Christopher O Connell and Arjun Kadhe will face off in the 2nd round of the Guangzhou Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 10:00 am on COURT 2. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Christopher O Connell who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Christopher O Connell is the pick to win this match.
Christopher O Connell -> 1.037
Arjun Kadhe -> 9.2
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Christopher O Connell vs. Arjun Kadhe
There is no head to head record between Christopher O Connell and Arjun Kadhe since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Christopher O Connell
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 26-25 | 23-16 | 2-4 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-34 | 19-18 | 11-9 | 4-3 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 50-25 | 30-16 | 12-5 | 3-1 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 22-16 | 14-9 | 3-3 | 1-1 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 12-12 | 4-5 | 4-3 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 53 (career-high), Christopher got to the 2nd round after beating Dominik Palan 7-66 6-2.
In the 1st round, O Connell had a good straight sets win against Palan (7-66 6-2). During the match, O Connell scored 79 points vs Palan’s 65. The Australian was quite aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Talking about the service games, O Connell bagged 7 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Christopher O Connell lost the serve once and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, O Connell put 54% of his first serves in, winning 70% (23/33) of the points behind his 1st serve and 71% (20/28) on the 2nd serve. Christopher broke Palan 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
O Connell has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 63% of his matches (350-204). 16-14 on hard in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, O Connell has a compiled 151-98 match record in the last years on hard.
His best result of the current season was winning the title the Shanghai Challenger where he defeated Yosuke Watanuki in the final 6-3 7-5.
O Connell has an overall 31-27 win-loss record in 2023, 16-14 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Guangzhou Challenger
The Australian has never competed in this tournament before.
Arjun Kadhe
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 5-9 | 5-6 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 17-19 | 14-10 | 3-8 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 9-13 | 5-6 | 2-3 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 15-14 | 13-10 | 2-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 806, Kadhe got to the 2nd round after beating Jimmy Yang 3-6 7-65 6-3, Stefanos Sakellaridis 6-3 6-1 and Filip Peliwo 7-63 6-1.
In the 1st round, Kadhe had a good straight sets win against Peliwo (7-63 6-1). During the match Kadhe scored 76 points vs Peliwo’s 51. The Indian was quite aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about serving, Kadhe made 10 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Arjun Kadhe was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 86% (30/35) of his 1st serve and 60% (9/15) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Kadhe broke Peliwo 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Kadhe has an overall 5-6 win-loss record in 2023, 5-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | O Connell | Kadhe |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 21 | 67 |
| Pts | 79-65 | 247-199 |
| Total Points | 144 | 446 |
| Winners | 23 | 93 |
| %Winners | 29% | 38% |
O Connell played 1 match while Kadhe competed in 3 matches. Kadhe started his run from the qualifications while O Connell had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Arjun Kadhe conceded 1 set while Christopher O Connell hasn’t lost a set so far. O Connell has played 5 set(s) less than Kadhe (2 vs 7). Therefore, O Connell played 46 games less than Kadhe. Christopher scored 23 winners (29% of the total points). On the other side, Arjun made 93 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | O Connell | Kadhe |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 19 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 6.3 |
| 1st in | 33/61 | 115/187 |
| %1st in | 54% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 23/33 | 93/115 |
| %1st pts | 70% | 81% |
| 2nd pts | 20/28 | 40/72 |
| %2nd pts | 71% | 56% |
O Connell scored 7 aces . Kadhe scored 19 aces (6.3 per match). O Connell won 70% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 71% of the points. On the other side, Kadhe won 81% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | O Connell | Kadhe |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 11 |
| Converted | 3/7 | 11/31 |
| % Converted | 43% | 35% |
| Conceded | 2 | 7 |
| Saved | 1 | 4 |
| % Saved | 50% | 57% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 |
Christopher broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. The Australian surrendered his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Arjun broke his opponents 11 times with a 35% conversion rate. Arjun conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 57% of the break points that he conceded.
| O Connell | |||
| R1 Palan |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-66 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 79-65 | 79-65 | |
| Total points | 144 | 144 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 29% | 29% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 33/61 | 33/61 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 23/33 | 23/33 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/28 | 20/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 71% | 71% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Kadhe | |||||
| Q1 Yang |
Q3 Sakellaridis |
R1 Peliwo |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 7-65 6-3 | 6-3 6-1 | 7-63 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 16 | 20 | 67 | |
| pts | 107-107 | 64-41 | 76-51 | 247-199 | |
| Total points | 214 | 105 | 127 | 446 | |
| Winners | 39 | 24 | 30 | 93 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 38% | 39% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 6 | 3 | 10 | 19 | |
| Double Faults | 8 | 1 | 1 | 10 | |
| 1st in | 50/91 | 30/46 | 35/50 | 115/187 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 65% | 70% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 39/50 | 24/30 | 30/35 | 93/115 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 80% | 86% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 21/41 | 10/16 | 9/15 | 40/72 | |
| % 2nd pts | 51% | 63% | 60% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 4 | 4 | 11 | |
| Converted | 3/11 | 4/10 | 4/10 | 11/31 | |
| Converted % | 27% | 40% | 40% | 35% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 2/2 | 1/2 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 100% | 50% | 183% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLLLLWWW
LLW Tennis Scores in Guangzhou Challenger
- Luke SavilleSaville – Hiroki MoriyaMoriya (6-3 2-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Omar JasikaJasika – Alex BoltBolt (5-7 6-2 7-66) – See score progression
- Alibek KachmazovKachmazov – Zhe LiLi (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (6-0 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Aoran WangWang – Tao MuMu (6-2 1-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Dane SweenySweeny – Qian SunSun (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Dominik PalanPalan (7-66 6-2) – See score progression
- Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy – Antoine BellierBellier (6-4 7-62) – See score progression
- Colin SinclairSinclair – Luca CastelnuovoCastelnuovo (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Arjun KadheKadhe – Filip PeliwoPeliwo (7-63 6-1) – See score progression
- Li TuTu – Nick ChappellChappell (6-1 2-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Juncheng ShangShang – Mikalai HaliakHaliak (6-77 6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete – Bang Shuo YinShuo Yin (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Evan ZhuZhu (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Alafia AyeniAyeni – Ye Cong MoCong Mo (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Arthur WeberWeber (7-65 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Li TuTu – Aoran WangWang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Arjun KadheKadhe (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Colin SinclairSinclair – Marc PolmansPolmans (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Omar JasikaJasika – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alafia AyeniAyeni – Terence AtmaneAtmane (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Dane SweenySweeny – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete – Luke SavilleSaville (0-0) – H2H and prediction
