Sho Shimabukuro and Toby Samuel will play each other in the qualifications of Wimbledon for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 11:00 am on Court 13. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Sho Shimabukuro who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Sho Shimabukuro is the pick to win this match.
Sho Shimabukuro -> 1.533
Toby Samuel -> 2.42
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Sho Shimabukuro vs. Toby Samuel
There is no head to head record between Sho Shimabukuro and Toby Samuel since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Sho Shimabukuro
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 29-27 | 20-16 | 1-3 | 3-5 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
2023 | 43-26 | 19-17 | 7-1 | 9-4 | 8-4 | 0-0 |
2022 | 42-25 | 38-20 | 0-2 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 31-20 | 28-18 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 4-5 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 162 (career-high), Sho reached the qualifications after defeating Facundo Diaz Acosta 6-75 6-3 6-4.
In the qualifications against Diaz Acosta, The Japanese recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-75 6-3 6-4). During the match, Shimabukuro scored 96 points vs Diaz Acosta’s 77. The Japanese was pretty aggressive to blast 42 winners.
Regarding the service games, Shimabukuro managed to score 6 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Sho Shimabukuro was extremely effective on serve to win 88% (42/48) of his 1st serve and 76% (25/33) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Shimabukuro broke Diaz Acosta twice after converting 22% of his break points (2/9).
Shimabukuro has a solid match record in the last 8 years having won 65% of his matches (194-106). 6-3 on grass in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Shimabukuro has an aggregate6-3 win-loss record in the last 8 years on grass.
His best result of the current year was winning the title the Nonthaburi 3 Challenger where he beat Arthur Cazaux in the final 6-2 7-5 and the Tunis Challenger where he overcame Geoffrey Blancaneaux in the final 6-4 6-4.
Shimabukuro has an aggregate 26-14 win-loss record in 2023, 6-3 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Wimbledon
Shimabukuro has never competed in this tournament before.
Toby Samuel
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 1-1 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 24-14 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 8-6 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
2022 | 20-5 | 7-1 | 0-0 | 5-1 | 8-3 | 0-0 |
2021 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 543, Samuel got to the qualifications after beating Antoine Bellier 6-4 7-65.
In the qualifications, The Brit had a good straight sets win against Bellier (6-4 7-65). During the match Samuel scored 64 points vs Bellier’s 61. Samuel was extremely aggressive to blast 43 winners.
Talking about serving, Samuel bagged 6 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Toby Samuel conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 1 break points. Furthermore, Samuel put 73% of his first serves in, winning 93% (43/46) of the points behind his 1st serve and 41% (7/17) on the 2nd serve. Samuel broke Bellier once after converting 33% of his break points (1/3).
The Brit has a compiled 2-4 win-loss record in 2023, 1-3 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Shimabukuro | Samuel |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
Tot Games | 32 | 23 |
Pts | 96-77 | 64-61 |
Total Points | 173 | 125 |
Winners | 42 | 43 |
%Winners | 44% | 67% |
Both Shimabukuro and Samuel played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Sho Shimabukuro lost 1 set while Toby Samuel hasn’t conceded a set so far. Shimabukuro has played 1 set more than Samuel (3 vs 2). Therefore, Shimabukuro played 9 games more than Samuel. Sho scored 42 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, Samuel managed to score 43 winners (67%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Shimabukuro | Samuel |
---|---|---|
Aces | 6 | 6 |
Avg per match | 6 | 6 |
1st in | 48/81 | 46/63 |
%1st in | 59% | 73% |
1st pts | 42/48 | 43/46 |
%1st pts | 88% | 93% |
2nd pts | 25/33 | 7/17 |
%2nd pts | 76% | 41% |
Shimabukuro blasted 6 aces . Samuel bagged 6 aces . Shimabukuro won 88% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 76% of the points. On the other side, Samuel won 93% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 41% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Shimabukuro | Samuel |
---|---|---|
Won | 2 | 1 |
Converted | 2/9 | 1/3 |
% Converted | 22% | 33% |
Conceded | 0 | 1 |
Saved | 0 | 1 |
% Saved | 0% | 100% |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Shimabukuro broke his opponent twice with a 22% conversion rate. Sho pretty solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points. The Brit broke his opponent once with a 33% conversion rate. Samuel was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points.
Shimabukuro | |||
Q1 Diaz |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-75 6-3 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 32 | 32 | |
pts | 96-77 | 96-77 | |
Total points | 173 | 173 | |
Winners | 42 | 42 | |
%Winners | 44% | 44% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 6 | 6 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 48/81 | 48/81 | |
% 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
1st pts | 42/48 | 42/48 | |
% 1st pts | 88% | 88% | |
2nd pts | 25/33 | 25/33 | |
% 2nd pts | 76% | 76% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 2 | 2 | |
Converted | 2/9 | 2/9 | |
Converted % | 22% | 22% | |
Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
Saved % | – | 0% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Samuel | |||
Q1 Bellier |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 7-65 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
pts | 64-61 | 64-61 | |
Total points | 125 | 125 | |
Winners | 43 | 43 | |
%Winners | 67% | 67% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 6 | 6 | |
Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
1st in | 46/63 | 46/63 | |
% 1st in | 73% | 73% | |
1st pts | 43/46 | 43/46 | |
% 1st pts | 93% | 93% | |
2nd pts | 7/17 | 7/17 | |
% 2nd pts | 41% | 41% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 1 | 1 | |
Converted | 1/3 | 1/3 | |
Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores – Wimbledon
- Dragos Nicolae MadarasNicolae Madaras – Dane SweenySweeny (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Pablo CuevasCuevas – Egor GerasimovGerasimov (6-4 6-78 7-62) – See score progression
- Matteo ArnaldiArnaldi – Juncheng ShangShang (3-6 7-60 7-5) – See score progression
- Tomas Barrios VeraBarrios Vera – Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Aziz DougazDougaz (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Enzo CouacaudCouacaud – Raul BrancaccioBrancaccio (6-4 7-63) – See score progression
- Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri – Arthur CazauxCazaux (7-64 6-4) – See score progression
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Stuart ParkerParker (4-6 6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Zizou BergsBergs – Brandon HoltHolt (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Hamad MedjedovicMedjedovic – Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero (6-0 6-1) – See score progression
- Hugo GastonGaston – Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Leandro RiediRiedi – Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (6-0 5-7 6-2) – See score progression
- Harold MayotMayot – Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux (6-0 6-1) – See score progression
- Lukas KleinKlein – Vit KoprivaKopriva (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Johannus MondayMonday – Mili PoljicakPoljicak (3-6 7-64 6-3) – See score progression
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – Oleksii KrutykhKrutykh (6-1 1-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Toby SamuelSamuel – Antoine BellierBellier (6-4 7-65) – See score progression
- Oscar OtteOtte – Benoit PairePaire (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Michael MmohMmoh – Adrian AndreevAndreev (6-4 3-6 7-64) – See score progression
- Zsombor PirosPiros – Joris De LooreDe Loore (7-67 1-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Hyeon ChungChung – Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov (6-2 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Gijs BrouwerBrouwer – Luca PowPow (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Billy HarrisHarris – Alexander RitschardRitschard (5-7 7-65 6-2) – See score progression
- Lucas PouillePouille – Zdenek KolarKolar (4-6 6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Felipe Meligeni AlvesMeligeni Alves – Vasek PospisilPospisil (6-2 7-62) – See score progression
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – Andrea CollariniCollarini (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Matteo GiganteGigante – Harry WendelkenWendelken (6-3 7-66) – See score progression
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki – Hugo GrenierGrenier (6-2 7-63) – See score progression
- Ricardas BerankisBerankis – Mariano NavoneNavone (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – Cem IlkelIlkel (6-3 4-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Emilio GomezGomez – Riccardo BonadioBonadio (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Mattia BellucciBellucci – Ivan GakhovGakhov (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Denis KudlaKudla – Francesco PassaroPassaro (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Laurent LokoliLokoli – Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel (6-1 7-67) – See score progression
- Kaichi UchidaUchida – Franco AgamenoneAgamenone (4-6 7-62 6-2) – See score progression
- Dominic StrickerStricker – Steve JohnsonJohnson (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Andrea VavassoriVavassori (7-63 7-5) – See score progression
- Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva – Damir DzumhurDzumhur (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Pablo Llamas RuizLlamas Ruiz – Maximilian NeuchristNeuchrist (6-4 7-62) – See score progression
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Timofey SkatovSkatov (6-73 6-4 7-611) – See score progression
- Zachary SvajdaSvajda – Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri (6-1 5-7 6-3) – See score progression
- Federico GaioGaio – Daniel CoxCox (2-6 7-62 7-5) – See score progression
- Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert – Alejandro TabiloTabilo (6-77 6-4 7-611) – See score progression
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – Alex BoltBolt (7-62 7-69) – See score progression
- Luca NardiNardi – Jozef KovalikKovalik (6-2 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Norbert GombosGombos – Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran (6-2 2-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta (6-75 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng (6-3 3-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Flavio CobolliCobolli (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Luciano DarderiDarderi (5-7 6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild – Jelle SelsSels (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Radu AlbotAlbot – Nick HardtHardt (6-2 7-62) – See score progression
- Taro DanielDaniel – Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Gauthier OnclinOnclin – Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante (6-2 6-0) – See score progression
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Seong Chan HongChan Hong (7-64 7-67) – See score progression
- Otto VirtanenVirtanen – Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Raphael CollignonCollignon – Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete (7-65 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Tomas MachacMachac – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (7-67 6-4) – See score progression
- Dennis NovakNovak – Filip MisolicMisolic (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Elias YmerYmer – Antoine EscoffierEscoffier (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Charles BroomBroom – Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi (6-4 6-74 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Pablo CuevasCuevas – Felipe Meligeni Rodrigues AlvesMeligeni Rodrigues Alves (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Radu AlbotAlbot – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Harold MayotMayot (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert – Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lucas PouillePouille – Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva – Emilio GomezGomez (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Taro DanielDaniel – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Laurent LokoliLokoli – Norbert GombosGombos (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Gauthier OnclinOnclin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hyeon ChungChung – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael MmohMmoh – Dragos Nicolae MadarasNicolae Madaras (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Billy HarrisHarris – Hugo GastonGaston (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Denis KudlaKudla (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Lukas KleinKlein – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zizou BergsBergs – Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – Jesper De JongDe Jong (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Charles BroomBroom – Dennis NovakNovak (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Gijs BrouwerBrouwer (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zsombor PirosPiros – Pablo Llamas RuizLlamas Ruiz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Otto VirtanenVirtanen (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – Elias YmerYmer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas MachacMachac – Kaichi UchidaUchida (0-0) – H2H and prediction