Pedro Cachin and Nerman Fatic will clash against each other in the quarter of the Perugia Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 3:30 pm on Center Court. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Pedro Cachin who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Pedro Cachin is the pick to win this match.
Pedro Cachin -> 1.28
Nerman Fatic -> 3.5
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Pedro Cachin vs. Nerman Fatic
This will be the 3rd time that Pedro Cachin and Nerman Fatic fight against each other. The head to head is 1-1 for Cachin and Fatic (see full H2H stats),but they are 1-1 on clay.
The last time that they played each other, Fatic won 6-4 7-6(5) in the 1st round in the Perugia Challenger back in 2021.
Pedro Cachin
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 11-26 | 0-6 | 11-19 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 32-32 | 4-8 | 28-19 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 49-22 | 5-4 | 41-13 | 2-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 47-25 | 0-0 | 47-24 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 25-11 | 2-1 | 23-9 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 71, Pedro got to the quarter after beating Gianmarco Ferrari 6-4 6-4 and Andrea Collarini 6-1 3-1 ret..
In the 2nd round against Collarini, the Argentine had a free pass after Collarini retired on a 6-1 3-1 . scoreline.
Cachin has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 62% of his matches (377-233). 18-13 on clay in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Cachin has a composed 356-198 match record in the last years on clay.
Pedro’s best result of the season was getting to the final in the Madrid Challenger.
Cachin has an overall 19-19 win-loss record in 2023, 18-13 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Perugia Challenger
Nerman Fatic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14-24 | 3-5 | 10-18 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-28 | 0-1 | 35-25 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 34-27 | 0-1 | 31-19 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 37-26 | 1-1 | 30-22 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 11-3 | 0-0 | 9-1 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 271, the Bosnian reached the quarter after defeating Pietro Genovese 6-2 6-1, Matteo Martineau 6-2 6-4, Giulio Zeppieri 7-64 2-6 6-1 and Matteo Gigante 4-6 7-64 6-3.
In the 2nd round against Gigante, The Bosnian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-64 6-3). During the match Fatic scored 102 points vs Gigante’s 87. The Bosnian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 43 winners.
About the serving games, Fatic blasted 6 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Nerman Fatic was pretty efficient on serve to win 74% (43/58) of his 1st serve and 64% (21/33) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve 4 times. Nerman broke Gigante 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Fatic started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 55% of the points he played.
Nerman has an overall 13-10 win-loss record in 2023, 13-10 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Perugia Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the quarter in 2021. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Cachin | Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 10 |
| Tot Games | 31 | 93 |
| Pts | 108-70 | 298-243 |
| Total Points | 178 | 541 |
| Winners | 49 | 137 |
| %Winners | 45% | 46% |
Cachin played 2 matches while Fatic competed in 4 matches. Fatic started his run from the qualifications while Cachin had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Nerman Fatic surrendered 2 sets while Pedro Cachin hasn’t conceded a set so far. Cachin has played 5 set(s) less than Fatic (5 vs 10). Therefore, Cachin played 62 games less than Fatic. The Argentine scored 49 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, Nerman made 137 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Cachin | Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 25 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 6.3 |
| 1st in | 59/92 | 178/265 |
| %1st in | 64% | 67% |
| 1st pts | 49/59 | 137/178 |
| %1st pts | 83% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 21/33 | 53/87 |
| %2nd pts | 64% | 61% |
Cachin managed to score 8 aces (4 per match). Fatic struck 25 aces (6.3 per match). Cachin won 83% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 64% of the points. On the other side, Fatic won 77% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Cachin | Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 14 |
| Converted | 5/6 | 14/28 |
| % Converted | 83% | 50% |
| Conceded | 4 | 13 |
| Saved | 4 | 7 |
| % Saved | 100% | 54% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 6 |
Cachin broke his opponents 5 times with a 83% conversion rate. Cachin very solid his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 4 break points. Nerman broke his opponents 14 times with a 50% conversion rate. Nerman conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 54% of the break points that he conceded.
| Cachin | ||||
| R1 Ferrari |
R2 Collarini |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | 6-1 3-1 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 11 | 31 | |
| pts | 61-47 | 47-23 | 108-70 | |
| Total points | 108 | 70 | 178 | |
| Winners | 28 | 21 | 49 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 0 | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 33/55 | 26/37 | 59/92 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 70% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 28/33 | 21/26 | 49/59 | |
| % 1st pts | 85% | 81% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/22 | 6/11 | 21/33 | |
| % 2nd pts | 68% | 55% | 64% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Converted | 2/3 | 3/3 | 5/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 100% | 83% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2/2 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Fatic | ||||||
| Q1 Genovese |
Q3 Martineau |
R1 Zeppieri |
R2 Gigante |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | 6-2 6-4 | 7-64 2-6 6-1 | 4-6 7-64 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 10 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 18 | 28 | 32 | 93 | |
| pts | 60-33 | 55-44 | 81-79 | 102-87 | 298-243 | |
| Total points | 93 | 99 | 160 | 189 | 541 | |
| Winners | 21 | 31 | 42 | 43 | 137 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 56% | 52% | 42% | 46% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 6 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 25 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 24/36 | 38/51 | 58/87 | 58/91 | 178/265 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 75% | 67% | 64% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 21/24 | 31/38 | 42/58 | 43/58 | 137/178 | |
| % 1st pts | 88% | 82% | 72% | 74% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/12 | 7/13 | 17/29 | 21/33 | 53/87 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 54% | 59% | 64% | 61% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 5 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 14 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 3/6 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 14/28 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 50% | 40% | 40% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 1 | 5 | 7 | 13 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 1/1 | 3/5 | 3/7 | 7 | |
| Saved % | – | 100% | 60% | 43% | 102% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLLLLWWW
LLLLWLLLLW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Pedro CachinCachin – Nerman FaticFatic (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alexandre MullerMuller – Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Edoardo LavagnoLavagno – Raul BrancaccioBrancaccio (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli – Fabian MarozsanMarozsan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
