Constant Lestienne and Emilio Nava will face off in the final of the Stanford Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Saturday at 3:30 pm on COURT 1. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Constant Lestienne who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Constant Lestienne is the pick to win this match.
Constant Lestienne -> 1.7
Emilio Nava -> 2.09
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Constant Lestienne vs. Emilio Nava
There is no head to head record between Constant Lestienne and Emilio Nava since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Constant Lestienne
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 19-25 | 12-13 | 0-3 | 4-5 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 32-29 | 22-12 | 0-5 | 7-6 | 3-6 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 51-27 | 25-6 | 4-7 | 18-11 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 24-20 | 10-3 | 4-9 | 10-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-14 | 2-2 | 1-5 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 105, Constant reached the final after defeating Dane Sweeny 2-6 7-66 7-612, Alexander Cozbinov 6-2 6-2, Borna Gojo 6-2 6-2 and Yosuke Watanuki w/o.
In the semifinal, The French player defeated Watanuki (w/o). During the match, Lestienne and Watanuki scored the same amount of points (). However, the world no. 105 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. Lestienne was not very aggressive to strike just winners.
Talking about the service games, Lestienne wasn’t able to score even 1 ace throughout the encounter and he was very solid in conceding no double faults. Constant Lestienne conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 0% of his first serves in, win 0% (0) of the points behind his 1st serve and 0% (0) on the 2nd serve.
Overall Performance in this tournament
Constant has conceded 1 set in this competition to conquer 54% of the points he played.
Lestienne has winning record in the last 10 years having won 58% of his matches (349-248). 8-8 on hard in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Lestienne has a compiled 67-34 record in the last years on hard.
The French player best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in Auckland and the Stanford Challenger.
The French player has a composed 13-21 win-loss record in 2023, 8-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Stanford Challenger
Lestienne has never competed in this tournament before.
Emilio Nava
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 29-29 | 15-14 | 8-8 | 4-2 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-31 | 24-14 | 12-8 | 4-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-27 | 15-15 | 14-6 | 12-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 40-16 | 9-6 | 27-7 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-12 | 10-7 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 187, Nava got to the final after beating Calum Puttergill 6-1 6-3, Evan Burnett 6-1 6-1, Ethan Quinn 6-1 6-2, Federico Gaio 6-4 6-4, Aleksandar Kovacevic 7-62 7-64 and Tristan Boyer 2-6 7-64 6-1.
In the semifinal against Boyer, Nava recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 7-64 6-1).During the match Nava scored less points (3) than Boyer. In fact, the world no. 105 won 78 points vs Boyer’s. That means that Nava was more focused during the important points. The American was quite aggressive to blast 35 winners.
About the serving games, Nava struck 11 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Emilio Nava lost the serve 4 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Nava put 57% of his first serves in, winning 71% (35/49) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (16/37) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Boyer 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Nava started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 57% of the points he played.
His best result of the season was winning the title the Modena Challenger where he beat Titouan Droguet in the final 6-7(5) 7-6(6) 6-4.
Emilio has an aggregate 28-21 win-loss record in 2023, 16-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Lestienne | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 6 |
| Tot Set | 7 | 13 |
| Tot Games | 66 | 119 |
| Pts | 256-215 | 394-299 |
| Total Points | 471 | 693 |
| Winners | 104 | 166 |
| %Winners | 41% | 42% |
Lestienne played 3 matches while Nava competed in 6 matches. Nava started his run from the qualifications while Lestienne had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Constant Lestienne surrendered 1 set, while Emilio Nava surrendered 1 set. Lestienne has played 6 set(s) less than Nava (7 vs 13). Therefore, Lestienne played 53 games less than Nava. Lestienne scored 104 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Nava bagged 166 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Lestienne | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 19 | 41 |
| Avg per match | 6.3 | 6.8 |
| 1st in | 136/223 | 213/340 |
| %1st in | 61% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 104/136 | 166/213 |
| %1st pts | 76% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 40/87 | 78/127 |
| %2nd pts | 46% | 61% |
Lestienne blasted 19 aces (6.3 per match). Nava bagged 41 aces (6.8 per match). Lestienne won 76% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 46% of the points. On the other side, Nava won 78% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Lestienne | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 10 | 20 |
| Converted | 10/29 | 20/32 |
| % Converted | 34% | 63% |
| Conceded | 19 | 13 |
| Saved | 15 | 8 |
| % Saved | 79% | 62% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 5 |
Lestienne broke his opponents 10 times with a 34% conversion rate. Lestienne dropped his serve 4 times and he saved 79% of the break points that he conceded. Emilio broke his opponents 20 times with a 63% conversion rate. Emilio conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 62% of the break points that he conceded.
| Lestienne | ||||||
| R1 Sweeny |
R2 Cozbinov |
1/4 Gojo |
1/2 Watanuki |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 2-6 7-66 7-612 | 6-2 6-2 | 6-2 6-2 | w/o | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | – | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 34 | 16 | 16 | – | 66 | |
| pts | 124-121 | 64-46 | 68-48 | – | 256-215 | |
| Total points | 245 | 110 | 116 | – | 471 | |
| Winners | 52 | 26 | 26 | – | 104 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 41% | 38% | – | 41% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 6 | 4 | 9 | – | 19 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 4 | 4 | – | 15 | |
| 1st in | 69/109 | 35/61 | 32/53 | – | 136/223 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 57% | 60% | – | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 52/69 | 26/35 | 26/32 | – | 104/136 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 74% | 81% | – | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/40 | 14/26 | 10/21 | – | 40/87 | |
| % 2nd pts | 40% | 54% | 48% | – | 46% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 2 | 4 | 4 | – | 10 | |
| Converted | 2/8 | 4/7 | 4/14 | – | 10/29 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 57% | 29% | – | 34% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 6 | 4 | – | 19 | |
| Saved | 5/9 | 6/6 | 4/4 | – | 15 | |
| Saved % | 56% | 100% | 100% | – | 64% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 0 | 0 | – | 4 | |
| Nava | ||||||||
| Q1 Puttergill |
Q3 Burnett |
R1 Quinn |
R2 Gaio |
1/4 Kovacevic |
1/2 Boyer |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-3 | 6-1 6-1 | 6-1 6-2 | 6-4 6-4 | 7-62 7-64 | 2-6 7-64 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 13 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 14 | 15 | 20 | 26 | 28 | 119 | |
| pts | 66-46 | 59-27 | 53-28 | 60-46 | 78-71 | 78-81 | 394-299 | |
| Total points | 112 | 86 | 81 | 106 | 149 | 159 | 693 | |
| Winners | 20 | 20 | 27 | 33 | 31 | 35 | 166 | |
| %Winners | 30% | 34% | 51% | 55% | 40% | 45% | 42% | |
| SERVE | ||||||||
| Aces | 7 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 11 | 41 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 10 | |
| 1st in | 25/45 | 28/46 | 32/41 | 39/49 | 40/73 | 49/86 | 213/340 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 61% | 78% | 80% | 55% | 57% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 20/25 | 20/28 | 27/32 | 33/39 | 31/40 | 35/49 | 166/213 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 71% | 84% | 85% | 78% | 71% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/20 | 13/18 | 6/9 | 7/10 | 23/33 | 16/37 | 78/127 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 72% | 67% | 70% | 70% | 43% | 61% | |
| Breaks | ||||||||
| Won | 4 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 20 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 5/6 | 4/7 | 2/3 | 1/3 | 4/5 | 20/32 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 83% | 57% | 67% | 33% | 80% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 13 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 1/1 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1/2 | 4/8 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | – | – | 50% | 50% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLLWLWWW
LWLWWWLLLW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Emilio NavaNava – Constant LestienneLestienne (0-0) – H2H and prediction
