Jeff Wolf and Luca Van Assche will play each other in the 2nd round of the Rothesay International for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 4:00 pm on COURT 5. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jeff Wolf who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jeff Wolf is the pick to win this match.
Jeff Wolf -> 1.38
Luca Van Assche -> 3.04
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jeff Wolf vs. Luca Van Assche
There is no head to head record between Jeff Wolf and Luca Van Assche since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Jeff Wolf
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 14-23 | 8-13 | 6-9 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 31-26 | 16-13 | 5-5 | 6-4 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
2022 | 43-29 | 23-15 | 8-4 | 12-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 16-11 | 7-7 | 0-0 | 9-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 22-10 | 11-3 | 0-1 | 11-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 46, Wolf reached the 2nd round after defeating Tomas Martin Etcheverry 6-2 6-4.
In the 1st round, Jeff had a good straight sets win against Etcheverry (6-2 6-4). During the match, Wolf scored 66 points vs Etcheverry’s 49. The American was exceptionally aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about the service games, Wolf fired 9 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Jeff Wolf was quite efficient on serve to win 89% (25/28) of his 1st serve and 63% (12/19) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The American broke Etcheverry 3 times after converting 38% of his break points (3/8).
Wolf has a solid record in the last 9 years having won 60% of his matches (149-100). 2-2 on grass in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Wolf has an aggregate2-2 record in the last 9 years on grass.
The American’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in Dallas.
The American has an aggregate 16-14 win-loss record in 2023, 2-2 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Eastbourne
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
Luca Van Assche
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 25-29 | 14-14 | 8-10 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
2023 | 34-30 | 1-7 | 15-11 | 15-9 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
2022 | 55-31 | 0-1 | 40-20 | 15-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 26-22 | 3-2 | 8-7 | 15-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 7-4 | 0-0 | 6-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 79, Luca reached the 2nd round after beating Mukund Sasikumar 6-4 6-0, Borna Gojo 6-4 7-66 and George Loffhagen 2-6 7-65 7-64.
In the 1st round against Loffhagen, Van recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 7-65 7-64).During the match Van scored less points (4) than Loffhagen. In fact, the world no. 46 won 113 points vs Loffhagen’s. That means that Van was more focused during the important points. The French player was extremely aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Talking about serving, Van scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 4 double faults. Luca Van Assche lost the serve 8 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Van put 58% of his first serves in, winning 55% (35/64) of the points behind his 1st serve and 51% (24/47) on the 2nd serve. The French player broke Loffhagen 6 times after converting 55% of his break points (6/11).
His best result of the year was winning the title the Pau Challenger where he beat Ugo Humbert in the final 7-6(5) 4-6 7-6(6) and the Sanremo Challenger where he beat Juan Pablo Varillas in the final 6-1 6-3.
Van has an overall 23-16 win-loss record in 2023, 3-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Wolf | Van |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 3 |
Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
Tot Games | 18 | 73 |
Pts | 66-49 | 248-223 |
Total Points | 115 | 471 |
Winners | 25 | 85 |
%Winners | 38% | 34% |
Wolf played 1 match while Van competed in 3 matches. Van started his run from the qualifications while Wolf had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Luca Van Assche dropped 1 set while Jeff Wolf hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Wolf has played 5 set(s) less than Van (2 vs 7). Therefore, Wolf played 55 games less than Van. The American scored 25 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Van scored 85 winners (34%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Wolf | Van |
---|---|---|
Aces | 9 | 12 |
Avg per match | 9 | 4 |
1st in | 28/47 | 123/226 |
%1st in | 60% | 54% |
1st pts | 25/28 | 85/123 |
%1st pts | 89% | 69% |
2nd pts | 12/19 | 54/103 |
%2nd pts | 63% | 52% |
Wolf blasted 9 aces . Van recorded 12 aces (4 per match). Wolf won 89% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 63% of the points. On the other side, Van won 69% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Wolf | Van |
---|---|---|
Won | 3 | 13 |
Converted | 3/8 | 13/27 |
% Converted | 38% | 48% |
Conceded | 2 | 16 |
Saved | 2 | 6 |
% Saved | 100% | 38% |
Times Broken | 0 | 10 |
Jeff broke his opponent 3 times with a 38% conversion rate. Wolf extremely effective on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 2 break points. Van broke his opponents 13 times with a 48% conversion rate. Van conceded his serve 10 times and he saved 38% of the break points that he conceded.
Wolf | |||
R1 Etcheverry |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
pts | 66-49 | 66-49 | |
Total points | 115 | 115 | |
Winners | 25 | 25 | |
%Winners | 38% | 38% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 9 | 9 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 28/47 | 28/47 | |
% 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
1st pts | 25/28 | 25/28 | |
% 1st pts | 89% | 89% | |
2nd pts | 12/19 | 12/19 | |
% 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/8 | 3/8 | |
Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Van | |||||
Q1 Kumar Mukund |
Q3 Gojo |
R1 Loffhagen |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-0 | 6-4 7-66 | 2-6 7-65 7-64 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
Tot Games | 16 | 23 | 34 | 73 | |
pts | 61-39 | 74-67 | 113-117 | 248-223 | |
Total points | 100 | 141 | 230 | 471 | |
Winners | 25 | 25 | 35 | 85 | |
%Winners | 41% | 34% | 31% | 34% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 7 | 4 | 1 | 12 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 3 | 4 | 11 | |
1st in | 28/47 | 31/68 | 64/111 | 123/226 | |
% 1st in | 60% | 46% | 58% | 54% | |
1st pts | 25/28 | 25/31 | 35/64 | 85/123 | |
% 1st pts | 89% | 81% | 55% | 69% | |
2nd pts | 6/19 | 24/37 | 24/47 | 54/103 | |
% 2nd pts | 32% | 65% | 51% | 52% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 5 | 2 | 6 | 13 | |
Converted | 5/11 | 2/5 | 6/11 | 13/27 | |
Converted % | 45% | 40% | 55% | 48% | |
Conceded | 1 | 1 | 14 | 16 | |
Saved | 0/1 | 0/1 | 6/14 | 6 | |
Saved % | 0% | 0% | 43% | 43% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 8 | 10 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Eastbourne
- Mikael YmerYmer – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (3-6 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Maxime CressyCressy – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Liam BroadyBroady – Jan ChoinskiChoinski (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Marco CecchinatoCecchinato (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Luca Van AsscheVan Assche – George LoffhagenLoffhagen (2-6 7-65 7-64) – See score progression
- Jeff WolfWolf – Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Brandon NakashimaNakashima (6-75 7-63 7-65) – See score progression
- Nikola Mektic/Mate PavicMektic/Mate Pavic – Jamie Murray/Michael VenusMurray/Michael Venus (7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Ryan PenistonPeniston (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori (3-6 7-66 7-64) – See score progression
- Sebastian BaezBaez – Nuno BorgesBorges (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic – Yibing WuWu (7-64 7-65) – See score progression
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Marco CecchinatoCecchinato (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Liam BroadyBroady – Jan ChoinskiChoinski (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Mikael YmerYmer – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (3-6 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Maxime CressyCressy – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Liam BroadyBroady – Mikael YmerYmer (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Nicolas JarryJarry (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zhizhen ZhangZhang – Lorenzo SonegoSonego (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Taylor Harry FritzHarry Fritz – Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald (4-1) – H2H and prediction
- Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic – Aleksandar VukicVukic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jeff WolfWolf – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francisco CerundoloCerundolo – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian BaezBaez – Tommy PaulPaul (0-0) – H2H and prediction