Albert Ramos-Vinolas and Sumit Nagal will fight against each other in the quarter of the Tulln Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 4:00 pm on CENTRE COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Albert Ramos-Vinolas who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Albert Ramos-Vinolas is the pick to win this match.
Albert Ramos-Vinolas -> 1.35
Sumit Nagal -> 3.08
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Albert Ramos-Vinolas vs. Sumit Nagal
This will be the 3rd time that Albert Ramos-Vinolas and Sumit Nagal fight against each other. The head to head is 1-1 for Ramos-Vinolas and Nagal (see full H2H stats),but they are 1-1 on clay.
The last time that they locked horns, Ramos-Vinolas won 4-6 6-2 7-5 in the quarter in Buenos Aires back in 2021.
Highlights Albert Ramos-Vinolas vs Sumit Nagal – Buenos Aires 05-March-2021
Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 25-28 | 0-2 | 25-26 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 33-37 | 1-8 | 30-24 | 2-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
2022 | 27-28 | 4-7 | 21-15 | 2-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
2021 | 24-26 | 5-8 | 19-12 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
2020 | 9-14 | 2-3 | 7-9 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 88, Ramos-Vinolas reached the quarter after beating Filip Misolic 6-4 7-62 and Gerald Melzer 6-3 6-2.
In the 2nd round, The Spaniard had a good straight sets win against Melzer (6-3 6-2). During the match, Ramos-Vinolas scored 65 points vs Melzer’s 41. Ramos-Vinolas was very aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Regarding the service games, Ramos-Vinolas blasted 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Albert Ramos-Vinolas lost the serve twice and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Ramos-Vinolas put 59% of his first serves in, winning 64% (21/33) of the points behind his 1st serve and 65% (15/23) on the 2nd serve. Ramos-Vinolas was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Melzer 5 times.
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Spaniard hasn’t lost yet a set in this competition to conquer 58% of the points he played.
Ramos-Vinolas has favorable match record in the last 10 years having won 53% of his matches (317-282). 19-19 on clay in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Ramos-Vinolas has an aggregate 247-157 match record in the last years on clay.
Ramos-Vinolas’s best result of the year was getting to the final in Gstaad.
Albert has an overall 19-28 win-loss record in 2023, 19-19 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tulln Challenger
Albert has never competed in this tournament before.
Sumit Nagal
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 31-24 | 15-13 | 16-10 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 46-29 | 9-8 | 32-17 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 17-18 | 0-1 | 16-17 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 23-26 | 1-4 | 22-22 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 8-14 | 2-4 | 5-5 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 189, Sumit reached the quarter after beating Daniel Masur 6-1 6-2 and Vitaliy Sachko 7-62 3-6 6-3.
In the 2nd round, Nagal defeated Sachko (7-62 3-6 6-3).During the match Nagal scored less points (1) than Sachko. In fact, the world no. 88 won 99 points vs Sachko’s. That means that Nagal was more focused during the important points. The Indian was extremely aggressive to blast 44 winners.
Talking about serving, Nagal scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 6 double faults. Sumit Nagal lost the serve 3 times and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Nagal put 59% of his first serves in, winning 70% (44/63) of the points behind his 1st serve and 49% (21/43) on the 2nd serve. Nagal broke Sachko 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Indian has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 54% of the points he played.
His best result of the current year was winning the title the Rome Challenger where he overcame Jesper De Jong in the final 6-3 6-2 and the Tampere Challenger where he overcame Dalibor Svrcina in the final 6-4 7-5.
The Indian has a compiled 37-22 win-loss record in 2023, 29-14 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Ramos-Vinolas | Nagal |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 2 |
Tot Set | 4 | 5 |
Tot Games | 40 | 46 |
Pts | 144-106 | 159-136 |
Total Points | 250 | 295 |
Winners | 60 | 67 |
%Winners | 42% | 42% |
Both Ramos-Vinolas and Nagal played 2 matches. At the moment, Sumit Nagal surrendered 1 set while Albert Ramos-Vinolas hasn’t conceded a set so far. Ramos-Vinolas has played 1 set(s) less than Nagal (4 vs 5). Therefore, Ramos-Vinolas played 6 games less than Nagal. Albert scored 60 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, The Indian fired 67 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Ramos-Vinolas | Nagal |
---|---|---|
Aces | 7 | 4 |
Avg per match | 3.5 | 2 |
1st in | 83/123 | 96/145 |
%1st in | 67% | 66% |
1st pts | 60/83 | 67/96 |
%1st pts | 72% | 70% |
2nd pts | 24/40 | 24/49 |
%2nd pts | 60% | 49% |
Ramos-Vinolas managed to score 7 aces (3.5 per match). Nagal recorded 4 aces (2 per match). Ramos-Vinolas won 72% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 60% of the points. On the other side, Nagal won 70% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 49% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Ramos-Vinolas | Nagal |
---|---|---|
Won | 7 | 9 |
Converted | 7/13 | 9/17 |
% Converted | 54% | 53% |
Conceded | 10 | 7 |
Saved | 7 | 3 |
% Saved | 70% | 43% |
Times Broken | 3 | 4 |
Ramos-Vinolas broke his opponents 7 times with a 54% conversion rate. Ramos-Vinolas surrendered his serve 3 times and he saved 70% of the break points that he conceded. The Indian broke his opponents 9 times with a 53% conversion rate. Nagal conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 43% of the break points that he conceded.
Ramos-Vinolas | ||||
R1 Misolic |
R2 Melzer |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 7-62 | 6-3 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Tot Games | 23 | 17 | 40 | |
pts | 79-65 | 65-41 | 144-106 | |
Total points | 144 | 106 | 250 | |
Winners | 39 | 21 | 60 | |
%Winners | 49% | 32% | 42% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 3 | 4 | 7 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
1st in | 50/67 | 33/56 | 83/123 | |
% 1st in | 75% | 59% | 67% | |
1st pts | 39/50 | 21/33 | 60/83 | |
% 1st pts | 78% | 64% | 72% | |
2nd pts | 9/17 | 15/23 | 24/40 | |
% 2nd pts | 53% | 65% | 60% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 2 | 5 | 7 | |
Converted | 2/8 | 5/5 | 7/13 | |
Converted % | 25% | 100% | 54% | |
Conceded | 3 | 7 | 10 | |
Saved | 2/3 | 5/7 | 7 | |
Saved % | 67% | 71% | 69% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Nagal | ||||
R1 Masur |
R2 Sachko |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 6-2 | 7-62 3-6 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
Tot Games | 15 | 31 | 46 | |
pts | 60-36 | 99-100 | 159-136 | |
Total points | 96 | 199 | 295 | |
Winners | 23 | 44 | 67 | |
%Winners | 38% | 44% | 42% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 6 | 7 | |
1st in | 33/39 | 63/106 | 96/145 | |
% 1st in | 85% | 59% | 66% | |
1st pts | 23/33 | 44/63 | 67/96 | |
% 1st pts | 70% | 70% | 70% | |
2nd pts | 3/6 | 21/43 | 24/49 | |
% 2nd pts | 50% | 49% | 49% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 6 | 3 | 9 | |
Converted | 6/11 | 3/6 | 9/17 | |
Converted % | 55% | 50% | 53% | |
Conceded | 2 | 5 | 7 | |
Saved | 1/2 | 2/5 | 3 | |
Saved % | 50% | 40% | 45% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas – Sumit NagalNagal (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Vit KoprivaKopriva (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna – Maximilian MartererMarterer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Henri SquireSquire (0-0) – H2H and prediction