Jesper De Jong and Charles Broom will square off in the 2nd round of the Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 11:00 am on COURT 12. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jesper De Jong who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jesper De Jong is the pick to win this match.
Jesper De Jong -> 1.33
Charles Broom -> 3.125
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jesper De Jong vs. Charles Broom
This will be the 2nd time that Jesper De Jong and Charles Broom clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for De Jong (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on hard.
The last time that they competed against each other, De Jong won 6-2 6-3 in the qualifications in the Tunis Challenger back in May 2023.
Jesper De Jong
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 48-25 | 12-5 | 33-15 | 2-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 52-23 | 19-4 | 30-14 | 0-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-28 | 12-7 | 10-13 | 2-5 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 32-29 | 2-6 | 27-18 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 31-12 | 7-3 | 14-5 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 183, De Jong got to the 2nd round after defeating Santiago Rodriguez Taverna 6-3 4-3 ret..
In the 1st round against Rodriguez Taverna, Jesper had a free pass after Rodriguez Taverna retired on a 6-3 4-3 . scoreline.
De Jong has a solid match record in the last 7 years having won 63% of his matches (197-118). 11-1 on hard in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, De Jong has an aggregate66-32 record in the last 7 years on hard.
De Jong’s best result of the year was reaching the final in the Tigre 2 Challenger,M25 Quinta Do Lago and the Rome Challenger.
De Jong has an aggregate 44-19 win-loss record in 2023, 11-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger
The Dutch has never competed in this tournament before.
Charles Broom
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 41-33 | 19-13 | 0-0 | 14-13 | 8-7 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 41-34 | 8-7 | 0-4 | 20-15 | 11-6 | 2-2 |
| 2022 | 44-30 | 28-17 | 0-0 | 10-7 | 6-6 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 35-10 | 20-6 | 8-3 | 7-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 7-3 | 7-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 356, Broom got to the 2nd round after defeating Ricardas Berankis 6-1 3-6 6-2.
In the 1st round, Broom defeated Berankis (6-1 3-6 6-2). During the match Broom scored 87 points vs Berankis’s 72. The Brit was exceptionally aggressive to blast 39 winners.
About the serving games, Broom struck 4 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Charles Broom lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Broom put 59% of his first serves in, winning 83% (39/47) of the points behind his 1st serve and 33% (11/33) on the 2nd serve. Charles was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Berankis 5 times.
Broom’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M25 Sheffield.
Charles has a composed 25-23 win-loss record in 2023, 4-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | De Jong | Broom |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 24 |
| Pts | 65-48 | 87-72 |
| Total Points | 113 | 159 |
| Winners | 23 | 39 |
| %Winners | 35% | 45% |
Both De Jong and Broom played 1 match. At the moment, Charles Broom lost 1 set while Jesper De Jong hasn’t conceded a set so far. Talking about their workload, De Jong and Broom have played the same amount of sets 3. However, De Jong played 8 games less than Broom. De Jong scored 23 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, The Brit scored 39 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | De Jong | Broom |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 4 |
| 1st in | 24/45 | 47/80 |
| %1st in | 53% | 59% |
| 1st pts | 23/24 | 39/47 |
| %1st pts | 96% | 83% |
| 2nd pts | 14/21 | 11/33 |
| %2nd pts | 67% | 33% |
De Jong blasted 2 aces . Broom recorded 4 aces . De Jong won 96% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 67% of the points. On the other side, Broom won 83% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 33% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | De Jong | Broom |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 5 |
| Converted | 2/12 | 5/5 |
| % Converted | 17% | 100% |
| Conceded | 0 | 5 |
| Saved | 0 | 3 |
| % Saved | 0% | 60% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
Jesper broke his opponent twice with a 17% conversion rate. The Dutch was rock solid on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 0 break points. Charles broke his opponent 5 times with a 100% conversion rate. Charles conceded his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded.
| De Jong | |||
| R1 Rodriguez Taverna |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 4-3 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 65-48 | 65-48 | |
| Total points | 113 | 113 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 24/45 | 24/45 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 23/24 | 23/24 | |
| % 1st pts | 96% | 96% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/21 | 14/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 67% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/12 | 2/12 | |
| Converted % | 17% | 17% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Broom | |||
| R1 Berankis |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 3-6 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 24 | 24 | |
| pts | 87-72 | 87-72 | |
| Total points | 159 | 159 | |
| Winners | 39 | 39 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 47/80 | 47/80 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 39/47 | 39/47 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/33 | 11/33 | |
| % 2nd pts | 33% | 33% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/5 | 5/5 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLLWWWWL
LLWLWWWLLW Tennis Scores in Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger
- Kacper ZukZuk – Akira SantillanSantillan (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Maks KasnikowskiKasnikowski – Stefanos SakellaridisSakellaridis (6-2 6-0) – See score progression
- Tomas MachacMachac – Filip PeliwoPeliwo (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Adria Soriano BarreraSoriano Barrera (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Marius CopilCopil – Kalin IvanovskiIvanovski (6-4 1-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Jiri VeselyVesely – Jelle SelsSels (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Elias YmerYmer – David PoljakPoljak (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Denis YevseyevYevseyev – Tomasz BerkietaBerkieta (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Jules MarieMarie – Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano (3-6 6-4 7-62) – See score progression
- Skander MansouriMansouri – Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva (7-64 6-3) – See score progression
- Peter GojowczykGojowczyk – Dali BlanchBlanch (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – Antoine BellierBellier (7-61 6-3) – See score progression
- Charles BroomBroom – Ricardas BerankisBerankis (6-1 3-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Santiago Rodriguez TavernaRodriguez Taverna (6-3 4-3 ret.) – See score progression
- Benjamin HassanHassan – Martyn PawelskiPawelski (6-2 6-0) – See score progression
- Viktor DurasovicDurasovic – Joris De LooreDe Loore (1-6 7-66 7-64) – See score progression
- Tomas MachacMachac – Filip PeliwoPeliwo (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Denis YevseyevYevseyev – Tomasz BerkietaBerkieta (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Skander MansouriMansouri – Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva (7-6(4) 6-3) – See score progression
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Adria Soriano BarreraSoriano Barrera (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Marius CopilCopil – Kalin IvanovskiIvanovski (6-4 1-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Jiri VeselyVesely – Jelle SelsSels (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Maks KasnikowskiKasnikowski – Stefanos SakellaridisSakellaridis (6-2 6-0) – See score progression
- Elias YmerYmer – David PoljakPoljak (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Jules MarieMarie – Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano (3-6 6-4 7-6(2)) – See score progression
- Kacper ZukZuk – Akira SantillanSantillan (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Peter GojowczykGojowczyk – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Marius CopilCopil (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elias YmerYmer – Jules MarieMarie (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – Skander MansouriMansouri (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin HassanHassan – Jiri VeselyVesely (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kacper ZukZuk – Viktor DurasovicDurasovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas MachacMachac – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Charles BroomBroom (1-0) – H2H and prediction
