Coco Vandeweghe and Barbora Palicova will clash against each other in the qualifications of Wimbledon for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 1:00 pm on Court 7. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Coco Vandeweghe who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Coco Vandeweghe is the pick to win this match.
Coco Vandeweghe -> 1.57
Barbora Palicova -> 2.33
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Coco Vandeweghe vs. Barbora Palicova
There is no head to head record between Coco Vandeweghe and Barbora Palicova since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Coco Vandeweghe
8 - 11win/loss
420
9
LLLWWLWLLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 8-14 | 5-9 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 22-18 | 11-7 | 4-6 | 0-1 | 7-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 12-16 | 0-9 | 2-3 | 3-1 | 7-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-6 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 14-8 | 14-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 192, Vandeweghe reached the qualifications after defeating Su Jeong Jang 6-3 2-6 6-3.
In the qualifications, Vandeweghe defeated Jeong Jang (6-3 2-6 6-3). During the match, Vandeweghe scored 90 points vs Jeong Jang’s 88. Vandeweghe was extremely aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about the service games, Vandeweghe managed to score 3 aces and she committed only 7 double faults. Coco Vandeweghe lost the serve 3 times and she saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Vandeweghe put 49% of her first serves in, winning 71% (30/42) of the points behind her 1st serve and 50% (22/44) on the 2nd serve. Coco broke Jeong Jang 4 times after converting 33% of her break points (4/12).
Vandeweghe has favorable match record in the last 10 years having won 53% of her matches (178-155). 2-2 on grass in 2023. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this competition, Vandeweghe has a compiled 55-24 match record in the last years on grass.
The American has an aggregate 7-11 win-loss record in 2023, 2-2 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Wimbledon
Barbora Palicova
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 60-30 | 0-0 | 31-16 | 22-11 | 0-0 | 7-3 |
| 2023 | 20-30 | 4-9 | 5-11 | 10-8 | 1-1 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 61-25 | 4-4 | 34-13 | 23-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 21-14 | 12-8 | 6-4 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2020 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 215, the Czech reached the qualifications after beating Kathinka Von Deichmann 6-3 5-7 6-4.
In the qualifications, Barbora defeated Von Deichmann (6-3 5-7 6-4). During the match Palicova scored 126 points vs Von Deichmann’s 114. Palicova was very aggressive to blast 46 winners.
About the serving games, Palicova was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and she committed only 8 double faults. Barbora Palicova lost the serve 6 times and she saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Palicova put 68% of her first serves in, winning 63% (46/73) of the points behind her 1st serve and 38% (13/34) on the 2nd serve. The Czech broke Von Deichmann 7 times after converting 39% of her break points (7/18).
Barbora has an overall 11-14 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Wimbledon
Palicova has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Vandeweghe | Palicova |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 26 | 31 |
| Pts | 90-88 | 126-114 |
| Total Points | 178 | 240 |
| Winners | 30 | 46 |
| %Winners | 33% | 37% |
Both Vandeweghe and Palicova played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Coco Vandeweghe surrendered 1 set, while Barbora Palicova conceded 1 set. Talking about their workload, Vandeweghe and Palicova have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Vandeweghe played 5 games less than Palicova. Coco scored 30 winners (33% of the total points). On the other side, Barbora scored 46 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Vandeweghe | Palicova |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 0 |
| 1st in | 42/86 | 73/107 |
| %1st in | 49% | 68% |
| 1st pts | 30/42 | 46/73 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 63% |
| 2nd pts | 22/44 | 13/34 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 38% |
Vandeweghe blasted 3 aces . Palicova didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Vandeweghe won 71% points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Palicova won 63% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 38% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Vandeweghe | Palicova |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 7 |
| Converted | 4/12 | 7/18 |
| % Converted | 33% | 39% |
| Conceded | 6 | 13 |
| Saved | 3 | 7 |
| % Saved | 50% | 54% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 6 |
Coco broke her opponent 4 times with a 33% conversion rate. Vandeweghe lost her serve 3 times and she saved 50% of the break points that she conceded. The Czech broke her opponent 7 times with a 39% conversion rate. Palicova conceded her serve 6 times and she saved 54% of the break points that she conceded.
| Vandeweghe | |||
| Q1 Jeong Jang |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 2-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
| pts | 90-88 | 90-88 | |
| Total points | 178 | 178 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 42/86 | 42/86 | |
| % 1st in | 49% | 49% | |
| 1st pts | 30/42 | 30/42 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/44 | 22/44 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/12 | 4/12 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 3/6 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Palicova | |||
| Q1 Von Deichmann |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 5-7 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 126-114 | 126-114 | |
| Total points | 240 | 240 | |
| Winners | 46 | 46 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 8 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 73/107 | 73/107 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 46/73 | 46/73 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 63% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/34 | 13/34 | |
| % 2nd pts | 38% | 38% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/18 | 7/18 | |
| Converted % | 39% | 39% | |
| Conceded | 13 | 13 | |
| Saved | 7/13 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 54% | 54% | |
| Times Broken | 6 | 6 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWWLWWW Tennis Scores – Wimbledon
- Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna – Agustin Suarez GonzalezSuarez Gonzalez (6-1 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Facundo JuarezJuarez – Juan Bautista OteguiBautista Otegui (6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Juan Carlos SaezCarlos Saez – Nicolas Alberto ArrecheAlberto Arreche (6-1 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Gabriel Alejandro HidalgoAlejandro Hidalgo – Lorenzo GagliardoGagliardo (7-5 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alan KohenKohen – Francisco ComesanaComesana (6-2 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Franco Emanuel EgeaEmanuel Egea – Luis Diego Chavez VillalpandoDiego Chavez Villalpando (6-4 6-76 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Fernando YamacitaYamacita – Ignacio CarouCarou (6-4 7-64) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Nicolas BianchiBianchi – Esteban BrunaBruna (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Leonardo AboianAboian – Simon NavarroNavarro (6-3 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Elina AvanesyanAvanesyan – Storm SandersSanders (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Reka-Luca JaniJani – Nao HibinoHibino (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Arantxa RusRus – Carol ZhaoZhao (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Clara TausonTauson – Rebecca SramkovaSramkova (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jaimee FourlisFourlis – Viktoria KuzmovaKuzmova (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Elizabeth MandlikMandlik – Natalija KosticKostic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Eva LysLys – Marina Bassols RiberaBassols Ribera (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jana CepelovaCepelova – Laura SiegemundSiegemund (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Elena Gabriela RuseGabriela Ruse – Yanina WickmayerWickmayer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Carole MonnetMonnet – Tamara KorpatschKorpatsch (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Clara BurelBurel – Jessica Bouzas ManeiroBouzas Maneiro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ann LiLi – Olivia GadeckiGadecki (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Taylor TownsendTownsend – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Moyuka UchijimaUchijima – Sofia KeninKenin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oceane DodinDodin – Despina PapamichailPapamichail (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Naiktha BainsBains – Viktorija GolubicGolubic (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yue YuanYuan – Yuriko MiyazakiMiyazaki (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katherine SebovSebov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sinja KrausKraus – Raluca Georgiana SerbanGeorgiana Serban (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kaja JuvanJuvan – Tamara ZidansekZidansek (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Greetje MinnenMinnen – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Simona WaltertWaltert – Julia RieraRiera (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ana KonjuhKonjuh – Emiliana ArangoArango (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dayana YastremskaYastremska – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kayla DayDay – Su-Wei HsiehHsieh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Priscilla HonHon – Lucrezia StefaniniStefanini (1-0) – H2H and prediction
