Matteo Gigante and Giovanni Oradini will face off in the 2nd round of the Milan Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 10:30 am on CENTER COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Matteo Gigante who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Matteo Gigante is the pick to win this match.
Matteo Gigante -> 1.27
Giovanni Oradini -> 3.5
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Matteo Gigante vs. Giovanni Oradini
This will be the 2nd time that Matteo Gigante and Giovanni Oradini fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Gigante (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they competed against each other, Gigante won 6-4 6-3 in the qualifications in the Verona Challenger back in 2022.
Matteo Gigante
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 38-22 | 24-8 | 11-10 | 2-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 32-29 | 10-5 | 19-18 | 1-5 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 38-20 | 9-1 | 27-15 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 21-15 | 2-2 | 16-7 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 4-9 | 1-1 | 2-5 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 256, Gigante reached the 2nd round after defeating Francesco Passaro 7-5 6-4.
In the 1st round, Matteo had a good straight sets win against Passaro (7-5 6-4). During the match, Gigante scored 77 points vs Passaro’s 69. Gigante was quite aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about the service games, Gigante bagged 5 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Matteo Gigante lost the serve 3 times and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Gigante put 44% of his first serves in, winning 73% (27/37) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (21/48) on the 2nd serve. Gigante broke Passaro 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
Gigante has a winning match record in the last 5 years having won 58% of his matches (89-65). 7-10 on clay in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Gigante has a compiled58-40 win-loss record in the last 5 years on clay.
His best result of the season was conquering the title the Tenerife 3 Challenger where he overcame Stefano Travaglia in the final 6-3 6-2.
Matteo has an aggregate 20-18 win-loss record in 2023, 7-10 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Milan Challenger
Giovanni Oradini
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 26-26 | 1-3 | 19-19 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 45-33 | 5-6 | 32-19 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
2022 | 62-30 | 27-11 | 25-11 | 10-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 25-10 | 13-5 | 12-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 5-2 | 0-0 | 5-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 437, Oradini got to the 2nd round after beating Carlos Taberner 6-72 6-3 6-3, Dmitry Popko 1-6 6-3 7-5 and Oleksii Krutykh 6-2 1-6 6-3.
In the 1st round, Oradini defeated Krutykh (6-2 1-6 6-3).During the match Oradini scored less points (3) than Krutykh. In fact, the world no. 256 won 74 points vs Krutykh’s. That means that Oradini was more focused during the important points. Oradini was exceptionally aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about serving, Oradini blasted 7 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Giovanni Oradini lost the serve 5 times and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Oradini put 57% of his first serves in, winning 69% (29/42) of the points behind his 1st serve and 34% (11/32) on the 2nd serve. Oradini broke Krutykh 6 times after converting 43% of his break points (6/14).
The Italian’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M25 Santa Margherita di Pula.
Oradini has a composed 21-22 win-loss record in 2023, 15-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Milan Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Gigante | Oradini |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 3 |
Tot Set | 2 | 9 |
Tot Games | 22 | 83 |
Pts | 77-69 | 272-267 |
Total Points | 146 | 539 |
Winners | 27 | 111 |
%Winners | 35% | 41% |
Gigante played 1 match while Oradini competed in 3 matches. Oradini started his run from the qualifications while Gigante had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Giovanni Oradini lost 3 sets while Matteo Gigante hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Gigante has played 7 set(s) less than Oradini (2 vs 9). Therefore, Gigante played 61 games less than Oradini. Gigante scored 27 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, The Italian bagged 111 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Gigante | Oradini |
---|---|---|
Aces | 5 | 14 |
Avg per match | 5 | 4.7 |
1st in | 37/85 | 154/270 |
%1st in | 44% | 57% |
1st pts | 27/37 | 111/154 |
%1st pts | 73% | 72% |
2nd pts | 21/48 | 46/116 |
%2nd pts | 44% | 40% |
Gigante fired 5 aces . Oradini struck 14 aces (4.7 per match). Gigante won 73% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 44% of the points. On the other side, Oradini won 72% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 40% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Gigante | Oradini |
---|---|---|
Won | 5 | 16 |
Converted | 5/7 | 16/36 |
% Converted | 71% | 44% |
Conceded | 11 | 23 |
Saved | 8 | 11 |
% Saved | 73% | 48% |
Times Broken | 3 | 12 |
Matteo broke his opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. Gigante dropped his serve 3 times and he saved 73% of the break points that he conceded. The Italian broke his opponents 16 times with a 44% conversion rate. The Italian conceded his serve 12 times and he saved 48% of the break points that he conceded.
Gigante | |||
R1 Passaro |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-5 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
pts | 77-69 | 77-69 | |
Total points | 146 | 146 | |
Winners | 27 | 27 | |
%Winners | 35% | 35% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 5 | 5 | |
Double Faults | 7 | 7 | |
1st in | 37/85 | 37/85 | |
% 1st in | 44% | 44% | |
1st pts | 27/37 | 27/37 | |
% 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
2nd pts | 21/48 | 21/48 | |
% 2nd pts | 44% | 44% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
Conceded | 11 | 11 | |
Saved | 8/11 | 8 | |
Saved % | 73% | 73% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
Oradini | |||||
Q1 Taberner |
Q3 Popko |
R1 Krutykh |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-72 6-3 6-3 | 1-6 6-3 7-5 | 6-2 1-6 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 | |
Tot Games | 31 | 28 | 24 | 83 | |
pts | 97-95 | 101-95 | 74-77 | 272-267 | |
Total points | 192 | 196 | 151 | 539 | |
Winners | 40 | 42 | 29 | 111 | |
%Winners | 41% | 42% | 39% | 41% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 4 | 3 | 7 | 14 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 4 | 3 | 7 | |
1st in | 57/100 | 55/96 | 42/74 | 154/270 | |
% 1st in | 57% | 57% | 57% | 57% | |
1st pts | 40/57 | 42/55 | 29/42 | 111/154 | |
% 1st pts | 70% | 76% | 69% | 72% | |
2nd pts | 20/43 | 15/41 | 11/32 | 46/116 | |
% 2nd pts | 47% | 37% | 34% | 40% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 6 | 4 | 6 | 16 | |
Converted | 6/11 | 4/11 | 6/14 | 16/36 | |
Converted % | 55% | 36% | 43% | 44% | |
Conceded | 9 | 8 | 6 | 23 | |
Saved | 6/9 | 4/8 | 1/6 | 11 | |
Saved % | 67% | 50% | 17% | 134% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 4 | 5 | 12 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Milan Challenger
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Federico GaioGaio (6-3 6-0) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta – Pablo CuevasCuevas (6-3 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Gauthier OnclinOnclin – Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi (6-4 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante – Federico IannacconeIannaccone (6-3 6-0) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante – Flavio CobolliCobolli (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta – Gauthier OnclinOnclin (0-0) – H2H and prediction