![Prediction And Head To Head Sumit Nagal Vs. Vit Kopriva Peljct28ja Prediction and head to head Sumit Nagal vs. Vit Kopriva](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Sumit-Nagal-vs.-Vit-Kopriva-peLjcT28Ja.jpg)
Sumit Nagal and Vit Kopriva will clash against each other in the final of the Tulln Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 2:00 pm on CENTRE COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Vit Kopriva who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Vit Kopriva is the pick to win this match.
Vit Kopriva -> 1.76
Sumit Nagal -> 2.01
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Sumit Nagal vs. Vit Kopriva
There is no head to head record between Sumit Nagal and Vit Kopriva since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Sumit Nagal
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 28-14 | 15-8 | 13-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 46-29 | 9-8 | 32-17 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 17-18 | 0-1 | 16-17 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 23-26 | 1-4 | 22-22 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 8-14 | 2-4 | 5-5 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 189, Sumit reached the final after beating Daniel Masur 6-1 6-2, Vitaliy Sachko 7-62 3-6 6-3, Albert Ramos-Vinolas 7-66 6-3 and Flavio Cobolli 6-3 6-4.
In the semifinal, Nagal had a good straight sets win against Cobolli (6-3 6-4). During the match, Nagal scored 66 points vs Cobolli’s 51. Nagal was exceptionally aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about the service games, Nagal blasted 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Sumit Nagal was very effective on serve to win 72% (33/46) of his 1st serve and 64% (9/14) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Sumit broke Cobolli 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Nagal has lost 1 set in this event to win 55% of the points he played.
Nagal has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 61% of his matches (292-188). 31-14 on clay in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Nagal has an aggregate 208-118 record in the last years on clay.
His best result of the season was winning the title the Rome Challenger where he defeated Jesper De Jong in the final 6-3 6-2 and the Tampere Challenger where he defeated Dalibor Svrcina in the final 6-4 7-5.
Sumit has an overall 39-22 win-loss record in 2023, 31-14 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tulln Challenger
The Indian has never competed in this tournament before.
Vit Kopriva
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 18-15 | 9-7 | 5-7 | 2-1 | 2-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 35-27 | 1-4 | 34-21 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 39-28 | 7-5 | 30-18 | 1-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2021 | 36-26 | 1-3 | 32-21 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 24-15 | 0-0 | 17-11 | 7-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 194, Kopriva got to the final after defeating Zdenek Kolar 6-2 7-64, Jurij Rodionov 7-5 2-6 6-4, Dimitar Kuzmanov 6-1 6-1 and Maximilian Marterer 6-3 6-3.
In the semifinal, Kopriva had a good straight sets win against Marterer (6-3 6-3). During the match Kopriva scored 63 points vs Marterer’s 42. The Czech was pretty aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Talking about serving, Kopriva blasted 2 aces and he was pretty consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Vit Kopriva was pretty efficient on serve to win 96% (22/23) of his 1st serve and 65% (15/23) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Kopriva broke Marterer 3 times after converting 27% of his break points (3/11).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Czech has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 56% of the points he played.
His best result of the current season was winning the title the Verona Challenger where he defeated Vitaliy Sachko in the final 1-6 7-6(3) 6-2.
Vit has a compiled 23-22 win-loss record in 2023, 22-16 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Nagal | Kopriva |
---|---|---|
Match played | 4 | 4 |
Tot Set | 9 | 9 |
Tot Games | 87 | 83 |
Pts | 299-247 | 300-233 |
Total Points | 546 | 533 |
Winners | 136 | 101 |
%Winners | 45% | 34% |
Both Nagal and Kopriva played 4 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Sumit Nagal conceded 1 set, while Vit Kopriva dropped 1 set. Talking about their workload, Nagal and Kopriva have played the same amount of sets 9. However, Nagal played 4 games more than Kopriva. Sumit scored 136 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, Vit bagged 101 winners (34%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Nagal | Kopriva |
---|---|---|
Aces | 9 | 11 |
Avg per match | 2.3 | 2.8 |
1st in | 192/267 | 133/248 |
%1st in | 72% | 54% |
1st pts | 136/192 | 101/133 |
%1st pts | 71% | 76% |
2nd pts | 39/75 | 65/115 |
%2nd pts | 52% | 57% |
Nagal fired 9 aces (2.3 per match). Kopriva recorded 11 aces (2.8 per match). Nagal won 71% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Kopriva won 76% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Nagal | Kopriva |
---|---|---|
Won | 16 | 17 |
Converted | 16/27 | 17/41 |
% Converted | 59% | 41% |
Conceded | 15 | 21 |
Saved | 8 | 14 |
% Saved | 53% | 67% |
Times Broken | 7 | 7 |
The Indian broke his opponents 16 times with a 59% conversion rate. Sumit surrendered his serve 7 times and he saved 53% of the break points that he conceded. Kopriva broke his opponents 17 times with a 41% conversion rate. The Czech conceded his serve 7 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
Nagal | ||||||
R1 Masur |
R2 Sachko |
1/4 Ramos-Vinolas |
1/2 Cobolli |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 6-2 | 7-62 3-6 6-3 | 7-66 6-3 | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 9 | |
Tot Games | 15 | 31 | 22 | 19 | 87 | |
pts | 60-36 | 99-100 | 74-60 | 66-51 | 299-247 | |
Total points | 96 | 199 | 134 | 117 | 546 | |
Winners | 23 | 44 | 36 | 33 | 136 | |
%Winners | 38% | 44% | 49% | 50% | 45% | |
SERVE | ||||||
Aces | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 9 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 9 | |
1st in | 33/39 | 63/106 | 50/62 | 46/60 | 192/267 | |
% 1st in | 85% | 59% | 81% | 77% | 72% | |
1st pts | 23/33 | 44/63 | 36/50 | 33/46 | 136/192 | |
% 1st pts | 70% | 70% | 72% | 72% | 71% | |
2nd pts | 3/6 | 21/43 | 6/12 | 9/14 | 39/75 | |
% 2nd pts | 50% | 49% | 50% | 64% | 52% | |
Breaks | ||||||
Won | 6 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 16 | |
Converted | 6/11 | 3/6 | 4/5 | 3/5 | 16/27 | |
Converted % | 55% | 50% | 80% | 60% | 59% | |
Conceded | 2 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 15 | |
Saved | 1/2 | 2/5 | 1/3 | 4/5 | 8 | |
Saved % | 50% | 40% | 33% | 80% | 51% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 7 |
Kopriva | ||||||
R1 Kolar |
R2 Rodionov |
1/4 Kuzmanov |
1/2 Marterer |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 7-64 | 7-5 2-6 6-4 | 6-1 6-1 | 6-3 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 9 | |
Tot Games | 21 | 30 | 14 | 18 | 83 | |
pts | 83-69 | 102-100 | 52-22 | 63-42 | 300-233 | |
Total points | 152 | 202 | 74 | 105 | 533 | |
Winners | 25 | 38 | 16 | 22 | 101 | |
%Winners | 30% | 37% | 31% | 35% | 34% | |
SERVE | ||||||
Aces | 2 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 11 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5 | |
1st in | 32/66 | 58/98 | 20/38 | 23/46 | 133/248 | |
% 1st in | 48% | 59% | 53% | 50% | 54% | |
1st pts | 25/32 | 38/58 | 16/20 | 22/23 | 101/133 | |
% 1st pts | 78% | 66% | 80% | 96% | 76% | |
2nd pts | 23/34 | 16/40 | 11/18 | 15/23 | 65/115 | |
% 2nd pts | 68% | 40% | 61% | 65% | 57% | |
Breaks | ||||||
Won | 3 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 17 | |
Converted | 3/11 | 5/11 | 6/8 | 3/11 | 17/41 | |
Converted % | 27% | 45% | 75% | 27% | 41% | |
Conceded | 1 | 17 | 3 | 0 | 21 | |
Saved | 0/1 | 12/17 | 2/3 | 0/0 | 14 | |
Saved % | 0% | 71% | 67% | – | 35% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Tennis Scores in Tulln Challenger
- Zdenek Kolar/Blaz RolaKolar/Blaz Rola – Piotr Matuszewski/Kai WehneltMatuszewski/Kai Wehnelt (6-4 4-6 10-6) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Sumit NagalNagal – Vit KoprivaKopriva (0-0) – H2H and prediction