Sumit Nagal and Federico Agustin Gomez will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Liberec Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 12:30 pm on PERNERKA COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Sumit Nagal who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Sumit Nagal is the pick to win this match.
Sumit Nagal -> 1.23
Federico Agustin Gomez -> 3.84
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Sumit Nagal vs. Federico Agustin Gomez
There is no head to head record between Sumit Nagal and Federico Agustin Gomez since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Sumit Nagal
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 19-11 | 15-8 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-29 | 9-8 | 32-17 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 17-18 | 0-1 | 16-17 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-26 | 1-4 | 22-22 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-14 | 2-4 | 5-5 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 179, Sumit got to the 2nd round after beating Andrew Paulson 6-0 7-65.
In the 1st round, Sumit had a good straight sets win against Paulson (6-0 7-65). During the match, Nagal scored 71 points vs Paulson’s 49. The Indian was pretty aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Regarding the service games, Nagal made 2 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Sumit Nagal lost the serve twice and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Nagal put 66% of his first serves in, winning 74% (28/38) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (10/20) on the 2nd serve. Sumit broke Paulson 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Nagal has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 61% of his matches (285-184). 24-11 on clay in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Nagal has an aggregate 201-115 record in the last years on clay.
His best result of the season was conquering the title the Rome Challenger where he defeated Jesper De Jong in the final 6-3 6-2 and the Tampere Challenger where he overcame Dalibor Svrcina in the final 6-4 7-5.
Nagal has an overall 32-18 win-loss record in 2023, 24-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Liberec Challenger
Federico Agustin Gomez
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 21-12 | 0-0 | 21-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 51-30 | 8-10 | 40-19 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 30-21 | 13-9 | 13-9 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
| 2021 | 28-10 | 23-5 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 538 (career-high), Federico reached the 2nd round after beating Jiri Barnat 1-6 6-3 7-65, Denys Klok 6-3 6-2 and Jiri Vesely 4-6 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round against Vesely, Agustin recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-3 6-4). During the match Agustin scored 89 points vs Vesely’s 80. Agustin was extremely aggressive to blast 43 winners.
About the serving games, Agustin fired 11 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Federico Agustin Gomez lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Agustin put 61% of his first serves in, winning 81% (43/53) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (17/34) on the 2nd serve. Federico broke Vesely 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Agustin’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M15 Naples.
Federico has an overall 29-16 win-loss record in 2023, 28-14 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Liberec Challenger
The Argentine has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Nagal | Agustin |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 75 |
| Pts | 71-49 | 251-230 |
| Total Points | 120 | 481 |
| Winners | 28 | 100 |
| %Winners | 39% | 40% |
Nagal played 1 match while Agustin competed in 3 matches. Agustin started his run from the qualifications while Nagal had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Federico Agustin Gomez surrendered 2 sets while Sumit Nagal hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Nagal has played 6 set(s) less than Agustin (2 vs 8). Therefore, Nagal played 56 games less than Agustin. Sumit scored 28 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Federico bagged 100 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Nagal | Agustin |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 21 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 7 |
| 1st in | 38/58 | 135/238 |
| %1st in | 66% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 28/38 | 100/135 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 10/20 | 51/103 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 50% |
Nagal scored 2 aces . Agustin blasted 21 aces (7 per match). Nagal won 74% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Agustin won 74% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Nagal | Agustin |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 11 |
| Converted | 5/8 | 11/22 |
| % Converted | 63% | 50% |
| Conceded | 7 | 21 |
| Saved | 5 | 14 |
| % Saved | 71% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 7 |
Nagal broke his opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. Sumit surrendered his serve twice and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded. Agustin broke his opponents 11 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Argentine conceded his serve 7 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Nagal | |||
| R1 Paulson |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 71-49 | 71-49 | |
| Total points | 120 | 120 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 38/58 | 38/58 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 28/38 | 28/38 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/20 | 10/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 5/7 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 71% | 71% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Agustin | |||||
| Q1 Barnat |
Q3 Klok |
R1 Vesely |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 1-6 6-3 7-65 | 6-3 6-2 | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 17 | 29 | 75 | |
| pts | 95-98 | 67-52 | 89-80 | 251-230 | |
| Total points | 193 | 119 | 169 | 481 | |
| Winners | 35 | 22 | 43 | 100 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 33% | 48% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 6 | 4 | 11 | 21 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 1 | 5 | 11 | |
| 1st in | 54/97 | 28/54 | 53/87 | 135/238 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 52% | 61% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 35/54 | 22/28 | 43/53 | 100/135 | |
| % 1st pts | 65% | 79% | 81% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/43 | 12/26 | 17/34 | 51/103 | |
| % 2nd pts | 51% | 46% | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 5 | 3 | 11 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 5/8 | 3/7 | 11/22 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 63% | 43% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 8 | 6 | 21 | |
| Saved | 3/7 | 7/8 | 4/6 | 14 | |
| Saved % | 43% | 88% | 67% | 198% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 1 | 2 | 7 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWWLWLWL
LWWWWLWLWW Tennis Scores in Liberec Challenger
- Gerard Campana LeeCampana Lee – Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic (6-4 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Hernan CasanovaCasanova – Miljan ZekicZekic (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Sumit NagalNagal – Andrew PaulsonPaulson (6-0 7-65) – See score progression
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – Jiri VeselyVesely (4-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Toby Alex KodatAlex Kodat – Timo StodderStodder (3-6 6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Riccardo BonadioBonadio – Matheus Pucinelli De AlmeidaPucinelli De Almeida (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Jakub MensikMensik (6-3 1-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Tomas MachacMachac – Alex Marti PujolrasMarti Pujolras (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Maks KasnikowskiKasnikowski (3-6 7-60 6-3) – See score progression
- Michael VrbenskyVrbensky – Valentin RoyerRoyer (6-4 2-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Francisco ComesanaComesana – Constantin Bittoun KouzmineBittoun Kouzmine (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Dino PrizmicPrizmic – Kirill KivattsevKivattsev (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Norbert GombosGombos – Giovanni FonioFonio (7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Lukas KleinKlein – Joao Lucas Reis Da SilvaLucas Reis Da Silva (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Ugo BlanchetBlanchet – Hynek BartonBarton (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Daniel MichalskiMichalski – Max HoukesHoukes (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Tomas MachacMachac – Alex Marti PujolrasMarti Pujolras (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Gerard Campana LeeCampana Lee – Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic (6-4 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Riccardo BonadioBonadio – Matheus Pucinelli De AlmeidaPucinelli De Almeida (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Hernan CasanovaCasanova – Riccardo BonadioBonadio (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sumit NagalNagal – Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Ugo BlanchetBlanchet (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas MachacMachac – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francisco ComesanaComesana – Michael VrbenskyVrbensky (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel MichalskiMichalski – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (1-0) – H2H and prediction
