Brandon Holt and Luke Saville will square off in the 2nd round of the Busan Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 11:00 am on CENTER COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Brandon Holt who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Brandon Holt is the pick to win this match.
Brandon Holt -> 1.36
Luke Saville -> 2.96
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Brandon Holt vs. Luke Saville
There is no head to head record between Brandon Holt and Luke Saville since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Brandon Holt
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 41-29 | 37-24 | 1-1 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 22-24 | 14-16 | 1-2 | 7-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 52-21 | 48-17 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 3-6 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-5 | 8-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 208, Brandon got to the 2nd round after defeating Emilio Gomez 6-2 6-2.
In the 1st round, The American had a good straight sets win against Gomez (6-2 6-2). During the match, Holt scored 59 points vs Gomez’s 31. Brandon was extremely aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Talking about the service games, Holt made 4 aces and he was quite solid in conceding no double faults. Brandon Holt was extremely effective on serve to win 88% (21/24) of his 1st serve and 92% (11/12) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Brandon broke Gomez 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Holt has a solid match record in the last 8 years having won 62% of his matches (121-73). 7-9 on hard in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Holt has an overall108-62 match record in the last 8 years on hard.
Holt has an overall 11-12 win-loss record in 2023, 7-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Busan Challenger
Holt has never competed in this tournament before.
Luke Saville
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 19-21 | 11-15 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 7-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 43-26 | 28-18 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 14-5 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 18-11 | 18-9 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-4 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-7 | 1-2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 448, Luke got to the 2nd round after beating Keisuke Saitoh 6-3 6-1, Woobin Shin 6-1 6-3 and Ricardas Berankis 7-63 6-3.
In the 1st round, Luke had a good straight sets win against Berankis (7-63 6-3). During the match Saville scored 74 points vs Berankis’s 58. Luke was extremely aggressive to blast 23 winners.
About the serving games, Saville managed to score 5 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Luke Saville was very efficient on serve to win 82% (23/28) of his 1st serve and 64% (21/33) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Australian broke Berankis 3 times after converting 30% of his break points (3/10).
The Australian’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M25 Swan Hill.
Luke has a composed 19-11 win-loss record in 2023, 13-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Holt | Saville |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 54 |
| Pts | 59-31 | 196-133 |
| Total Points | 90 | 329 |
| Winners | 21 | 67 |
| %Winners | 36% | 34% |
Holt played 1 match while Saville competed in 3 matches. Saville started his run from the qualifications while Holt had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Holt has played 4 set(s) less than Saville (2 vs 6). Therefore, Holt played 38 games less than Saville. Holt scored 21 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, Saville scored 67 winners (34%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Holt | Saville |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 11 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 3.7 |
| 1st in | 24/36 | 88/152 |
| %1st in | 67% | 58% |
| 1st pts | 21/24 | 67/88 |
| %1st pts | 88% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 11/12 | 45/64 |
| %2nd pts | 92% | 70% |
Holt blasted 4 aces . Saville scored 11 aces (3.7 per match). Holt won 88% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 92% of the points. On the other side, Saville won 76% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 70% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Holt | Saville |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 12 |
| Converted | 4/7 | 12/29 |
| % Converted | 57% | 41% |
| Conceded | 0 | 9 |
| Saved | 0 | 7 |
| % Saved | 0% | 78% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
Brandon broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. The American was rock solid on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 0 break points. Luke broke his opponents 12 times with a 41% conversion rate. Saville conceded his serve twice and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded.
| Holt | |||
| R1 Gomez |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 59-31 | 59-31 | |
| Total points | 90 | 90 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 24/36 | 24/36 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 21/24 | 21/24 | |
| % 1st pts | 88% | 88% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/12 | 11/12 | |
| % 2nd pts | 92% | 92% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Saville | |||||
| Q1 Saitoh |
Q3 Shin |
R1 Berankis |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-1 | 6-1 6-3 | 7-63 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | 22 | 54 | |
| pts | 61-38 | 61-37 | 74-58 | 196-133 | |
| Total points | 99 | 98 | 132 | 329 | |
| Winners | 21 | 23 | 23 | 67 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 38% | 31% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 2 | 4 | 5 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 31/50 | 29/41 | 28/61 | 88/152 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 71% | 46% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 21/31 | 23/29 | 23/28 | 67/88 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 79% | 82% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/19 | 9/12 | 21/33 | 45/64 | |
| % 2nd pts | 79% | 75% | 64% | 70% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 5 | 3 | 12 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 5/13 | 3/10 | 12/29 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 38% | 30% | 41% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 2/3 | 2/3 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 67% | 67% | 234% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWLWWWL
LWLLLLLWLL Tennis Scores in Busan Challenger
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Hiroki MoriyaMoriya (6-72 6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Li TuTu – Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Yunseong ChungChung – Tung-Lin WuWu (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Daniel MasurMasur (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Marc PolmansPolmans (4-6 6-3 7-66) – See score progression
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – Ji Sung NamSung Nam (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Luke SavilleSaville – Ricardas BerankisBerankis (7-63 6-3) – See score progression
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Hyeon ChungChung (6-3 6-73 6-2) – See score progression
- Brandon HoltHolt – Emilio GomezGomez (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Jason JungJung – Seong Chan HongChan Hong (6-2 3-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (7-5 3-6 6-0) – See score progression
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – Omar JasikaJasika (6-76 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek – Kaichi UchidaUchida (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Max PurcellPurcell – Yuki MochizukiMochizuki (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu – Renta TokudaTokuda (7-64 6-3) – See score progression
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Lloyd HarrisHarris (7-65 6-3) – See score progression
- Max PurcellPurcell – Yuki MochizukiMochizuki (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Daniel MasurMasur (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (7-5 3-6 6-0) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jason JungJung – Christopher EubanksEubanks (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Luke SavilleSaville – Brandon HoltHolt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Rinky HijikataHijikata (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek – Li TuTu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Max PurcellPurcell – Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yunseong ChungChung – Gabriel DialloDiallo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
