Federico Gaio and Alvaro Lopez San Martin will square off in the qualifications of the Vicenza Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 1:00 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Federico Gaio who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Federico Gaio is the pick to win this match.
Federico Gaio -> 1.58
Alvaro Lopez San Martin -> 2.27
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Federico Gaio vs. Alvaro Lopez San Martin
There is no head to head record between Federico Gaio and Alvaro Lopez San Martin since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Federico Gaio
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14-17 | 2-7 | 12-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 43-30 | 14-12 | 25-15 | 3-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 18-28 | 9-9 | 8-15 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 36-38 | 6-8 | 14-16 | 13-11 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-19 | 5-4 | 10-12 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 235, Federico got to the qualifications after defeating Gabriele Bosio 6-3 6-1.
In the qualifications, The Italian had a good straight sets win against Bosio (6-3 6-1). During the match, Gaio scored 66 points vs Bosio’s 40. Federico was quite aggressive to blast 20 winners.
Regarding the service games, Gaio blasted 5 aces and he was quite steady in conceding no double faults. Overall, Federico Gaio was very effective on serve to win 74% (20/27) of his 1st serve and 57% (12/21) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Gaio broke Bosio 6 times after converting 60% of his break points (6/10).
Gaio has favorable record in the last 10 years having won 54% of his matches (352-301). 21-8 on clay in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Gaio has an overall 244-177 record in the last years on clay.
The Italian’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M25 Monastir,M25 Vila Real de Santo Antonio and the Turin Challenger.
Gaio has a compiled 31-14 win-loss record in 2023, 21-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Vicenza Challenger
Alvaro Lopez San Martin
25 - 17win/loss
422
280
LWLWLWLWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 38-31 | 12-7 | 26-24 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 46-20 | 0-0 | 46-20 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 40-19 | 0-0 | 40-19 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 15-12 | 3-2 | 11-9 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 38-12 | 11-4 | 27-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 292 (career-high), Lopez San Martin got to the qualifications after defeating Maxime Chazal 6-2 7-65.
In the qualifications, The Spaniard had a good straight sets win against Chazal (6-2 7-65). During the match Lopez San Martin scored 87 points vs Chazal’s 67. The Spaniard was pretty aggressive to blast 33 winners.
About the serving games, Lopez San Martin managed to score 7 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Alvaro Lopez San Martin was quite effective on serve to win 72% (33/46) of his 1st serve and 66% (19/29) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Alvaro broke Chazal 3 times after converting 25% of his break points (3/12).
The Spaniard’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M15 Manacor.
The Spaniard has an overall 25-16 win-loss record in 2023, 14-10 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gaio | Lopez San Martin |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 21 |
| Pts | 66-40 | 87-67 |
| Total Points | 106 | 154 |
| Winners | 20 | 33 |
| %Winners | 30% | 38% |
Both Gaio and Lopez San Martin played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Gaio and Lopez San Martin have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Gaio played 5 games less than Lopez San Martin. The Italian scored 20 winners (30% of the total points). On the other side, Lopez San Martin fired 33 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gaio | Lopez San Martin |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 7 |
| 1st in | 27/48 | 46/75 |
| %1st in | 56% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 20/27 | 33/46 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 12/21 | 19/29 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 66% |
Gaio blasted 5 aces . Lopez San Martin bagged 7 aces . Gaio won 74% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Lopez San Martin won 72% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 66% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gaio | Lopez San Martin |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 3 |
| Converted | 6/10 | 3/12 |
| % Converted | 60% | 25% |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 |
| Saved | 5 | 6 |
| % Saved | 71% | 86% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
The Italian broke his opponent 6 times with a 60% conversion rate. The Italian surrendered his serve twice and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded. Alvaro broke his opponent 3 times with a 25% conversion rate. The Spaniard conceded his serve once and he saved 86% of the break points that he conceded.
| Gaio | |||
| Q1 Bosio |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 66-40 | 66-40 | |
| Total points | 106 | 106 | |
| Winners | 20 | 20 | |
| %Winners | 30% | 30% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 27/48 | 27/48 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 20/27 | 20/27 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/21 | 12/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/10 | 6/10 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 5/7 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 71% | 71% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Lopez San Martin | |||
| Q1 Chazal |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 87-67 | 87-67 | |
| Total points | 154 | 154 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 46/75 | 46/75 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 33/46 | 33/46 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/29 | 19/29 | |
| % 2nd pts | 66% | 66% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/12 | 3/12 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 6/7 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 86% | 86% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWWLWWW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino – Nerman FaticFatic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico GaioGaio – Alvaro Lopez San MartinLopez San Martin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giovanni FonioFonio – Vitaliy SachkoSachko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Pablo Llamas RuizLlamas Ruiz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Andrea CollariniCollarini (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Eduardo RibeiroRibeiro – Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco FortiForti – Stefano TravagliaTravaglia (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo RottoliRottoli – Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francisco ComesanaComesana – Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – Maximilian NeuchristNeuchrist (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matheus Pucinelle De AlmeidaPucinelle De Almeida – Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli (1-0) – H2H and prediction
