Nerman Fatic and Riccardo Bonadio will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Sibiu Challenger for the 5th time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 10:00 am on CENTRE COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Riccardo Bonadio who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Riccardo Bonadio is the pick to win this match.
Riccardo Bonadio -> 1.61
Nerman Fatic -> 2.21
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Nerman Fatic vs. Riccardo Bonadio
This will be the 5th time that Nerman Fatic and Riccardo Bonadio clash against each other. The head to head is 3-1 for Bonadio (see full H2H stats), 3-1 on clay.
The last time that they played each other, Fatic won 6-3 6-3 in the 1st round in the Sibiu Challenger back in 2022.
Nerman Fatic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14-23 | 3-4 | 10-18 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-28 | 0-1 | 35-25 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 34-27 | 0-1 | 31-19 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 37-26 | 1-1 | 30-22 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 11-3 | 0-0 | 9-1 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 217, Fatic got to the 2nd round after beating Vlad Andrei Dancu 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round, Fatic had a good straight sets win against Andrei Dancu (6-4 6-4). During the match, Fatic scored 74 points vs Andrei Dancu’s 59. Nerman was quite aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Regarding the service games, Fatic managed to score 4 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Nerman Fatic was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 79% (27/34) of his 1st serve and 58% (14/24) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Fatic broke Andrei Dancu 3 times after converting 38% of his break points (3/8).
Fatic has a winning win-loss record in the last 9 years having won 59% of his matches (298-210). 22-19 on clay in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Fatic has an aggregate248-160 record in the last 9 years on clay.
Fatic’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in the Modena Challenger and the San Marino Challenger.
Fatic has a compiled 22-20 win-loss record in 2023, 22-19 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Sibiu Challenger
Riccardo Bonadio
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 19-15 | 1-3 | 17-11 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 32-35 | 7-6 | 25-28 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 45-33 | 2-2 | 42-30 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 28-33 | 0-0 | 27-32 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 29-15 | 6-3 | 23-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 220, Riccardo got to the 2nd round after defeating Steven Diez 6-2 7-5.
In the 1st round, The Italian had a good straight sets win against Diez (6-2 7-5). During the match Bonadio scored 78 points vs Diez’s 57. Bonadio was pretty aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about serving, Bonadio scored 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Riccardo Bonadio was quite efficient on serve to win 73% (27/37) of his 1st serve and 62% (13/21) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Bonadio broke Diez 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Bonadio’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in the Tenerife 3 Challenger,the Ostrava Challenger and the Cordenons Challenger.
The Italian has a compiled 30-28 win-loss record in 2023, 23-21 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Sibiu Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2021 and 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Fatic | Bonadio |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 |
| Pts | 74-59 | 78-57 |
| Total Points | 133 | 135 |
| Winners | 27 | 27 |
| %Winners | 36% | 35% |
Both Fatic and Bonadio played 1 match. Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Fatic and Bonadio have played the same amount of sets 2. They also played the same amount of games (20). Fatic scored 27 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, Riccardo made 27 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Fatic | Bonadio |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 3 |
| 1st in | 34/58 | 37/58 |
| %1st in | 59% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 27/34 | 27/37 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 14/24 | 13/21 |
| %2nd pts | 58% | 62% |
Fatic bagged 4 aces . Bonadio bagged 3 aces . Fatic won 79% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 58% of the points. On the other side, Bonadio won 73% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Fatic | Bonadio |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 4 |
| Converted | 3/8 | 4/9 |
| % Converted | 38% | 44% |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 |
| Saved | 2 | 2 |
| % Saved | 67% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Fatic broke his opponent 3 times with a 38% conversion rate. Fatic conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. The Italian broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Riccardo conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Fatic | |||
| R1 Andrei |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 74-59 | 74-59 | |
| Total points | 133 | 133 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 34/58 | 34/58 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 27/34 | 27/34 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/24 | 14/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/8 | 3/8 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Bonadio | |||
| R1 Diez |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 78-57 | 78-57 | |
| Total points | 135 | 135 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 37/58 | 37/58 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 27/37 | 27/37 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/21 | 13/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWLLLLWW
LWWLWLWWWW Tennis Scores in Sibiu Challenger
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel (6-3 7-62) – See score progression
- Calvin HemeryHemery – Mate ValkuszValkusz (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Bor ArtnakArtnak – Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi (3-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Moez EcharguiEchargui – Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen (2-6 6-0 6-2) – See score progression
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Salvatore CarusoCaruso (6-75 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Nerman FaticFatic – Vlad Andrei DancuAndrei Dancu (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Zsombor PirosPiros – Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic – Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli (3-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Alexander WeisWeis – Michael VrbenskyVrbensky (6-4 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Andrew PaulsonPaulson – Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Ivan GakhovGakhov – Clement TaburTabur (6-1 4-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Riccardo BonadioBonadio – Steven DiezDiez (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Sebastian GimaGima (7-62 6-3) – See score progression
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Carlos TabernerTaberner (7-64 6-2) – See score progression
- Zsombor PirosPiros – Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Andrew PaulsonPaulson – Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Calvin HemeryHemery – Mate ValkuszValkusz (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Bor ArtnakArtnak – Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi (3-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Alexander WeisWeis – Michael VrbenskyVrbensky (6-4 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Nerman FaticFatic – Vlad Andrei DancuAndrei Dancu (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Moez EcharguiEchargui – Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen (2-6 6-0 6-2) – See score progression
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel (6-3 7-6(2)) – See score progression
- Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic – Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli (3-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Salvatore CarusoCaruso (6-7(5) 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Riccardo BonadioBonadio – Nerman FaticFatic (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Calvin HemeryHemery – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ivan GakhovGakhov – Alexander WeisWeis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Moez EcharguiEchargui – Damir DzumhurDzumhur (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Giovanni FonioFonio – Cezar Cretu (ROU)Cretu (ROU) (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zsombor PirosPiros – Andrew PaulsonPaulson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu – Edoardo LavagnoLavagno (0-0) – H2H and prediction
