Michael Mmoh and Constant Lestienne will fight against each other in the semifinal of the St. Tropez Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Saturday at 2:00 pm on CENTRAL TAG HEUER. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Michael Mmoh who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Michael Mmoh is the pick to win this match.
Michael Mmoh -> 1.69
Constant Lestienne -> 2.11
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Michael Mmoh vs. Constant Lestienne
This will be the 2nd time that Michael Mmoh and Constant Lestienne play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Lestienne (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they competed against each other, Lestienne won 4-6 6-4 6-4 in the semifinal in the Malaga Challenger back in 2022.
Michael Mmoh
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 8-12 | 3-7 | 2-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 31-21 | 27-14 | 0-1 | 1-4 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
2022 | 44-29 | 18-12 | 8-7 | 17-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
2021 | 19-18 | 14-11 | 2-3 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 13-9 | 6-5 | 3-1 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 94, Michael got to the semifinal after beating Jesper De Jong 6-4 1-6 6-4, Eliakim Coulibaly 6-4 6-2 and Giulio Zeppieri 3-6 6-3 6-4.
In the quarter against Zeppieri, Mmoh recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-3 6-4). During the match, Mmoh scored 92 points vs Zeppieri’s 85. The American was quite aggressive to blast 48 winners.
Regarding the service games, Mmoh bagged 6 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Michael Mmoh lost the serve 3 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Mmoh put 73% of his first serves in, winning 73% (48/66) of the points behind his 1st serve and 32% (8/25) on the 2nd serve. Mmoh broke Zeppieri 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Mmoh has conceded 2 set in this competition to conquer 53% of the points he played.
Mmoh has favorable match record in the last 10 years having won 59% of his matches (270-187). 20-11 on hard in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Mmoh has an overall 173-112 match record in the last years on hard.
Mmoh has an aggregate 23-15 win-loss record in 2023, 20-11 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the St. Tropez Challenger
Michael has never competed in this tournament before.
Constant Lestienne
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 16-22 | 9-11 | 0-3 | 4-4 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
2023 | 32-29 | 22-12 | 0-5 | 7-6 | 3-6 | 0-0 |
2022 | 51-27 | 25-6 | 4-7 | 18-11 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
2021 | 24-20 | 10-3 | 4-9 | 10-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2020 | 8-14 | 2-2 | 1-5 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 107, Constant reached the semifinal after beating Hugo Gaston 6-3 6-2, Harold Mayot 6-3 3-6 6-3 and Sebastian Ofner 6-1 ret..
In the quarter against Ofner, Lestienne had a free pass after Ofner retired on a 6-1 . scoreline.
His best result of the current year was conquering the title the Stanford Challenger where he overcame Emilio Nava in the final 7-6(4) 6-2.
Constant has an aggregate 17-24 win-loss record in 2023, 12-10 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Mmoh | Lestienne |
---|---|---|
Match played | 3 | 3 |
Tot Set | 8 | 7 |
Tot Games | 73 | 51 |
Pts | 258-229 | 172-126 |
Total Points | 487 | 298 |
Winners | 111 | 79 |
%Winners | 43% | 46% |
Both Mmoh and Lestienne played 3 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Michael Mmoh surrendered 2 sets, while Constant Lestienne conceded 1 set. Mmoh has played 1 set more than Lestienne (8 vs 7). Therefore, Mmoh played 22 games more than Lestienne. Michael scored 111 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, Lestienne fired 79 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Mmoh | Lestienne |
---|---|---|
Aces | 19 | 17 |
Avg per match | 6.3 | 5.7 |
1st in | 150/227 | 108/160 |
%1st in | 66% | 68% |
1st pts | 111/150 | 79/108 |
%1st pts | 74% | 73% |
2nd pts | 37/77 | 31/52 |
%2nd pts | 48% | 60% |
Mmoh managed to score 19 aces (6.3 per match). Lestienne managed to score 17 aces (5.7 per match). Mmoh won 74% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 48% of the points. On the other side, Lestienne won 73% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 60% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Mmoh | Lestienne |
---|---|---|
Won | 10 | 9 |
Converted | 10/33 | 9/16 |
% Converted | 30% | 56% |
Conceded | 20 | 7 |
Saved | 14 | 4 |
% Saved | 70% | 57% |
Times Broken | 6 | 3 |
The American broke his opponents 10 times with a 30% conversion rate. Michael conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 70% of the break points that he conceded. The French player broke his opponents 9 times with a 56% conversion rate. Constant conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 57% of the break points that he conceded.
Mmoh | |||||
R1 De |
R2 Coulibaly |
1/4 Zeppieri |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 1-6 6-4 | 6-4 6-2 | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 3 | 8 | |
Tot Games | 27 | 18 | 28 | 73 | |
pts | 84-86 | 82-58 | 92-85 | 258-229 | |
Total points | 170 | 140 | 177 | 487 | |
Winners | 35 | 28 | 48 | 111 | |
%Winners | 42% | 34% | 52% | 43% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 6 | 7 | 6 | 19 | |
Double Faults | 5 | 0 | 5 | 10 | |
1st in | 47/78 | 37/58 | 66/91 | 150/227 | |
% 1st in | 60% | 64% | 73% | 66% | |
1st pts | 35/47 | 28/37 | 48/66 | 111/150 | |
% 1st pts | 74% | 76% | 73% | 74% | |
2nd pts | 14/31 | 15/21 | 8/25 | 37/77 | |
% 2nd pts | 45% | 71% | 32% | 48% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 3 | 3 | 4 | 10 | |
Converted | 3/9 | 3/15 | 4/9 | 10/33 | |
Converted % | 33% | 20% | 44% | 30% | |
Conceded | 8 | 6 | 6 | 20 | |
Saved | 5/8 | 6/6 | 3/6 | 14 | |
Saved % | 63% | 100% | 50% | 71% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
Lestienne | |||||
R1 Gaston |
R2 Mayot |
1/4 Ofner |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-2 | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | 6-1 ret. | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6 | |
Tot Games | 17 | 27 | 7 | 51 | |
pts | 60-39 | 87-78 | 25-9 | 172-126 | |
Total points | 99 | 165 | 34 | 298 | |
Winners | 27 | 41 | 11 | 79 | |
%Winners | 45% | 47% | 44% | 46% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 4 | 10 | 3 | 17 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | |
1st in | 36/53 | 60/89 | 12/18 | 108/160 | |
% 1st in | 68% | 67% | 67% | 68% | |
1st pts | 27/36 | 41/60 | 11/12 | 79/108 | |
% 1st pts | 75% | 68% | 92% | 73% | |
2nd pts | 9/17 | 17/29 | 5/6 | 31/52 | |
% 2nd pts | 53% | 59% | 83% | 60% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 4 | 3 | 2 | 9 | |
Converted | 4/7 | 3/6 | 2/3 | 9/16 | |
Converted % | 57% | 50% | 67% | 56% | |
Conceded | 1 | 6 | 0 | 7 | |
Saved | 0/1 | 4/6 | 0/0 | 4 | |
Saved % | 0% | 67% | – | 22% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in St. Tropez Challenger
- Radu AlbotAlbot – Gijs BrouwerBrouwer (6-3 3-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Sebastian OfnerOfner (6-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Liam BroadyBroady – Arthur CazauxCazaux (7-64 3-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Michael MmohMmoh – Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri (3-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Radu AlbotAlbot – Gijs BrouwerBrouwer (6-3 3-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Liam BroadyBroady – Arthur CazauxCazaux (7-6(4) 3-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Michael MmohMmoh – Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri (3-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Sebastian OfnerOfner (6-1 ret.) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Radu AlbotAlbot – Liam BroadyBroady (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Michael MmohMmoh – Constant LestienneLestienne (0-1) – H2H and prediction