Filip Misolic and Damir Dzumhur will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Nordea Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 11:00 am on CENTRE COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Filip Misolic who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Filip Misolic is the pick to win this match.
Filip Misolic -> 1.66
Damir Dzumhur -> 2.13
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Filip Misolic vs. Damir Dzumhur
There is no head to head record between Filip Misolic and Damir Dzumhur since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Filip Misolic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 53-28 | 8-7 | 36-11 | 6-9 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 16-22 | 1-4 | 15-16 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 39-28 | 6-9 | 25-13 | 8-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-18 | 5-4 | 31-12 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 46-16 | 0-1 | 44-13 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 139, Filip got to the qualifications after defeating Karl Friberg 0-6 6-1 6-4.
In the qualifications against Friberg, Misolic recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (0-6 6-1 6-4). During the match, Misolic scored 73 points vs Friberg’s 69. Misolic was pretty aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Regarding the service games, Misolic scored just 1 ace in the encounter and he was very solid in conceding no double faults. Filip Misolic lost the serve 5 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Misolic put 57% of his first serves in, winning 58% (21/36) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (12/27) on the 2nd serve. The Austrian broke Friberg 6 times after converting 50% of his break points (6/12).
Misolic has a solid match record in the last 5 years having won 65% of his matches (127-69). 15-7 on clay in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Misolic has an aggregate108-46 record in the last 5 years on clay.
His best result of the season was conquering the title the Roseto Degli Abruzzi Challenger where he beat Raphael Collignon in the final 4-6 7-5 7-6(6).
Filip has an aggregate 23-18 win-loss record in 2023, 15-7 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Bastad
Misolic has never competed in this tournament before.
Damir Dzumhur
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 38-34 | 9-11 | 21-16 | 8-4 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 47-30 | 11-13 | 28-7 | 6-7 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 41-34 | 15-5 | 18-18 | 8-9 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 34-28 | 5-5 | 19-12 | 10-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 32-32 | 6-6 | 17-17 | 6-6 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 169, the Bosnian got to the qualifications after beating Francesco Maestrelli 6-4 2-6 7-65.
In the qualifications, The Bosnian defeated Maestrelli (6-4 2-6 7-65).During the match Dzumhur scored less points (3) than Maestrelli. In fact, the world no. 139 won 104 points vs Maestrelli’s. That means that Dzumhur was more focused during the important points. Damir was extremely aggressive to blast 39 winners.
About the serving games, Dzumhur scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 3 double faults. Damir Dzumhur lost the serve 6 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Dzumhur put 69% of his first serves in, winning 57% (39/68) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (13/30) on the 2nd serve. The Bosnian broke Maestrelli 5 times after converting 42% of his break points (5/12).
Damir’s best result of the season was getting to the semifinal in the Vilnius Challenger.
Damir has an overall 19-20 win-loss record in 2023, 11-13 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Misolic | Dzumhur |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 23 | 31 |
| Pts | 73-69 | 104-107 |
| Total Points | 142 | 211 |
| Winners | 21 | 39 |
| %Winners | 29% | 38% |
Both Misolic and Dzumhur played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Filip Misolic conceded 1 set, while Damir Dzumhur conceded 1 set. Talking about their workload, Misolic and Dzumhur have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Misolic played 8 games less than Dzumhur. Misolic scored 21 winners (29% of the total points). On the other side, Damir managed to score 39 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Misolic | Dzumhur |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 1 |
| 1st in | 36/63 | 68/98 |
| %1st in | 57% | 69% |
| 1st pts | 21/36 | 39/68 |
| %1st pts | 58% | 57% |
| 2nd pts | 12/27 | 13/30 |
| %2nd pts | 44% | 43% |
Misolic fired 1 ace . Dzumhur also managed to score 1 ace . Misolic won 58% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 44% of the points. On the other side, Dzumhur won 57% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 43% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Misolic | Dzumhur |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 5 |
| Converted | 6/12 | 5/12 |
| % Converted | 50% | 42% |
| Conceded | 8 | 9 |
| Saved | 3 | 3 |
| % Saved | 38% | 33% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 6 |
The Austrian broke his opponent 6 times with a 50% conversion rate. Filip surrendered his serve 5 times and he saved 38% of the break points that he conceded. Damir broke his opponent 5 times with a 42% conversion rate. The Bosnian conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded.
| Misolic | |||
| Q1 Friberg |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 0-6 6-1 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 73-69 | 73-69 | |
| Total points | 142 | 142 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | |
| %Winners | 29% | 29% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 36/63 | 36/63 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 21/36 | 21/36 | |
| % 1st pts | 58% | 58% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/27 | 12/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 44% | 44% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/12 | 6/12 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 3/8 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 38% | 38% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
| Dzumhur | |||
| Q1 Maestrelli |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 2-6 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 104-107 | 104-107 | |
| Total points | 211 | 211 | |
| Winners | 39 | 39 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 68/98 | 68/98 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 39/68 | 39/68 | |
| % 1st pts | 57% | 57% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/30 | 13/30 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 43% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/12 | 5/12 | |
| Converted % | 42% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 3/9 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 6 | 6 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLWLWWLL
LWLWWLWWLW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander ZverevZverev – Alex MolcanMolcan (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elias YmerYmer – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri – Jozef KovalikKovalik (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Dragos Nicolae MadarasNicolae Madaras – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pavel KotovKotov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip MisolicMisolic – Damir DzumhurDzumhur (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian BaezBaez – Federico CoriaCoria (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo – Alexander ShevchenkoShevchenko (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Timofey SkatovSkatov – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (1-0) – H2H and prediction
