Radu Mihai Papoe and Jack Anthrop will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Columbus Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:00 pm on COURT 1. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Radu Mihai Papoe who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Radu Mihai Papoe is the pick to win this match.
Radu Mihai Papoe -> 1.55
Jack Anthrop -> 2.34
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Radu Mihai Papoe vs. Jack Anthrop
There is no head to head record between Radu Mihai Papoe and Jack Anthrop since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Radu Mihai Papoe
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 32-8 | 0-0 | 19-6 | 13-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 23-9 | 3-1 | 16-5 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 16-11 | 2-1 | 11-7 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 564, the Romanian reached the qualifications after beating Quinn Vandecasteele 4-6 7-5 6-3.
In the qualifications against Vandecasteele, Mihai Papoe recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-5 6-3). During the match, Mihai Papoe scored 98 points vs Vandecasteele’s 89. Mihai Papoe was exceptionally aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Regarding the service games, Mihai Papoe managed to score 2 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Radu Mihai Papoe lost the serve 6 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Mihai Papoe put 66% of his first serves in, winning 63% (36/57) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (14/29) on the 2nd serve. Mihai Papoe broke Vandecasteele 8 times after converting 57% of his break points (8/14).
Mihai Papoe has a solid win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 69% of his matches (77-35). 6-0 on indoor hard courts in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Mihai Papoe has a composed13-6 match record in the last 6 years on indoor hard courts.
The Romanian’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M15 Ithaca,M15 Cluj Napoca and M15 Curtea de Arges.
Radu has an overall 25-6 win-loss record in 2023, 6-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Columbus Challenger
Mihai Papoe has never competed in this tournament before.
Jack Anthrop
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 8-7 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 9-10 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 3-5 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 887, the American reached the qualifications after beating Stefan Kozlov 6-4 4-6 6-4.
In the qualifications, Anthrop defeated Kozlov (6-4 4-6 6-4). During the match Anthrop scored 95 points vs Kozlov’s 91. Anthrop was quite aggressive to blast 43 winners.
Talking about serving, Anthrop recorded 5 aces and he was extremely consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Overall, Jack Anthrop was very efficient on serve to win 74% (43/58) of his 1st serve and 59% (20/34) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Anthrop broke Kozlov twice after converting 17% of his break points (2/12).
Anthrop’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M15 San Diego.
Anthrop has an aggregate 7-5 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Columbus Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Mihai Papoe | Anthrop |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 31 | 30 |
| Pts | 98-89 | 95-91 |
| Total Points | 187 | 186 |
| Winners | 36 | 43 |
| %Winners | 37% | 45% |
Both Mihai Papoe and Anthrop played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Radu Mihai Papoe lost 1 set, while Jack Anthrop surrendered 1 set. Talking about their workload, Mihai Papoe and Anthrop have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Mihai Papoe played 1 game more than Anthrop. Mihai Papoe scored 36 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Anthrop struck 43 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Mihai Papoe | Anthrop |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 5 |
| 1st in | 57/86 | 58/92 |
| %1st in | 66% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 36/57 | 43/58 |
| %1st pts | 63% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 14/29 | 20/34 |
| %2nd pts | 48% | 59% |
Mihai Papoe fired 2 aces . Anthrop recorded 5 aces . Mihai Papoe won 63% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 48% of the points. On the other side, Anthrop won 74% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Mihai Papoe | Anthrop |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 8 | 2 |
| Converted | 8/14 | 2/12 |
| % Converted | 57% | 17% |
| Conceded | 10 | 5 |
| Saved | 4 | 4 |
| % Saved | 40% | 80% |
| Times Broken | 6 | 1 |
Radu broke his opponent 8 times with a 57% conversion rate. The Romanian lost his serve 6 times and he saved 40% of the break points that he conceded. Anthrop broke his opponent twice with a 17% conversion rate. Anthrop conceded his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded.
| Mihai Papoe | |||
| Q1 Vandecasteele |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 7-5 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 98-89 | 98-89 | |
| Total points | 187 | 187 | |
| Winners | 36 | 36 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 57/86 | 57/86 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 36/57 | 36/57 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 63% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/29 | 14/29 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 8 | 8 | |
| Converted | 8/14 | 8/14 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 4/10 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 40% | 40% | |
| Times Broken | 6 | 6 | |
| Anthrop | |||
| Q1 Kozlov |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 4-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
| pts | 95-91 | 95-91 | |
| Total points | 186 | 186 | |
| Winners | 43 | 43 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 58/92 | 58/92 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 43/58 | 43/58 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/34 | 20/34 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/12 | 2/12 | |
| Converted % | 17% | 17% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Bernard TomicTomic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Guido AndreozziAndreozzi – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Illya MarchenkoMarchenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Michael GeertsGeerts (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elmar EjupovicEjupovic – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christian HarrisonHarrison – Aziz DougazDougaz (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – Alfredo PerezPerez (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – Robert CashCash (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adam WaltonWalton – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Cannon KingsleyKingsley – Alexander RitschardRitschard (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
