Marc Polmans and Terence Atmane will play each other in the final of the Guangzhou Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Saturday at 1:30 pm on CENTRAL COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Terence Atmane who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Terence Atmane is the pick to win this match.
Terence Atmane -> 1.72
Marc Polmans -> 2.06
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Marc Polmans vs. Terence Atmane
There is no head to head record between Marc Polmans and Terence Atmane since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Marc Polmans
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 7-14 | 3-6 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
2023 | 50-35 | 32-23 | 14-9 | 2-1 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
2022 | 18-13 | 14-12 | 0-0 | 4-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 15-28 | 1-6 | 8-13 | 2-6 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
2020 | 11-16 | 2-6 | 5-4 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 167, the Australian reached the final after defeating Arthur Weber 7-65 7-5, Colin Sinclair 6-4 6-4, Li Tu 6-3 6-4 and Evgeny Donskoy 6-3 6-4.
In the semifinal, Polmans had a good straight sets win against Donskoy (6-3 6-4). During the match, Polmans scored 60 points vs Donskoy’s 46. The Australian was pretty aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Regarding the service games, Polmans blasted 5 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Marc Polmans was quite efficient on serve to win 77% (24/31) of his 1st serve and 65% (17/26) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Marc broke Donskoy 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Marc hasn’t dropped yet a set in this event to win 54% of the points he played.
Polmans has winning match record in the last 10 years having won 56% of his matches (292-228). 19-15 on hard in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Polmans has an overall 166-128 match record in the last years on hard.
Polmans’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M25 Canberra.
The Australian has a compiled 35-26 win-loss record in 2023, 19-15 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Guangzhou Challenger
The Australian has never competed in this tournament before.
Terence Atmane
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 20-19 | 12-8 | 5-5 | 1-2 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
2023 | 54-27 | 26-10 | 26-15 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 78-30 | 71-23 | 3-3 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 23-22 | 23-19 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 7-10 | 7-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 173 (career-high), the French player reached the final after defeating Lorenzo Giustino 6-0 4-6 6-3, Alafia Ayeni 7-62 7-61, Christopher O Connell 7-5 6-3 and Bu Yunchaokete 6-3 6-4.
In the semifinal, Terence had a good straight sets win against Yunchaokete (6-3 6-4). During the match Atmane scored 64 points vs Yunchaokete’s 46. The French player was very aggressive to blast 28 winners.
About the serving games, Atmane scored 10 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Terence Atmane was extremely effective on serve to win 82% (28/34) of his 1st serve and 58% (14/24) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Terence broke Yunchaokete 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The French player has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 56% of the points he played.
His best result of the current year was winning the title the Zhangjiagang Challenger where he defeated Mikalai Haliak in the final 6-1 6-2.
Atmane has an overall 46-21 win-loss record in 2023, 20-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Polmans | Atmane |
---|---|---|
Match played | 4 | 4 |
Tot Set | 8 | 9 |
Tot Games | 83 | 91 |
Pts | 276-234 | 304-239 |
Total Points | 510 | 543 |
Winners | 131 | 142 |
%Winners | 47% | 47% |
Both Polmans and Atmane played 4 matches. At the moment, Terence Atmane dropped 1 set while Marc Polmans hasn’t conceded a set so far. Polmans has played 1 set(s) less than Atmane (8 vs 9). Therefore, Polmans played 8 games less than Atmane. Polmans scored 131 winners (47% of the total points). On the other side, Atmane bagged 142 winners (47%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Polmans | Atmane |
---|---|---|
Aces | 37 | 38 |
Avg per match | 9.3 | 9.5 |
1st in | 163/253 | 181/286 |
%1st in | 64% | 63% |
1st pts | 131/163 | 142/181 |
%1st pts | 80% | 78% |
2nd pts | 47/90 | 59/105 |
%2nd pts | 52% | 56% |
Polmans fired 37 aces (9.3 per match). Atmane bagged 38 aces (9.5 per match). Polmans won 80% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Atmane won 78% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Polmans | Atmane |
---|---|---|
Won | 10 | 12 |
Converted | 10/25 | 12/25 |
% Converted | 40% | 48% |
Conceded | 11 | 17 |
Saved | 8 | 12 |
% Saved | 73% | 71% |
Times Broken | 3 | 5 |
Polmans broke his opponents 10 times with a 40% conversion rate. Marc lost his serve 3 times and he saved 73% of the break points that he conceded. Atmane broke his opponents 12 times with a 48% conversion rate. Terence conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded.
Polmans | ||||||
R1 Weber |
R2 Sinclair |
1/4 Tu |
1/2 Donskoy |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-65 7-5 | 6-4 6-4 | 6-3 6-4 | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |
Tot Games | 25 | 20 | 19 | 19 | 83 | |
pts | 74-68 | 81-70 | 61-50 | 60-46 | 276-234 | |
Total points | 142 | 151 | 111 | 106 | 510 | |
Winners | 39 | 35 | 33 | 24 | 131 | |
%Winners | 53% | 43% | 54% | 40% | 47% | |
SERVE | ||||||
Aces | 10 | 14 | 8 | 5 | 37 | |
Double Faults | 6 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 14 | |
1st in | 47/71 | 47/67 | 38/58 | 31/57 | 163/253 | |
% 1st in | 66% | 70% | 66% | 54% | 64% | |
1st pts | 39/47 | 35/47 | 33/38 | 24/31 | 131/163 | |
% 1st pts | 83% | 74% | 87% | 77% | 80% | |
2nd pts | 9/24 | 11/20 | 10/20 | 17/26 | 47/90 | |
% 2nd pts | 38% | 55% | 50% | 65% | 52% | |
Breaks | ||||||
Won | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 10 | |
Converted | 3/4 | 2/14 | 2/3 | 3/4 | 10/25 | |
Converted % | 75% | 14% | 67% | 75% | 40% | |
Conceded | 3 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 11 | |
Saved | 1/3 | 1/1 | 2/2 | 4/5 | 8 | |
Saved % | 33% | 100% | 100% | 80% | 78% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
Atmane | ||||||
R1 Giustino |
R2 Ayeni |
1/4 O |
1/2 Yunchaokete |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-0 4-6 6-3 | 7-62 7-61 | 7-5 6-3 | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | |
Tot Games | 25 | 26 | 21 | 19 | 91 | |
pts | 82-61 | 84-73 | 74-59 | 64-46 | 304-239 | |
Total points | 143 | 157 | 133 | 110 | 543 | |
Winners | 36 | 41 | 37 | 28 | 142 | |
%Winners | 44% | 49% | 50% | 44% | 47% | |
SERVE | ||||||
Aces | 6 | 11 | 11 | 10 | 38 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 9 | |
1st in | 46/70 | 55/87 | 46/71 | 34/58 | 181/286 | |
% 1st in | 66% | 63% | 65% | 59% | 63% | |
1st pts | 36/46 | 41/55 | 37/46 | 28/34 | 142/181 | |
% 1st pts | 78% | 75% | 80% | 82% | 78% | |
2nd pts | 15/24 | 18/32 | 12/25 | 14/24 | 59/105 | |
% 2nd pts | 63% | 56% | 48% | 58% | 56% | |
Breaks | ||||||
Won | 4 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 12 | |
Converted | 4/8 | 2/2 | 3/10 | 3/5 | 12/25 | |
Converted % | 50% | 100% | 30% | 60% | 48% | |
Conceded | 4 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 17 | |
Saved | 3/4 | 4/6 | 3/4 | 2/3 | 12 | |
Saved % | 75% | 67% | 75% | 67% | 71% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Marc PolmansPolmans (0-0) – H2H and prediction