Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco and Gonzalo Lama will face off in the quarter of the Lima Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 2:00 pm on CANCHA 9. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco is the pick to win this match.
Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco -> 1.53
Gonzalo Lama -> 2.42
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco vs. Gonzalo Lama
There is no head to head record between Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco and Gonzalo Lama since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 48-31 | 1-1 | 47-29 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 49-32 | 0-0 | 49-32 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 55-28 | 1-4 | 54-24 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 18-13 | 3-2 | 15-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 287 (career-high), Alejandro Dellien Velasco got to the quarter after defeating Mateus Alves 6-1 2-6 6-0 and Pedro Sakamoto 5-7 6-0 6-0.
In the 2nd round against Sakamoto, The Bolivian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 6-0 6-0). During the match, Alejandro Dellien Velasco scored 89 points vs Sakamoto’s 62. Murkel was quite aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about the service games, Alejandro Dellien Velasco scored just 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 4 double faults. Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco lost the serve 3 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Alejandro Dellien Velasco put 61% of his first serves in, winning 56% (24/43) of the points behind his 1st serve and 68% (19/28) on the 2nd serve. Alejandro Dellien Velasco broke Sakamoto 8 times after converting 53% of his break points (8/15).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Alejandro Dellien Velasco has conceded 2 set in this tournament to conquer 59% of the points he played.
Alejandro Dellien Velasco has a solid win-loss record in the last 5 years having won 64% of his matches (121-69). 40-22 on clay in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Alejandro Dellien Velasco has an aggregate111-60 match record in the last 5 years on clay.
The Bolivian’s best result of the season was reaching the final in the Tigre 1 Challenger and M25 Rio Cuarto.
Murkel has an aggregate 40-22 win-loss record in 2023, 40-22 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lima Challenger
The Bolivian has never competed in this tournament before.
Gonzalo Lama
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 18-29 | 3-4 | 15-25 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 39-29 | 0-0 | 39-28 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2021 | 49-19 | 0-1 | 49-18 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 21-16 | 1-4 | 20-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 430, the Chilean reached the quarter after defeating Jorge Brian Panta Herreros 6-74 6-4 7-5 and Juan Bautista Otegui 7-68 6-4.
In the 2nd round, Lama had a good straight sets win against Bautista Otegui (7-68 6-4). During the match Lama scored 87 points vs Bautista Otegui’s 81. The Chilean was extremely aggressive to blast 35 winners.
About the serving games, Lama scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 2 double faults. Gonzalo Lama lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Lama put 60% of his first serves in, winning 70% (35/50) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (16/33) on the 2nd serve. The Chilean broke Bautista Otegui 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Chilean has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 52% of the points he played.
Gonzalo has an overall 13-21 win-loss record in 2023, 11-19 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Alejandro Dellien Velasco | Lama |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 2 |
Tot Set | 6 | 5 |
Tot Games | 45 | 58 |
Pts | 168-119 | 213-200 |
Total Points | 287 | 413 |
Winners | 60 | 80 |
%Winners | 36% | 38% |
Both Alejandro Dellien Velasco and Lama played 2 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco conceded 2 sets, while Gonzalo Lama dropped 1 set. Alejandro Dellien Velasco has played 1 set more than Lama (6 vs 5). However, it’s interesting to notice that Alejandro Dellien Velasco played 13 games less than Lama. The Bolivian scored 60 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, The Chilean bagged 80 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Alejandro Dellien Velasco | Lama |
---|---|---|
Aces | 4 | 8 |
Avg per match | 2 | 4 |
1st in | 96/141 | 123/195 |
%1st in | 68% | 63% |
1st pts | 60/96 | 80/123 |
%1st pts | 63% | 65% |
2nd pts | 28/45 | 36/72 |
%2nd pts | 62% | 50% |
Alejandro Dellien Velasco made 4 aces (2 per match). Lama fired 8 aces (4 per match). Alejandro Dellien Velasco won 63% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 62% of the points. On the other side, Lama won 65% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Alejandro Dellien Velasco | Lama |
---|---|---|
Won | 13 | 10 |
Converted | 13/23 | 10/28 |
% Converted | 57% | 36% |
Conceded | 10 | 17 |
Saved | 5 | 10 |
% Saved | 50% | 59% |
Times Broken | 5 | 7 |
Alejandro Dellien Velasco broke his opponents 13 times with a 57% conversion rate. The Bolivian dropped his serve 5 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Lama broke his opponents 10 times with a 36% conversion rate. Gonzalo conceded his serve 7 times and he saved 59% of the break points that he conceded.
Alejandro Dellien Velasco | ||||
R1 Alves |
R2 Sakamoto |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 2-6 6-0 | 5-7 6-0 6-0 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
Tot Games | 21 | 24 | 45 | |
pts | 79-57 | 89-62 | 168-119 | |
Total points | 136 | 151 | 287 | |
Winners | 36 | 24 | 60 | |
%Winners | 46% | 27% | 36% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 4 | 7 | |
1st in | 53/70 | 43/71 | 96/141 | |
% 1st in | 76% | 61% | 68% | |
1st pts | 36/53 | 24/43 | 60/96 | |
% 1st pts | 68% | 56% | 63% | |
2nd pts | 9/17 | 19/28 | 28/45 | |
% 2nd pts | 53% | 68% | 62% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 5 | 8 | 13 | |
Converted | 5/8 | 8/15 | 13/23 | |
Converted % | 63% | 53% | 57% | |
Conceded | 4 | 6 | 10 | |
Saved | 2/4 | 3/6 | 5 | |
Saved % | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 3 | 5 |
Lama | ||||
R1 Brian Panta Herreros |
R2 Bautista |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-74 6-4 7-5 | 7-68 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
Tot Games | 35 | 23 | 58 | |
pts | 126-119 | 87-81 | 213-200 | |
Total points | 245 | 168 | 413 | |
Winners | 45 | 35 | 80 | |
%Winners | 36% | 40% | 38% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 7 | 1 | 8 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
1st in | 73/112 | 50/83 | 123/195 | |
% 1st in | 65% | 60% | 63% | |
1st pts | 45/73 | 35/50 | 80/123 | |
% 1st pts | 62% | 70% | 65% | |
2nd pts | 20/39 | 16/33 | 36/72 | |
% 2nd pts | 51% | 48% | 50% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 7 | 3 | 10 | |
Converted | 7/19 | 3/9 | 10/28 | |
Converted % | 37% | 33% | 36% | |
Conceded | 11 | 6 | 17 | |
Saved | 6/11 | 4/6 | 10 | |
Saved % | 55% | 67% | 61% | |
Times Broken | 5 | 2 | 7 |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Murkel Alejandro Dellien VelascoAlejandro Dellien Velasco – Gonzalo LamaLama (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alvaro Guillen MezaGuillen Meza – Arklon Huertas Del PinoHuertas Del Pino (1-4) – H2H and prediction