Elizabeth Mandlik and Na-Lae Han will fight against each other in the qualifications of the U.S. Open for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 1:30 pm on Court 11. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Elizabeth Mandlik who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Elizabeth Mandlik is the pick to win this match.
Elizabeth Mandlik -> 1.4
Na-Lae Han -> 2.84
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Elizabeth Mandlik vs. Na-Lae Han
This will be the 2nd time that Elizabeth Mandlik and Na-Lae Han square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Mandlik (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they squared off, Mandlik won 0-6 6-1 6-2 in the qualifications in Montreal back in August 2023.
Elizabeth Mandlik
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 21-27 | 15-14 | 3-8 | 0-1 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-33 | 15-17 | 19-12 | 0-1 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 37-24 | 26-12 | 10-9 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 30-22 | 24-13 | 6-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-8 | 3-4 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 154, Elizabeth got to the qualifications after beating Amandine Hesse 6-3 6-4 and Anna Bondar 6-3 7-66.
In the qualifications, The American had a good straight sets win against Bondar (6-3 7-66). During the match, Mandlik scored 81 points vs Bondar’s 69. Elizabeth was pretty aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about the service games, Mandlik recorded 2 aces and she committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Elizabeth Mandlik was extremely effective on serve to win 71% (30/42) of her 1st serve and 63% (22/35) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent her to concede the serve once. Mandlik broke Bondar twice after converting 40% of her break points (2/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Mandlik started her run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, she hasn’t dropped yet a set in this competition to conquer 56% of the points she played.
Mandlik has a winning win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 58% of her matches (127-93). 7-10 on hard in 2023. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Mandlik has an overall77-47 match record in the last 7 years on hard.
The American’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in the Reus.
Mandlik has a composed 24-22 win-loss record in 2023, 7-10 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the U.S. Open
Na-Lae Han
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 20-20 | 20-15 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 48-18 | 39-13 | 6-3 | 3-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 21-30 | 14-14 | 6-13 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 3-4 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 243, the Korean got to the qualifications after beating Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva 6-3 6-3 and Lucrezia Stefanini 6-4 5-7 7-64.
In the qualifications, Han defeated Stefanini (6-4 5-7 7-64). During the match Han and Stefanini scored the same amount of points (124). However, the world no. 154 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. Han was quite aggressive to blast 46 winners.
Talking about serving, Han wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and she committed only 3 double faults. Na-Lae Han lost the serve 9 times and she saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Han put 85% of her first serves in, winning 49% (46/93) of the points behind her 1st serve and 56% (9/16) on the 2nd serve. The Korean broke Stefanini 9 times after converting 39% of her break points (9/23).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Korean started her run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, she has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 52% of the points she played.
Han’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in the W25 Kofu and the W25 Osaka.
Na-Lae has an aggregate 17-15 win-loss record in 2023, 17-10 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the U.S. Open
Previously, her best result was reaching the qualifications in 2016 and 2019. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Mandlik | Han |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 41 | 53 |
| Pts | 146-116 | 190-173 |
| Total Points | 262 | 363 |
| Winners | 52 | 70 |
| %Winners | 36% | 37% |
Both Mandlik and Han played 2 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Na-Lae Han lost 1 set while Elizabeth Mandlik hasn’t conceded a set so far. Mandlik has played 1 set(s) less than Han (4 vs 5). Therefore, Mandlik played 12 games less than Han. Mandlik scored 52 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, Han scored 70 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Mandlik | Han |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 0 |
| 1st in | 76/139 | 132/164 |
| %1st in | 55% | 80% |
| 1st pts | 52/76 | 70/132 |
| %1st pts | 68% | 53% |
| 2nd pts | 39/63 | 19/32 |
| %2nd pts | 62% | 59% |
Mandlik scored 4 aces (2 per match). Han didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Mandlik won 68% points behind her first serve. She pretty solid on her second serve to win 62% of the points. On the other side, Han won 53% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Mandlik | Han |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 14 |
| Converted | 6/14 | 14/31 |
| % Converted | 43% | 45% |
| Conceded | 11 | 16 |
| Saved | 8 | 5 |
| % Saved | 73% | 31% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 11 |
The American broke her opponents 6 times with a 43% conversion rate. The American dropped her serve 3 times and she saved 73% of the break points that she conceded. Han broke her opponents 14 times with a 45% conversion rate. The Korean conceded her serve 11 times and she saved 31% of the break points that she conceded.
| Mandlik | ||||
| Q1 Hesse |
Q2 Bondar |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | 6-3 7-66 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 22 | 41 | |
| pts | 65-47 | 81-69 | 146-116 | |
| Total points | 112 | 150 | 262 | |
| Winners | 22 | 30 | 52 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 37% | 36% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 34/62 | 42/77 | 76/139 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 22/34 | 30/42 | 52/76 | |
| % 1st pts | 65% | 71% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/28 | 22/35 | 39/63 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 63% | 62% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 2 | 6 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 2/5 | 6/14 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 40% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 4 | 11 | |
| Saved | 5/7 | 3/4 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 71% | 75% | 73% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
| Han | ||||
| Q1 Jimenez |
Q2 Stefanini |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | 6-4 5-7 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 35 | 53 | |
| pts | 66-49 | 124-124 | 190-173 | |
| Total points | 115 | 248 | 363 | |
| Winners | 24 | 46 | 70 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 39/55 | 93/109 | 132/164 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 85% | 80% | |
| 1st pts | 24/39 | 46/93 | 70/132 | |
| % 1st pts | 62% | 49% | 53% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/16 | 9/16 | 19/32 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 56% | 59% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 5 | 9 | 14 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 9/23 | 14/31 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 39% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 13 | 16 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 4/13 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 31% | 32% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 9 | 11 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWWLLWWL
LW Tennis Scores – U.S. Open
- Liam BroadyBroady – Filip PeliwoPeliwo (6-4 7-62) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Cameron NorrieNorrie – Patrick KypsonKypson (6-75 6-3 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Calvin HemeryHemery – Denis KudlaKudla (4-6 6-4 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Darian KingKing – Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald (2-6 6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Yuki BhambriBhambri – Elias YmerYmer (7-5 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Richard BerankisBerankis – Sergiy StakhovskyStakhovsky (3-6 6-3 6-0) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Michael MmohMmoh – Mirza BasicBasic (7-5 7-62) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Rogerio Dutra Da SilvaDutra Da Silva – Peter PolanskyPolansky (6-3 6-75 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alex De MinaurDe Minaur – Ruben BemelmansBemelmans (6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- John MillmanMillman – Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo (6-1 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Bjorn FratangeloFratangelo – Carlos BerlocqBerlocq (7-66 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis – Taro DanielDaniel (7-5 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Louisa ChiricoChirico – Olivia GadeckiGadecki (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Julia RieraRiera – Emina BektasBektas (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arianne HartonoHartono – Mai HontamaHontama (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Despina PapamichailPapamichail – Vera ZvonarevaZvonareva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Greetje MinnenMinnen – Sinja KrausKraus (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mccartney KesslerKessler – Su Jeong JangJeong Jang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Eva LysLys – Nuria Parrizas-DiazParrizas-Diaz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Viktoria KuzmovaKuzmova – Emiliana ArangoArango (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Valeria SavinykhSavinykh – Yuriko MiyazakiMiyazaki (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Priscilla HonHon – Himeno SakatsumeSakatsume (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Haruka KajiKaji – Kaja JuvanJuvan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Fiona CrawleyCrawley – Timea BabosBabos (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yafan WangWang – Ann LiLi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yanina WickmayerWickmayer – Sachia VickeryVickery (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Na-Lae HanHan – Elizabeth MandlikMandlik (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Laura SiegemundSiegemund – Oceane DodinDodin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dayana YastremskaYastremska – Elena Gabriela RuseGabriela Ruse (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Ankita RainaRaina – Mirjam BjorklundBjorklund (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Iga SwiatekSwiatek – Rebecca PetersonPeterson (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lauren DavisDavis – Danka KovinicKovinic (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Jelena OstapenkoOstapenko – Jasmine PaoliniPaolini (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alize CornetCornet – Elina AvanesyanAvanesyan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Julia GrabherGrabher – Xiyu WangWang (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bernarda PeraPera – Veronika KudermetovaKudermetova (2-3) – H2H and prediction
- Petra KvitovaKvitova – Cristina BucsaBucsa (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aliaksandra SasnovichSasnovich – Magda LinetteLinette (6-1) – H2H and prediction
- Danielle Rose CollinsRose Collins – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Elena RybakinaRybakina – Marta KostyukKostyuk (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Panna UdvardyUdvardy – Ajla TomljanovicTomljanovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anna KalinskayaKalinskaya – Katerina SiniakovaSiniakova (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Kayla DayDay – Sorana CirsteaCirstea (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Victoria AzarenkaAzarenka – Fiona FerroFerro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lin ZhuZhu – Mayar SherifSherif (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kamilla RakhimovaRakhimova – Belinda BencicBencic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Karolina MuchovaMuchova – Storm SandersSanders (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Magdalena FrechFrech – Emma NavarroNavarro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Varvara GrachevaGracheva – Taylor TownsendTownsend (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sloane StephensStephens – Beatriz Haddad MaiaHaddad Maia (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Anhelina KalininaKalinina – Sara Sorribes TormoSorribes Tormo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anna SchmiedlovaSchmiedlova – Kateryna KozlovaKozlova (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Rebeka MasarovaMasarova – Maria SakkariSakkari (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Katie BoulterBoulter – Diane ParryParry (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Peyton StearnsStearns – Viktoriya TomovaTomova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Clara TausonTauson – Anastasia PotapovaPotapova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ekaterina AlexandrovaAlexandrova – Leylah Annie FernandezAnnie Fernandez (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Bianca Vanessa AndreescuVanessa Andreescu – Lesya TsurenkoTsurenko (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Martina TrevisanTrevisan – Yulia PutintsevaPutintseva (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ludmilla SamsonovaSamsonova – Claire LiuLiu (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Irina-Camelia BeguBegu – Tamara KorpatschKorpatsch (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arantxa RusRus – Madison KeysKeys (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Elina SvitolinaSvitolina – Anna-Lena FriedsamFriedsam (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patricia Maria TigMaria Tig – Rebecca MarinoMarino (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Camila GiorgiGiorgi – Jessica PegulaPegula (2-8) – H2H and prediction
- Ons JabeurJabeur – Maria Camila Osorio SerranoCamila Osorio Serrano (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tatjana MariaMaria – Petra MarticMartic (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Qinwen ZhengZheng – Nadia PodoroskaPodoroska (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Barbora StrycovaStrycova – Kaia KanepiKanepi (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lucia BronzettiBronzetti – Barbora KrejcikovaKrejcikova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Darya KasatkinaKasatkina – Alycia ParksParks (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ana BogdanBogdan – Sofia KeninKenin (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Paula Badosa GibertBadosa Gibert – Venus WilliamsWilliams (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Caroline DolehideDolehide – Clara BurelBurel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anna BlinkovaBlinkova – Jodie Anna BurrageAnna Burrage (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maryna ZanevskaZanevska – Aryna SabalenkaSabalenka (0-0) – H2H and prediction
