Jeff Wolf and Dominik Koepfer will square off in the quarter of the Truist Atlanta Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 12:00 pm on STADIUM COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jeff Wolf who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jeff Wolf is the pick to win this match.
Jeff Wolf -> 1.6
Dominik Koepfer -> 2.34
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jeff Wolf vs. Dominik Koepfer
There is no head to head record between Jeff Wolf and Dominik Koepfer since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Jeff Wolf
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2-10 | 1-6 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-26 | 16-13 | 5-5 | 6-4 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 43-29 | 23-15 | 8-4 | 12-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 16-11 | 7-7 | 0-0 | 9-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 22-10 | 11-3 | 0-1 | 11-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 46, Jeff reached the quarter after defeating Jason Jung 6-2 6-1 and Maxime Cressy 7-67 6-3.
In the 2nd round, Wolf had a good straight sets win against Cressy (7-67 6-3). During the match, Wolf scored 65 points vs Cressy’s 62. Wolf was extremely aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Regarding the service games, Wolf scored 6 aces and he was exceptionally steady in conceding no double faults. Jeff Wolf was very efficient on serve to win 78% (36/46) of his 1st serve and 70% (16/23) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Jeff broke Cressy once after converting 25% of his break points (1/4).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The American hasn’t surrendered yet a set in this event to win 56% of the points he played.
Wolf has a solid record in the last 9 years having won 60% of his matches (153-102). 8-6 on hard in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Wolf has an overall75-53 win-loss record in the last 9 years on hard.
Jeff’s best result of the current year was getting to the semifinal in Dallas.
Jeff has a compiled 20-16 win-loss record in 2023, 8-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Atlanta
Dominik Koepfer
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 13-10 | 10-5 | 0-4 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-19 | 7-6 | 24-5 | 6-6 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 19-14 | 12-9 | 0-0 | 7-2 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 27-30 | 10-12 | 10-9 | 5-6 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-12 | 3-4 | 8-4 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 88, the German reached the quarter after beating John Isner 3-6 7-64 7-63 and Daniel Evans 2-6 7-63 6-4.
In the 2nd round against Evans, Koepfer recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 7-63 6-4). During the match Koepfer scored 99 points vs Evans’s 97. The German was exceptionally aggressive to blast 48 winners.
Talking about serving, Koepfer fired 10 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Dominik Koepfer lost the serve 4 times and he saved 10 break points. Furthermore, Koepfer put 71% of his first serves in, winning 72% (48/67) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (13/27) on the 2nd serve. Dominik broke Evans 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The German has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 51% of the points he played.
His best result of the year was winning the title the Mexico City Challenger where he defeated Thiago Agustin Tirante in the final 2-6 6-4 6-2 and the Turin Challenger where he beat Federico Gaio in the final 6-7(5) 6-2 6-0.
Koepfer has an aggregate 29-10 win-loss record in 2023, 2-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Atlanta
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Wolf | Koepfer |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 37 | 66 |
| Pts | 133-105 | 199-194 |
| Total Points | 238 | 393 |
| Winners | 57 | 101 |
| %Winners | 43% | 51% |
Both Wolf and Koepfer played 2 matches. At the moment, Dominik Koepfer conceded 2 sets while Jeff Wolf hasn’t conceded a set so far. Wolf has played 2 set(s) less than Koepfer (4 vs 6). Therefore, Wolf played 29 games less than Koepfer. Jeff scored 57 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, The German bagged 101 winners (51%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Wolf | Koepfer |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 13 | 14 |
| Avg per match | 6.5 | 7 |
| 1st in | 72/123 | 130/193 |
| %1st in | 59% | 67% |
| 1st pts | 57/72 | 101/130 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 33/51 | 37/63 |
| %2nd pts | 65% | 59% |
Wolf made 13 aces (6.5 per match). Koepfer bagged 14 aces (7 per match). Wolf won 79% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 65% of the points. On the other side, Koepfer won 78% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Wolf | Koepfer |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 3 |
| Converted | 5/11 | 3/6 |
| % Converted | 45% | 50% |
| Conceded | 1 | 21 |
| Saved | 1 | 16 |
| % Saved | 100% | 76% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 5 |
Wolf broke his opponents 5 times with a 45% conversion rate. Wolf pretty solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points. The German broke his opponents 3 times with a 50% conversion rate. Koepfer conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 76% of the break points that he conceded.
| Wolf | ||||
| R1 Jung |
R2 Cressy |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | 7-67 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 22 | 37 | |
| pts | 68-43 | 65-62 | 133-105 | |
| Total points | 111 | 127 | 238 | |
| Winners | 21 | 36 | 57 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 55% | 43% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 7 | 6 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 0 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 26/54 | 46/69 | 72/123 | |
| % 1st in | 48% | 67% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 21/26 | 36/46 | 57/72 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 78% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/28 | 16/23 | 33/51 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 70% | 65% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 1 | 5 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 1/4 | 5/11 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 25% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 0/0 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | – | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Koepfer | ||||
| R1 Isner |
R2 Evans |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 7-64 7-63 | 2-6 7-63 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 35 | 31 | 66 | |
| pts | 100-97 | 99-97 | 199-194 | |
| Total points | 197 | 196 | 393 | |
| Winners | 53 | 48 | 101 | |
| %Winners | 53% | 48% | 51% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 4 | 10 | 14 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 63/99 | 67/94 | 130/193 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 71% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 53/63 | 48/67 | 101/130 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 72% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 24/36 | 13/27 | 37/63 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 48% | 59% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 0 | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 0/1 | 3/5 | 3/6 | |
| Converted % | 0% | 60% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 14 | 21 | |
| Saved | 6/7 | 10/14 | 16 | |
| Saved % | 86% | 71% | 79% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 4 | 5 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLWLWLLL
LLLLLWWWLL Tennis Scores in Atlanta
- Nathaniel Lammons/Jack WithrowLammons/Jack Withrow – Yuki Bhambri/Saketh-Sai MyneniBhambri/Saketh-Sai Myneni (3-6 6-3 10-8) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Aleksandar VukicVukic (2-4) – H2H and prediction
- Taylor Harry FritzHarry Fritz – Kei NishikoriNishikori (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Dominik KoepferKoepfer – Jeff WolfWolf (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ugo HumbertHumbert – Alex De MinaurDe Minaur (1-3) – H2H and prediction
