Alexander Zgirovsky and Daniil Glinka will play each other in the qualifications of the Astana Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 10:00 am on CENTRE COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daniil Glinka who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Daniil Glinka is the pick to win this match.
Daniil Glinka -> 1.72
Alexander Zgirovsky -> 2.03
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Alexander Zgirovsky vs. Daniil Glinka
This will be the 2nd time that Alexander Zgirovsky and Daniil Glinka clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Glinka (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on hard.
The last time that they competed against each other, Glinka won 7-6(2) 7-6(4) in the qualifications in M15 St. Petersburg back in 2021.
Alexander Zgirovsky
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14-22 | 7-11 | 6-9 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 23-21 | 14-13 | 9-6 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-15 | 25-14 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 14-12 | 0-2 | 6-5 | 8-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 652, Alexander reached the qualifications after beating Sanjar Fayziev 4-6 6-1 6-2.
In the qualifications against Fayziev, The Belarussian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-1 6-2). During the match, Zgirovsky scored 98 points vs Fayziev’s 80. Zgirovsky was pretty aggressive to blast 45 winners.
Regarding the service games, Zgirovsky blasted 2 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Alexander Zgirovsky lost the serve twice and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Zgirovsky put 72% of his first serves in, winning 80% (45/56) of the points behind his 1st serve and 32% (7/22) on the 2nd serve. The Belarussian broke Fayziev 5 times after converting 33% of his break points (5/15).
Zgirovsky has a winning match record in the last 6 years having won 54% of his matches (74-64). 8-8 on hard in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Zgirovsky has an aggregate44-41 record in the last 6 years on hard.
Zgirovsky’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M25 Kursumlijska Banja.
Alexander has an aggregate 17-13 win-loss record in 2023, 8-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Astana Challenger
The Belarussian has never competed in this tournament before.
Daniil Glinka
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 37-29 | 19-14 | 0-1 | 14-12 | 0-0 | 4-2 |
| 2023 | 40-23 | 18-14 | 0-1 | 15-6 | 0-0 | 7-2 |
| 2022 | 23-29 | 17-22 | 0-0 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2021 | 29-31 | 9-14 | 12-11 | 8-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 13-11 | 10-8 | 2-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 728, Glinka reached the qualifications after beating Mykhailo Mossur 6-4 6-2.
In the qualifications, Daniil had a good straight sets win against Mossur (6-4 6-2). During the match Glinka scored 67 points vs Mossur’s 41. The Estonian was very aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Talking about serving, Glinka managed to score 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Daniil Glinka was pretty efficient on serve to win 96% (23/24) of his 1st serve and 76% (13/17) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Glinka broke Mossur 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
The Estonian’s best result of the season was getting to the semifinal in M15 Monastir.
Glinka has an overall 17-12 win-loss record in 2023, 11-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Zgirovsky | Glinka |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 25 | 18 |
| Pts | 98-80 | 67-41 |
| Total Points | 178 | 108 |
| Winners | 45 | 23 |
| %Winners | 46% | 34% |
Both Zgirovsky and Glinka played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Alexander Zgirovsky conceded 1 set while Daniil Glinka hasn’t dropped a set so far. Zgirovsky has played 1 set more than Glinka (3 vs 2). Therefore, Zgirovsky played 7 games more than Glinka. Zgirovsky scored 45 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, Glinka bagged 23 winners (34%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Zgirovsky | Glinka |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 5 |
| 1st in | 56/78 | 24/41 |
| %1st in | 72% | 59% |
| 1st pts | 45/56 | 23/24 |
| %1st pts | 80% | 96% |
| 2nd pts | 7/22 | 13/17 |
| %2nd pts | 32% | 76% |
Zgirovsky blasted 2 aces . Glinka blasted 5 aces . Zgirovsky won 80% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 32% of the points. On the other side, Glinka won 96% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 76% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Zgirovsky | Glinka |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 3 |
| Converted | 5/15 | 3/6 |
| % Converted | 33% | 50% |
| Conceded | 7 | 0 |
| Saved | 5 | 0 |
| % Saved | 71% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 |
Alexander broke his opponent 5 times with a 33% conversion rate. The Belarussian conceded his serve twice and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded. Glinka broke his opponent 3 times with a 50% conversion rate. Daniil was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Zgirovsky | |||
| Q1 Fayziev |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-1 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 25 | |
| pts | 98-80 | 98-80 | |
| Total points | 178 | 178 | |
| Winners | 45 | 45 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 56/78 | 56/78 | |
| % 1st in | 72% | 72% | |
| 1st pts | 45/56 | 45/56 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/22 | 7/22 | |
| % 2nd pts | 32% | 32% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/15 | 5/15 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 5/7 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 71% | 71% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Glinka | |||
| Q1 Mossur |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 67-41 | 67-41 | |
| Total points | 108 | 108 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 24/41 | 24/41 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 23/24 | 23/24 | |
| % 1st pts | 96% | 96% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/17 | 13/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 76% | 76% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/6 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLLLWWWW
LLLWWWLWWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin – Evgeny TyurnevTyurnev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dmitry PopkoPopko – Cengiz AksuAksu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sidharth RawatRawat – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Khumoun SultanovSultanov – Shuichi SekiguchiSekiguchi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gian Marco MoroniMarco Moroni – Aliaksandr LiaonenkaLiaonenka (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yusuke TakahashiTakahashi – Benjamin LockLock (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- S D Prajwal DevD Prajwal Dev – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ajeet RaiRai – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Niki Kaliyanda PoonachaKaliyanda Poonacha – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Digvijaypratap SinghSingh – Renta TokudaTokuda (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander ZgirovskyZgirovsky – Daniil GlinkaGlinka (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yanki ErelErel – Zura TkemaladzeTkemaladze (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Timur MaulenovMaulenov – Filip PeliwoPeliwo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
