Peter Gojowczyk and Giles Hussey will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Little Rock Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 10:00 am on COURT 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Peter Gojowczyk who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Peter Gojowczyk is the pick to win this match.
Peter Gojowczyk -> 1.47
Giles Hussey -> 2.54
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Peter Gojowczyk vs. Giles Hussey
There is no head to head record between Peter Gojowczyk and Giles Hussey since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Peter Gojowczyk
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 29-21 | 21-12 | 5-3 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 13-25 | 6-10 | 0-4 | 4-7 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 33-26 | 9-4 | 3-7 | 16-12 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 5-8 | 5-6 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 21-35 | 9-16 | 1-6 | 8-7 | 1-5 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 333, Gojowczyk reached the qualifications after beating Alafia Ayeni 6-74 7-63 6-0.
In the qualifications against Ayeni, Gojowczyk recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-74 7-63 6-0). During the match, Gojowczyk scored 114 points vs Ayeni’s 97. The German was quite aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Talking about the service games, Gojowczyk made 8 aces and he committed only 9 double faults. Peter Gojowczyk lost the serve 3 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Gojowczyk put 47% of his first serves in, winning 78% (36/46) of the points behind his 1st serve and 49% (25/51) on the 2nd serve. Peter broke Ayeni 6 times after converting 55% of his break points (6/11).
Gojowczyk has positive record in the last 10 years having won 52% of his matches (237-220). 7-4 on hard in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Gojowczyk has an overall 112-95 match record in the last years on hard.
The German has an aggregate 8-7 win-loss record in 2023, 7-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Little Rock Challenger
Peter has never competed in this tournament before.
Giles Hussey
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 32-16 | 30-9 | 0-0 | 0-3 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-23 | 19-11 | 0-0 | 18-7 | 0-3 | 3-2 |
| 2022 | 30-25 | 16-11 | 0-1 | 12-8 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 30-15 | 23-10 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 480, Giles got to the qualifications after beating Nick Chappell 6-4 7-64.
In the qualifications, The Brit had a good straight sets win against Chappell (6-4 7-64). During the match Hussey scored 71 points vs Chappell’s 65. Hussey was exceptionally aggressive to blast 30 winners.
About the serving games, Hussey wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 3 double faults. Giles Hussey lost the serve 3 times. Furthermore, Hussey put 63% of his first serves in, winning 68% (30/44) of the points behind his 1st serve and 54% (14/26) on the 2nd serve. The Brit was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Chappell 4 times.
Giles’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in Foncenex and M25 Nottingham.
Giles has a compiled 11-8 win-loss record in 2023, 8-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gojowczyk | Hussey |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 32 | 23 |
| Pts | 114-97 | 71-65 |
| Total Points | 211 | 136 |
| Winners | 36 | 30 |
| %Winners | 32% | 42% |
Both Gojowczyk and Hussey played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Peter Gojowczyk lost 1 set while Giles Hussey hasn’t conceded a set so far. Gojowczyk has played 1 set more than Hussey (3 vs 2). Therefore, Gojowczyk played 9 games more than Hussey. Gojowczyk scored 36 winners (32% of the total points). On the other side, Hussey blasted 30 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gojowczyk | Hussey |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 0 |
| 1st in | 46/97 | 44/70 |
| %1st in | 47% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 36/46 | 30/44 |
| %1st pts | 78% | 68% |
| 2nd pts | 25/51 | 14/26 |
| %2nd pts | 49% | 54% |
Gojowczyk scored 8 aces . Hussey didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Gojowczyk won 78% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 49% of the points. On the other side, Hussey won 68% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gojowczyk | Hussey |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 4 |
| Converted | 6/11 | 4/4 |
| % Converted | 55% | 100% |
| Conceded | 6 | 3 |
| Saved | 3 | 0 |
| % Saved | 50% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
The German broke his opponent 6 times with a 55% conversion rate. Gojowczyk dropped his serve 3 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Giles broke his opponent 4 times with a 100% conversion rate. Hussey conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
| Gojowczyk | |||
| Q1 Ayeni |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-74 7-63 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 32 | |
| pts | 114-97 | 114-97 | |
| Total points | 211 | 211 | |
| Winners | 36 | 36 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 9 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 46/97 | 46/97 | |
| % 1st in | 47% | 47% | |
| 1st pts | 36/46 | 36/46 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 25/51 | 25/51 | |
| % 2nd pts | 49% | 49% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/11 | 6/11 | |
| Converted % | 55% | 55% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 3/6 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Hussey | |||
| Q1 Chappell |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 71-65 | 71-65 | |
| Total points | 136 | 136 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 44/70 | 44/70 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 30/44 | 30/44 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/26 | 14/26 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/4 | 4/4 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 0/3 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
WLLWLWLLLW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Peter GojowczykGojowczyk – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski – Viktor DurasovicDurasovic (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel MasurMasur – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Skander MansouriMansouri – Aziz DougazDougaz (3-5) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tung-Lin WuWu – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christian LangmoLangmo – Bernard TomicTomic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marek GengelGengel – Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan ZhuZhu – Tristan BoyerBoyer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adam WaltonWalton – Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Colin MarkesMarkes (0-0) – H2H and prediction
