Elias Ymer and Jesper De Jong will play each other in the semifinal of the Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 2:00 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jesper De Jong who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jesper De Jong is the pick to win this match.
Jesper De Jong -> 1.84
Elias Ymer -> 1.92
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Elias Ymer vs. Jesper De Jong
There is no head to head record between Elias Ymer and Jesper De Jong since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Elias Ymer
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 20-29 | 5-13 | 6-9 | 6-6 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 42-41 | 10-13 | 24-17 | 7-10 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 39-32 | 12-11 | 20-15 | 5-4 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 35-29 | 9-9 | 20-11 | 6-8 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 10-12 | 1-4 | 8-6 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 181, the Swede got to the semifinal after beating David Poljak 6-4 6-3, Jules Marie 4-6 6-3 6-4 and Kacper Zuk 6-3 6-4.
In the quarter, Ymer had a good straight sets win against Zuk (6-3 6-4). During the match, Ymer scored 74 points vs Zuk’s 63. The Swede was exceptionally aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about the service games, Ymer made 10 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Elias Ymer lost the serve twice and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Ymer put 63% of his first serves in, winning 67% (33/49) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (13/29) on the 2nd serve. The Swede broke Zuk 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Elias has dropped 1 set in this competition to win 54% of the points he played.
Ymer has positive match record in the last 10 years having won 56% of his matches (335-264). 8-7 on hard in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Ymer has a compiled 66-73 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
Ymer has an overall 29-23 win-loss record in 2023, 8-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger
Ymer has never competed in this tournament before.
Jesper De Jong
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 48-25 | 12-5 | 33-15 | 2-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 52-23 | 19-4 | 30-14 | 0-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-28 | 12-7 | 10-13 | 2-5 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 32-29 | 2-6 | 27-18 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 31-12 | 7-3 | 14-5 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 183, the Dutch reached the semifinal after defeating Santiago Rodriguez Taverna 6-3 4-3 ret., Charles Broom 6-4 6-4 and Maks Kasnikowski 6-0 6-2.
In the quarter, De had a good straight sets win against Kasnikowski (6-0 6-2). During the match De scored 58 points vs Kasnikowski’s 30. The Dutch was very aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Talking about serving, De managed to score 6 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Jesper De Jong was pretty efficient on serve to win 91% (21/23) of his 1st serve and 64% (7/11) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Dutch broke Kasnikowski 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Jesper hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 58% of the points he played.
The Dutch’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in the Tigre 2 Challenger,M25 Quinta Do Lago and the Rome Challenger.
The Dutch has an aggregate 46-19 win-loss record in 2023, 13-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Ymer | De |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 7 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 67 | 50 |
| Pts | 233-201 | 196-143 |
| Total Points | 434 | 339 |
| Winners | 95 | 73 |
| %Winners | 41% | 37% |
Both Ymer and De played 3 matches. At the moment, Elias Ymer lost 1 set while Jesper De Jong hasn’t dropped a set so far. Talking about their workload, Ymer and De have played the same amount of sets 7. However, Ymer played 17 games more than De. Ymer scored 95 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Jesper bagged 73 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Ymer | De |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 16 | 15 |
| Avg per match | 5.3 | 5 |
| 1st in | 128/217 | 91/152 |
| %1st in | 59% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 95/128 | 73/91 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 80% |
| 2nd pts | 46/89 | 37/61 |
| %2nd pts | 52% | 61% |
Ymer managed to score 16 aces (5.3 per match). De struck 15 aces (5 per match). Ymer won 74% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, De won 80% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Ymer | De |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 11 | 11 |
| Converted | 11/26 | 11/31 |
| % Converted | 42% | 35% |
| Conceded | 19 | 10 |
| Saved | 13 | 8 |
| % Saved | 68% | 80% |
| Times Broken | 6 | 2 |
Elias broke his opponents 11 times with a 42% conversion rate. The Swede dropped his serve 6 times and he saved 68% of the break points that he conceded. The Dutch broke his opponents 11 times with a 35% conversion rate. The Dutch conceded his serve twice and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded.
| Ymer | |||||
| R1 Poljak |
R2 Marie |
1/4 Zuk |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 29 | 19 | 67 | |
| pts | 71-58 | 88-80 | 74-63 | 233-201 | |
| Total points | 129 | 168 | 137 | 434 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | 33 | 95 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 35% | 45% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | 10 | 16 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 38/61 | 41/78 | 49/78 | 128/217 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 53% | 63% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 31/38 | 31/41 | 33/49 | 95/128 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 76% | 67% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/23 | 20/37 | 13/29 | 46/89 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 54% | 45% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 2 | 5 | 4 | 11 | |
| Converted | 2/7 | 5/12 | 4/7 | 11/26 | |
| Converted % | 29% | 42% | 57% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 8 | 9 | 19 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 4/8 | 7/9 | 13 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 50% | 78% | 76% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6 | |
| De | |||||
| R1 Rodriguez Taverna |
R2 Broom |
1/4 Kasnikowski |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 4-3 ret. | 6-4 6-4 | 6-0 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 20 | 14 | 50 | |
| pts | 65-48 | 73-65 | 58-30 | 196-143 | |
| Total points | 113 | 138 | 88 | 339 | |
| Winners | 23 | 29 | 21 | 73 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 40% | 36% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 2 | 7 | 6 | 15 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 24/45 | 44/73 | 23/34 | 91/152 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 60% | 68% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 23/24 | 29/44 | 21/23 | 73/91 | |
| % 1st pts | 96% | 66% | 91% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/21 | 16/29 | 7/11 | 37/61 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 55% | 64% | 61% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 2 | 4 | 5 | 11 | |
| Converted | 2/12 | 4/10 | 5/9 | 11/31 | |
| Converted % | 17% | 40% | 56% | 35% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 8/10 | 0/0 | 8 | |
| Saved % | – | 80% | – | 27% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLLWWLWL
LWWLLWWWWL Tennis Scores in Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger
- Benjamin HassanHassan – Marius CopilCopil (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Anirudh Chandrasekar/N. Vijay Sundar PrashanthChandrasekar/N. Vijay Sundar Prashanth – Akira Santillan/Jose StathamSantillan/Jose Statham (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Elias YmerYmer – Kacper ZukZuk (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Divij Sharan/Igor ZelenaySharan/Igor Zelenay – Ariel Behar/Adam PavlasekBehar/Adam Pavlasek (7-61 3-6 10-4) – See score progression
- Denis YevseyevYevseyev – Maxime JanvierJanvier (6-3 3-6 7-65) – See score progression
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Maks KasnikowskiKasnikowski (6-0 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Denis YevseyevYevseyev – Benjamin HassanHassan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Elias YmerYmer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
