Emilio Nava and Tristan Boyer will clash against each other in the semifinal of the Stanford Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 8:30 pm on COURT 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Emilio Nava who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Emilio Nava is the pick to win this match.
Emilio Nava -> 1.41
Tristan Boyer -> 2.8
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Emilio Nava vs. Tristan Boyer
There is no head to head record between Emilio Nava and Tristan Boyer since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Emilio Nava
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 34-34 | 16-15 | 8-9 | 8-5 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-31 | 24-14 | 12-8 | 4-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-27 | 15-15 | 14-6 | 12-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 40-16 | 9-6 | 27-7 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-12 | 10-7 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 187, the American got to the semifinal after defeating Calum Puttergill 6-1 6-3, Evan Burnett 6-1 6-1, Ethan Quinn 6-1 6-2, Federico Gaio 6-4 6-4 and Aleksandar Kovacevic 7-62 7-64.
In the quarter, Emilio had a good straight sets win against Kovacevic (7-62 7-64). During the match, Nava scored 78 points vs Kovacevic’s 71. The American was exceptionally aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Regarding the service games, Nava made 8 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Emilio Nava was pretty effective on serve to win 78% (31/40) of his 1st serve and 70% (23/33) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The American broke Kovacevic once after converting 33% of his break points (1/3).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The American started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t lost yet a set in this event to win 59% of the points he played.
Nava has a solid match record in the last 6 years having won 61% of his matches (140-90). 15-8 on hard in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Nava has a compiled63-48 record in the last 6 years on hard.
His best result of the current year was winning the title the Modena Challenger where he overcame Titouan Droguet in the final 6-7(5) 7-6(6) 6-4.
Nava has a compiled 27-21 win-loss record in 2023, 15-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Stanford Challenger
Emilio has never competed in this tournament before.
Tristan Boyer
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 44-29 | 15-12 | 27-15 | 2-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 33-23 | 15-11 | 18-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 5-2 | 4-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 15-12 | 11-8 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 492, Tristan got to the semifinal after beating Anders Matta 6-3 6-0, Colin Markes 6-1 6-3, Bradley Klahn 6-3 7-62, Sho Shimabukuro 7-5 7-68 and Michael Mmoh 7-5 7-65.
In the quarter, Tristan had a good straight sets win against Mmoh (7-5 7-65). During the match Boyer scored 103 points vs Mmoh’s 91. Boyer was exceptionally aggressive to blast 41 winners.
About the serving games, Boyer recorded 8 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Tristan Boyer lost the serve twice and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Boyer put 66% of his first serves in, winning 69% (41/59) of the points behind his 1st serve and 63% (19/30) on the 2nd serve. Boyer broke Mmoh 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Tristan started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t dropped yet a set in this competition to win 56% of the points he played.
Tristan’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in the Savannah Challenger.
Tristan has an overall 25-15 win-loss record in 2023, 13-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Nava | Boyer |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 5 | 5 |
| Tot Set | 10 | 10 |
| Tot Games | 91 | 103 |
| Pts | 316-218 | 368-284 |
| Total Points | 534 | 652 |
| Winners | 131 | 154 |
| %Winners | 41% | 42% |
Both Nava and Boyer played 5 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Nava and Boyer have played the same amount of sets 10. However, Nava played 12 games less than Boyer. The American scored 131 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Tristan managed to score 154 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Nava | Boyer |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 30 | 29 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 5.8 |
| 1st in | 164/254 | 203/305 |
| %1st in | 65% | 67% |
| 1st pts | 131/164 | 154/203 |
| %1st pts | 80% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 62/90 | 62/102 |
| %2nd pts | 69% | 61% |
Nava managed to score 30 aces (6 per match). Boyer struck 29 aces (5.8 per match). Nava won 80% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 69% of the points. On the other side, Boyer won 76% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Nava | Boyer |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 16 | 17 |
| Converted | 16/27 | 17/33 |
| % Converted | 59% | 52% |
| Conceded | 5 | 11 |
| Saved | 4 | 5 |
| % Saved | 80% | 45% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 6 |
The American broke his opponents 16 times with a 59% conversion rate. Emilio surrendered his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponents 17 times with a 52% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 45% of the break points that he conceded.
| Nava | |||||||
| Q1 Puttergill |
Q3 Burnett |
R1 Quinn |
R2 Gaio |
1/4 Kovacevic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-3 | 6-1 6-1 | 6-1 6-2 | 6-4 6-4 | 7-62 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 14 | 15 | 20 | 26 | 91 | |
| pts | 66-46 | 59-27 | 53-28 | 60-46 | 78-71 | 316-218 | |
| Total points | 112 | 86 | 81 | 106 | 149 | 534 | |
| Winners | 20 | 20 | 27 | 33 | 31 | 131 | |
| %Winners | 30% | 34% | 51% | 55% | 40% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||||||
| Aces | 7 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 30 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 25/45 | 28/46 | 32/41 | 39/49 | 40/73 | 164/254 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 61% | 78% | 80% | 55% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 20/25 | 20/28 | 27/32 | 33/39 | 31/40 | 131/164 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 71% | 84% | 85% | 78% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/20 | 13/18 | 6/9 | 7/10 | 23/33 | 62/90 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 72% | 67% | 70% | 70% | 69% | |
| Breaks | |||||||
| Won | 4 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 16 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 5/6 | 4/7 | 2/3 | 1/3 | 16/27 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 83% | 57% | 67% | 33% | 59% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 1/1 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1/2 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | – | – | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Boyer | |||||||
| Q1 Matta |
Q3 Markes |
R1 Klahn |
R2 Shimabukuro |
1/4 Mmoh |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-0 | 6-1 6-3 | 6-3 7-62 | 7-5 7-68 | 7-5 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 16 | 22 | 25 | 25 | 103 | |
| pts | 54-28 | 61-38 | 71-52 | 79-75 | 103-91 | 368-284 | |
| Total points | 82 | 99 | 123 | 154 | 194 | 652 | |
| Winners | 23 | 22 | 31 | 37 | 41 | 154 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 36% | 44% | 47% | 40% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||||||
| Aces | 3 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 29 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 25/37 | 26/42 | 39/56 | 54/81 | 59/89 | 203/305 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 62% | 70% | 67% | 66% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 23/25 | 22/26 | 31/39 | 37/54 | 41/59 | 154/203 | |
| % 1st pts | 92% | 85% | 79% | 69% | 69% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/12 | 10/16 | 11/17 | 13/27 | 19/30 | 62/102 | |
| % 2nd pts | 75% | 63% | 65% | 48% | 63% | 61% | |
| Breaks | |||||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 17 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 4/11 | 2/3 | 4/5 | 3/9 | 17/33 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 36% | 67% | 80% | 33% | 52% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 11 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/1 | 3/6 | 2/4 | 5 | |
| Saved % | – | – | 0% | 50% | 50% | 20% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWWLLWL
WWWWWLLWWW Tennis Scores in Stanford Challenger
- Tristan BoyerBoyer – Michael MmohMmoh (7-5 7-65) – See score progression
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – James DuckworthDuckworth (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Emilio NavaNava – Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic (7-62 7-64) – See score progression
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Borna GojoGojo (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Emilio NavaNava – Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic (7-6(2) 7-6(4)) – See score progression
- Tristan BoyerBoyer – Michael MmohMmoh (7-5 7-6(5)) – See score progression
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – James DuckworthDuckworth (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emilio NavaNava – Tristan BoyerBoyer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
