Mikael Ymer and Liam Broady will face off in the 2nd round of the Rothesay International for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 12:30 pm on COURT 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mikael Ymer who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Mikael Ymer is the pick to win this match.
Mikael Ymer -> 1.43
Liam Broady -> 2.83
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Mikael Ymer vs. Liam Broady
This will be the 2nd time that Mikael Ymer and Liam Broady clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Ymer (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on grass.
The last time that they locked horns, Ymer won 6-3 4-6 6-2 in the 2nd round in the Vancouver Challenger back in 2022.
Mikael Ymer
21 - 16win/loss
136
50
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2023 | 24-18 | 6-7 | 3-3 | 11-4 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
2022 | 31-25 | 9-6 | 3-8 | 17-9 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
2021 | 27-24 | 9-5 | 10-7 | 5-9 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
2020 | 12-11 | 6-6 | 2-3 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2019 | 54-20 | 13-4 | 20-7 | 17-6 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 61, the Swede reached the 2nd round after defeating Botic Van De Zandschulp 3-6 6-4 6-2.
In the 1st round against Van De Zandschulp, The Swede recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-4 6-2). During the match, Ymer scored 95 points vs Van De Zandschulp’s 90. The Swede was extremely aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Talking about the service games, Ymer scored just 1 ace in the encounter and he was not very solid on his 2nd serve to score 10 double faults. Mikael Ymer lost the serve 3 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Ymer put 57% of his first serves in, winning 76% (41/54) of the points behind his 1st serve and 40% (16/40) on the 2nd serve. The Swede broke Van De Zandschulp 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Ymer has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 62% of his matches (275-165). 1-2 on grass in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Ymer has a composed 10-10 match record in the last years on grass.
Ymer’s best result of the year was getting to the final in the Neuve Challenger.
The Swede has a compiled 21-16 win-loss record in 2023, 1-2 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Eastbourne
Liam Broady
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 5-5 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 45-28 | 23-9 | 2-4 | 15-9 | 5-6 | 0-0 |
2022 | 36-25 | 16-9 | 2-5 | 10-5 | 8-6 | 0-0 |
2021 | 45-26 | 19-10 | 7-5 | 16-7 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
2020 | 19-14 | 2-4 | 9-4 | 8-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 147, Broady got to the 2nd round after beating Jan Choinski 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round, The Brit had a good straight sets win against Choinski (6-3 6-4). During the match Broady scored 69 points vs Choinski’s 57. Broady was extremely aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about serving, Broady recorded 8 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Liam Broady lost the serve once and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Broady put 58% of his first serves in, winning 84% (31/37) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (12/27) on the 2nd serve. The Brit broke Choinski 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
His best result of the season was winning the title the Vilnius Challenger where he overcame Zdenek Kolar in the final 6-4 6-4.
Liam has an aggregate 23-13 win-loss record in 2023, 2-3 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Eastbourne
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2021. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Ymer | Broady |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
Tot Games | 27 | 19 |
Pts | 95-90 | 69-57 |
Total Points | 185 | 126 |
Winners | 41 | 31 |
%Winners | 43% | 45% |
Both Ymer and Broady played 1 match. At the moment, Mikael Ymer conceded 1 set while Liam Broady hasn’t lost a set so far. Ymer has played 1 set more than Broady (3 vs 2). Therefore, Ymer played 8 games more than Broady. Mikael scored 41 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, Broady blasted 31 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Ymer | Broady |
---|---|---|
Aces | 1 | 8 |
Avg per match | 1 | 8 |
1st in | 54/94 | 37/64 |
%1st in | 57% | 58% |
1st pts | 41/54 | 31/37 |
%1st pts | 76% | 84% |
2nd pts | 16/40 | 12/27 |
%2nd pts | 40% | 44% |
Ymer bagged 1 ace . Broady also scored 8 aces . Ymer won 76% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 40% of the points. On the other side, Broady won 84% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 44% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Ymer | Broady |
---|---|---|
Won | 4 | 3 |
Converted | 4/9 | 3/7 |
% Converted | 44% | 43% |
Conceded | 8 | 2 |
Saved | 5 | 1 |
% Saved | 63% | 50% |
Times Broken | 3 | 1 |
The Swede broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Ymer lost his serve 3 times and he saved 63% of the break points that he conceded. The Brit broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. Broady conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
Ymer | |||
R1 Van De Zandschulp |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 3-6 6-4 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
pts | 95-90 | 95-90 | |
Total points | 185 | 185 | |
Winners | 41 | 41 | |
%Winners | 43% | 43% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 1 | 1 | |
Double Faults | 10 | 10 | |
1st in | 54/94 | 54/94 | |
% 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
1st pts | 41/54 | 41/54 | |
% 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
2nd pts | 16/40 | 16/40 | |
% 2nd pts | 40% | 40% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
Saved | 5/8 | 5 | |
Saved % | 63% | 63% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
Broady | |||
R1 Choinski |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
pts | 69-57 | 69-57 | |
Total points | 126 | 126 | |
Winners | 31 | 31 | |
%Winners | 45% | 45% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 8 | 8 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
1st in | 37/64 | 37/64 | |
% 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
1st pts | 31/37 | 31/37 | |
% 1st pts | 84% | 84% | |
2nd pts | 12/27 | 12/27 | |
% 2nd pts | 44% | 44% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Eastbourne
- Mikael YmerYmer – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (3-6 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Liam BroadyBroady – Jan ChoinskiChoinski (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Maxime CressyCressy – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Marco CecchinatoCecchinato (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Sebastian BaezBaez – Nuno BorgesBorges (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Brandon NakashimaNakashima (6-75 7-63 7-65) – See score progression
- Nikola Mektic/Mate PavicMektic/Mate Pavic – Jamie Murray/Michael VenusMurray/Michael Venus (7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori (3-6 7-66 7-64) – See score progression
- Jeff WolfWolf – Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Ryan PenistonPeniston (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic – Yibing WuWu (7-64 7-65) – See score progression
- Luca Van AsscheVan Assche – George LoffhagenLoffhagen (2-6 7-65 7-64) – See score progression
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Marco CecchinatoCecchinato (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Liam BroadyBroady – Jan ChoinskiChoinski (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Mikael YmerYmer – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (3-6 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Maxime CressyCressy – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Zhizhen ZhangZhang – Lorenzo SonegoSonego (7-6(4) 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Liam BroadyBroady – Mikael YmerYmer (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Nicolas JarryJarry (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zhizhen ZhangZhang – Lorenzo SonegoSonego (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Taylor Harry FritzHarry Fritz – Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald (4-1) – H2H and prediction
- Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic – Aleksandar VukicVukic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jeff WolfWolf – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francisco CerundoloCerundolo – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian BaezBaez – Tommy PaulPaul (0-0) – H2H and prediction