Norbert Gombos and Tristan Lamasine will face off in the qualifications of the Orleans Challenger for the 4th time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 10:30 am on ST CYR EN VAL NO.1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Norbert Gombos who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Norbert Gombos is the pick to win this match.
Norbert Gombos -> 1.58
Tristan Lamasine -> 2.27
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Norbert Gombos vs. Tristan Lamasine
This will be the 4th time that Norbert Gombos and Tristan Lamasine clash against each other. The head to head is 2-1 for Gombos (see full H2H stats),but they are 1-1 on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they competed against each other, Lamasine won 6-7(8) 6-3 6-2 in the 3rd round in the Orleans Challenger back in 2019.
Norbert Gombos
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 18-23 | 2-4 | 11-10 | 4-7 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-28 | 7-3 | 28-17 | 6-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 26-30 | 0-9 | 13-10 | 12-8 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 18-11 | 6-4 | 2-1 | 10-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 273, Norbert got to the qualifications after beating Kenny de Schepper 6-4 6-4.
In the qualifications, Norbert had a good straight sets win against de Schepper (6-4 6-4). During the match, Gombos scored 64 points vs de Schepper’s 53. The Slovakian was very aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Regarding the service games, Gombos made 7 aces and he was pretty steady in conceding no double faults. Overall, Norbert Gombos was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 80% (28/35) of his 1st serve and 56% (15/27) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Gombos broke de Schepper 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Gombos has good match record in the last 10 years having won 54% of his matches (331-279). 3-3 on indoor hard courts in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Gombos has an overall 119-92 record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
The Slovakian’s best result of the year was getting to the final in the Split Challenger.
Gombos has a composed 17-19 win-loss record in 2023, 3-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Orleans Challenger
Tristan Lamasine
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 19-14 | 0-0 | 2-5 | 17-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 59-23 | 4-1 | 23-9 | 30-11 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
| 2022 | 22-27 | 0-0 | 14-18 | 8-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-27 | 3-3 | 14-17 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2020 | 11-16 | 6-3 | 2-6 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 368, Tristan got to the qualifications after beating Gabriel Debru 6-4 7-60.
In the qualifications, Tristan had a good straight sets win against Debru (6-4 7-60). During the match Lamasine scored 87 points vs Debru’s 72. Lamasine was extremely aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about serving, Lamasine was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 2 double faults. Tristan Lamasine lost the serve 4 times and he saved 10 break points. Furthermore, Lamasine put 59% of his first serves in, winning 73% (33/45) of the points behind his 1st serve and 42% (13/31) on the 2nd serve. Lamasine broke Debru 5 times after converting 33% of his break points (5/15).
Tristan’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M15 Grenoble,M15 Creteil,Bresse,M25 Wetzlar and Bigorre.
Tristan has a compiled 51-20 win-loss record in 2023, 22-8 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Orleans Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the semifinal in 2019. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gombos | Lamasine |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 23 |
| Pts | 64-53 | 87-72 |
| Total Points | 117 | 159 |
| Winners | 28 | 33 |
| %Winners | 44% | 38% |
Both Gombos and Lamasine played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Gombos and Lamasine have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Gombos played 3 games less than Lamasine. The Slovakian scored 28 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, Tristan scored 33 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gombos | Lamasine |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 0 |
| 1st in | 35/62 | 45/76 |
| %1st in | 56% | 59% |
| 1st pts | 28/35 | 33/45 |
| %1st pts | 80% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 15/27 | 13/31 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 42% |
Gombos blasted 7 aces . Lamasine didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Gombos won 80% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Lamasine won 73% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 42% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gombos | Lamasine |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 5 |
| Converted | 3/4 | 5/15 |
| % Converted | 75% | 33% |
| Conceded | 4 | 14 |
| Saved | 3 | 10 |
| % Saved | 75% | 71% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 4 |
Gombos broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. Gombos surrendered his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. Lamasine broke his opponent 5 times with a 33% conversion rate. Lamasine conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded.
| Gombos | |||
| Q1 de Schepper |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 64-53 | 64-53 | |
| Total points | 117 | 117 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 35/62 | 35/62 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 28/35 | 28/35 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/27 | 15/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Lamasine | |||
| Q1 Debru |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-60 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 87-72 | 87-72 | |
| Total points | 159 | 159 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 45/76 | 45/76 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 33/45 | 33/45 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/31 | 13/31 | |
| % 2nd pts | 42% | 42% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/15 | 5/15 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 14 | 14 | |
| Saved | 10/14 | 10 | |
| Saved % | 71% | 71% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLLLL
LLWLWLLLWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Richard GasquetGasquet – Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Jesper De JongDe Jong (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan LamasineLamasine – Norbert GombosGombos (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Dennis NovakNovak – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elias YmerYmer – Mathias BourgueBourgue (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine HoangHoang – Lucas PoullainPoullain (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin BonziBonzi – Antoine EscoffierEscoffier (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alex MolcanMolcan – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas MachacMachac – Maxime CressyCressy (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Jack DraperDraper – Radu AlbotAlbot (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kyrian JacquetJacquet – Benoit PairePaire (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri (0-0) – H2H and prediction
