7-5 | 6-3 1-6 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 24 | 23 | 65 | |
| pts | 61-45 | 80-72 | 94-83 | 235-200 | |
| Total points | 106 | 152 | 177 | 435 | |
| Winners | 26 | 32 | 26 | 84 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 40% | 28% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 2 | 3 | 11 | |
| 1st in | 38/58 | 45/65 | 53/73 | 136/196 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 69% | 73% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 26/38 | 32/45 | 26/53 | 84/136 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 71% | 49% | 62% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/20 | 6/20 | 10/20 | 26/60 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 30% | 50% | 43% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 6 | 8 | 19 | |
| Converted | 5/6 | 6/14 | 8/21 | 19/41 | |
| Converted % | 83% | 43% | 38% | 46% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | 13 | 23 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 1/5 | 7/13 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 20% | 54% | 45% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 4 | 6 | 12 | |
| Maria Tig | |||||
| R1 Matoula |
Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-75 6-3 | ||||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |||
| Tot Games | 32 | 32 | |||
| pts | 119-110 | 119-110 | |||
| Total points | 229 | 229 | |||
| Winners | 46 | 46 | |||
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |||
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |||
| Double Faults | 14 | 14 | |||
| 1st in | 70/115 | 70/115 | |||
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |||
| 1st pts | 46/70 | 46/70 | |||
| % 1st pts | 66% | 66% | |||
| 2nd pts | 15/45 | 15/45 | |||
| % 2nd pts | 33% | 33% | |||
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 10 | 10 | |||
| Converted | 10/18 | 10/18 | |||
| Converted % | 56% | 56% | |||
| Conceded | 13 | 13 | |||
| Saved | 6/13 | 6 | |||
| Saved % | 46% | 15% | |||
| Times Broken | 7 | 7 | |||
Head 2 Head
LWLLLWWWWW
LWWLWWWWWW Tennis Scores in Cluj
- Christian GarinGarin – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (3-6 6-3 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alexei PopyrinPopyrin – Mathias BourgueBourgue (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Roberto MarcoraMarcora – Benjamin BonziBonzi (6-0 7-64) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic – Mikael YmerYmer (6-2 7-67) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Felix Auger AliassimeAuger Aliassime – Antoine HoangHoang (6-3 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alexandre MullerMuller – Joao DominguesDomingues (2-6 7-5 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Adam PavlasekPavlasek – Pablo AndujarAndujar (7-65 0-6 6-5 ret.) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Johan Sebastien TatlotSebastien Tatlot – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (3-6 6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Sorana CirsteaCirstea – Eva LysLys (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yanina WickmayerWickmayer – Jil TeichmannTeichmann (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patricia Maria TigMaria Tig – Ekaterina Makarova (1996)Makarova (1996) (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daria SnigurSnigur – Anna-Lena FriedsamFriedsam (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tamara KorpatschKorpatsch – Jodie Anna BurrageAnna Burrage (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ana BogdanBogdan – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Miriam Bianca BulgaruBianca Bulgaru – Rebeka MasarovaMasarova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anna BondarBondar – Elena Gabriela RuseGabriela Ruse (1-1) – H2H and prediction
