Jan Choinski and Sumit Nagal will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Troisdorf Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 5:30 pm on SATURN CENTER COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Sumit Nagal who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Sumit Nagal is the pick to win this match.
Sumit Nagal -> 1.74
Jan Choinski -> 2.01
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jan Choinski vs. Sumit Nagal
This will be the 3rd time that Jan Choinski and Sumit Nagal square off. The head to head is 2-0 for Nagal (see full H2H stats), 2-0 on clay.
The last time that they played, Nagal won 6-4 7-5 in the 1st round in Poland F5 back in 2016.
Jan Choinski
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 33-33 | 4-4 | 24-16 | 5-9 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 41-35 | 1-4 | 30-19 | 5-5 | 2-5 | 3-2 |
| 2022 | 46-21 | 5-5 | 35-14 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 177 (career-high), Choinski reached the 2nd round after defeating Jose Pereira 6-4 6-3.
In the 1st round, The German had a good straight sets win against Pereira (6-4 6-3). During the match, Choinski scored 79 points vs Pereira’s 62. Jan was exceptionally aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about the service games, Choinski blasted 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Jan Choinski was pretty effective on serve to win 73% (29/40) of his 1st serve and 74% (14/19) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Jan broke Pereira twice after converting 14% of his break points (2/14).
Choinski has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 62% of his matches (323-201). 15-9 on clay in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Choinski has an overall 172-96 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
The German’s best result of the season was getting to the semifinal in M25 Nussloch,the Cherbourg Challenger,the Mexico City Challenger and the San Luis Potosi Challenger.
Choinski has an overall 24-16 win-loss record in 2023, 15-9 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Troisdorf Challenger
The German has never competed in this tournament before.
Sumit Nagal
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 32-29 | 15-13 | 16-11 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-29 | 9-8 | 32-17 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 17-18 | 0-1 | 16-17 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-26 | 1-4 | 22-22 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-14 | 2-4 | 5-5 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 254, Nagal reached the 2nd round after beating Sergey Fomin 6-1 6-1 and Dimitar Kuzmanov 6-3 1-6 7-5.
In the 1st round, Sumit defeated Kuzmanov (6-3 1-6 7-5). During the match Nagal scored 85 points vs Kuzmanov’s 80. Sumit was exceptionally aggressive to blast 47 winners.
Talking about serving, Nagal scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Sumit Nagal lost the serve 6 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Nagal put 87% of his first serves in, winning 61% (47/77) of the points behind his 1st serve and 17% (2/12) on the 2nd serve. The Indian broke Kuzmanov 6 times after converting 50% of his break points (6/12).
His best result of the current season was conquering the title the Rome Challenger where he overcame Jesper De Jong in the final 6-3 6-2.
The Indian has a compiled 24-13 win-loss record in 2023, 16-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Choinski | Nagal |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 42 |
| Pts | 79-62 | 143-110 |
| Total Points | 141 | 253 |
| Winners | 29 | 67 |
| %Winners | 37% | 47% |
Choinski played 1 match while Nagal competed in 2 matches. Nagal started his run from the qualifications while Choinski had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Sumit Nagal lost 1 set while Jan Choinski hasn’t dropped a set so far. Choinski has played 3 set(s) less than Nagal (2 vs 5). Therefore, Choinski played 23 games less than Nagal. Jan scored 29 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, The Indian fired 67 winners (47%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Choinski | Nagal |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 1 |
| 1st in | 40/59 | 104/133 |
| %1st in | 68% | 78% |
| 1st pts | 29/40 | 67/104 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 64% |
| 2nd pts | 14/19 | 11/29 |
| %2nd pts | 74% | 38% |
Choinski managed to score 3 aces . Nagal fired 2 aces (1 per match). Choinski won 73% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 74% of the points. On the other side, Nagal won 64% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 38% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Choinski | Nagal |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 12 |
| Converted | 2/14 | 12/21 |
| % Converted | 14% | 57% |
| Conceded | 2 | 17 |
| Saved | 2 | 10 |
| % Saved | 100% | 59% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 7 |
Jan broke his opponent twice with a 14% conversion rate. Jan extremely effective on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 2 break points. Nagal broke his opponents 12 times with a 57% conversion rate. Sumit conceded his serve 7 times and he saved 59% of the break points that he conceded.
| Choinski | |||
| R1 Pereira |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 79-62 | 79-62 | |
| Total points | 141 | 141 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 40/59 | 40/59 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 29/40 | 29/40 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/19 | 14/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 74% | 74% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/14 | 2/14 | |
| Converted % | 14% | 14% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Nagal | |||||
| Q1 Fomin |
Q3 Strombachs |
R1 Kuzmanov |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-1 | 6-1 7-64 | 6-3 1-6 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 20 | 28 | 62 | |
| pts | 58-30 | – | 85-80 | 143-110 | |
| Total points | 88 | 0 | 165 | 253 | |
| Winners | 20 | 47 | 67 | ||
| %Winners | 34% | 0% | 55% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||
| 1st in | 27/44 | / | 77/89 | 104/133 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 0% | 87% | 78% | |
| 1st pts | 20/27 | / | 47/77 | 67/104 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 0% | 61% | 64% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/17 | / | 2/12 | 11/29 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 0% | 17% | 38% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 6 | 6 | 12 | ||
| Converted | 6/9 | / | 6/12 | 12/21 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 0% | 50% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 12 | 17 | ||
| Saved | 4/5 | 0/ | 6/12 | 10 | |
| Saved % | 80% | – | 50% | 130% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 6 | 7 | ||
Head 2 Head
LWWLLLWWLL
LLLLWLLLLL Tennis Scores in Troisdorf Challenger
- Ivan GakhovGakhov – Lukas KleinKlein (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Nick HardtHardt – Mats MoraingMoraing (6-2 1-6 7-64) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva – Benjamin HassanHassan (6-3 3-6 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Renzo OlivoOlivo – Seong Chan HongChan Hong (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hernan CasanovaCasanova – Robert StrombachsStrombachs (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ivan GakhovGakhov – Nick HardtHardt (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Sumit NagalNagal – Jan ChoinskiChoinski (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Karl FribergFriberg – Oleksii KrutykhKrutykh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pavel KotovKotov – Terence AtmaneAtmane (0-0) – H2H and prediction
