Hamad Medjedovic and Lukas Neumayer will face off in the qualifications of the Generali Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 1:30 pm on CENTER COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Hamad Medjedovic who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Hamad Medjedovic is the pick to win this match.
Hamad Medjedovic -> 1.47
Lukas Neumayer -> 2.54
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Hamad Medjedovic vs. Lukas Neumayer
There is no head to head record between Hamad Medjedovic and Lukas Neumayer since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Hamad Medjedovic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 35-21 | 9-6 | 15-8 | 9-5 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 48-23 | 10-5 | 22-9 | 11-7 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 46-24 | 12-10 | 28-6 | 6-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 13-13 | 0-0 | 13-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 146 (career-high), Medjedovic got to the qualifications after beating Lucas Miedler 6-4 7-64.
In the qualifications, Medjedovic had a good straight sets win against Miedler (6-4 7-64). During the match, Medjedovic scored 80 points vs Miedler’s 72. The Serbian was quite aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Talking about the service games, Medjedovic managed to score 19 aces and he committed only 9 double faults. Hamad Medjedovic lost the serve twice and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Medjedovic put 62% of his first serves in, winning 78% (36/46) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (12/28) on the 2nd serve. The Serbian broke Miedler 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Medjedovic has a solid record in the last 5 years having won 63% of his matches (95-56). 21-8 on clay in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Medjedovic has a compiled63-28 record in the last 5 years on clay.
His best result of the season was winning the title the Szekesfehervar Challenger where he defeated Nino Serdarusic in the final 6-4 6-3 and the Mauthausen Challenger where he beat Filip Misolic in the final 6-2 6-7(5) 6-4.
The Serbian has an aggregate 33-16 win-loss record in 2023, 21-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Kitzbuhel
Lukas Neumayer
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 40-32 | 2-2 | 38-29 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-32 | 2-1 | 38-28 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 53-26 | 12-4 | 41-21 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 26-25 | 8-10 | 16-14 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-3 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 255, Neumayer reached the qualifications after defeating Federico Coria 6-1 6-2.
In the qualifications, The Austrian had a good straight sets win against Coria (6-1 6-2). During the match Neumayer scored 56 points vs Coria’s 34. Lukas was exceptionally aggressive to blast 16 winners.
About the serving games, Neumayer scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he was quite consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Lukas Neumayer lost the serve once and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Neumayer put 60% of his first serves in, winning 59% (16/27) of the points behind his 1st serve and 67% (12/18) on the 2nd serve. Neumayer broke Coria 6 times after converting 67% of his break points (6/9).
The Austrian’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M25 Prague,M25 Jablonec nad Nisou and the Salzburg Challenger.
Neumayer has a composed 32-20 win-loss record in 2023, 30-16 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Kitzbuhel
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2021. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Medjedovic | Neumayer |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 23 | 15 |
| Pts | 80-72 | 56-34 |
| Total Points | 152 | 90 |
| Winners | 36 | 16 |
| %Winners | 45% | 29% |
Both Medjedovic and Neumayer played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Medjedovic and Neumayer have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Medjedovic played 8 games more than Neumayer. The Serbian scored 36 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, Neumayer fired 16 winners (29%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Medjedovic | Neumayer |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 19 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 19 | 1 |
| 1st in | 46/74 | 27/45 |
| %1st in | 62% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 36/46 | 16/27 |
| %1st pts | 78% | 59% |
| 2nd pts | 12/28 | 12/18 |
| %2nd pts | 43% | 67% |
Medjedovic bagged 19 aces . Neumayer fired 1 ace . Medjedovic won 78% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 43% of the points. On the other side, Neumayer won 59% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 67% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Medjedovic | Neumayer |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 6 |
| Converted | 3/7 | 6/9 |
| % Converted | 43% | 67% |
| Conceded | 8 | 4 |
| Saved | 6 | 3 |
| % Saved | 75% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
Medjedovic broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. Medjedovic lost his serve twice and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. Neumayer broke his opponent 6 times with a 67% conversion rate. The Austrian conceded his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| Medjedovic | |||
| Q1 Miedler |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 80-72 | 80-72 | |
| Total points | 152 | 152 | |
| Winners | 36 | 36 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 19 | 19 | |
| Double Faults | 9 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 46/74 | 46/74 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 36/46 | 36/46 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/28 | 12/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 43% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 6/8 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Neumayer | |||
| Q1 Coria |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 56-34 | 56-34 | |
| Total points | 90 | 90 | |
| Winners | 16 | 16 | |
| %Winners | 29% | 29% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 27/45 | 27/45 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 16/27 | 16/27 | |
| % 1st pts | 59% | 59% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/18 | 12/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 67% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/9 | 6/9 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWWLWWLW
LWWWWLWWWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas – Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas (4-1) – H2H and prediction
- Guido PellaPella – Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo BagnisBagnis – Ivan GakhovGakhov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dusan LajovicLajovic – Zhizhen ZhangZhang (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro – Dennis NovakNovak (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Laslo DjereDjere – Christopher O ConnellO Connell (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alexei PopyrinPopyrin – Arthur RinderknechRinderknech (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Daniel AltmaierAltmaier (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo – Guido AndreozziAndreozzi (2-0) – H2H and prediction
