Nicolas Kicker and Nerman Fatic will play each other in the 2nd round of the Prague 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 11:00 am on CENTRE COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Nicolas Kicker who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Nicolas Kicker is the pick to win this match.
Nicolas Kicker -> 1.73
Nerman Fatic -> 2.02
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Nicolas Kicker vs. Nerman Fatic
There is no head to head record between Nicolas Kicker and Nerman Fatic since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Nicolas Kicker
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6-7 | 0-2 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 11-10 | 1-1 | 10-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 27-28 | 6-6 | 20-21 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 64-21 | 17-2 | 47-19 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 204, Kicker reached the 2nd round after beating Damir Dzumhur 6-3 7-63.
In the 1st round, Kicker had a good straight sets win against Dzumhur (6-3 7-63). During the match, Kicker scored 79 points vs Dzumhur’s 66. Kicker was quite aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Regarding the service games, Kicker couldn’t to score even 1 ace in the match and he committed only 1 double fault. Nicolas Kicker lost the serve 4 times and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Kicker put 81% of his first serves in, winning 62% (34/55) of the points behind his 1st serve and 31% (4/13) on the 2nd serve. Nicolas broke Dzumhur 6 times after converting 55% of his break points (6/11).
Kicker has a solid match record in the last 9 years having won 61% of his matches (290-183). 5-6 on clay in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Kicker has a compiled258-154 record in the last 9 years on clay.
Nicolas has an aggregate 6-7 win-loss record in 2023, 5-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Prague 2 Challenger
Nicolas has never competed in this tournament before.
Nerman Fatic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14-23 | 3-4 | 10-18 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-28 | 0-1 | 35-25 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 34-27 | 0-1 | 31-19 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 37-26 | 1-1 | 30-22 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 11-3 | 0-0 | 9-1 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 268, Nerman reached the 2nd round after defeating Dan Added 5-7 6-4 6-3.
In the 1st round against Added, Nerman recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 6-4 6-3). During the match Fatic scored 95 points vs Added’s 89. The Bosnian was pretty aggressive to blast 48 winners.
Talking about serving, Fatic blasted 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Nerman Fatic lost the serve twice and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Fatic put 69% of his first serves in, winning 76% (48/63) of the points behind his 1st serve and 46% (13/28) on the 2nd serve. Nerman broke Added 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Nerman has an aggregate 6-6 win-loss record in 2023, 6-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Kicker | Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 31 |
| Pts | 79-66 | 95-89 |
| Total Points | 145 | 184 |
| Winners | 34 | 48 |
| %Winners | 43% | 51% |
Both Kicker and Fatic played 1 match. At the moment, Nerman Fatic conceded 1 set while Nicolas Kicker hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Kicker has played 1 set(s) less than Fatic (2 vs 3). Therefore, Kicker played 9 games less than Fatic. The Argentine scored 34 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, Fatic fired 48 winners (51%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Kicker | Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 5 |
| 1st in | 55/68 | 63/91 |
| %1st in | 81% | 69% |
| 1st pts | 34/55 | 48/63 |
| %1st pts | 62% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 4/13 | 13/28 |
| %2nd pts | 31% | 46% |
Kicker didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Fatic made 5 aces . Kicker won 62% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 31% of the points. On the other side, Fatic won 76% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 46% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Kicker | Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 4 |
| Converted | 6/11 | 4/8 |
| % Converted | 55% | 50% |
| Conceded | 6 | 4 |
| Saved | 2 | 2 |
| % Saved | 33% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 2 |
Kicker broke his opponent 6 times with a 55% conversion rate. Nicolas surrendered his serve 4 times and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded. The Bosnian broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. Nerman conceded his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Kicker | |||
| R1 Dzumhur |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 79-66 | 79-66 | |
| Total points | 145 | 145 | |
| Winners | 34 | 34 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 55/68 | 55/68 | |
| % 1st in | 81% | 81% | |
| 1st pts | 34/55 | 34/55 | |
| % 1st pts | 62% | 62% | |
| 2nd pts | 4/13 | 4/13 | |
| % 2nd pts | 31% | 31% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/11 | 6/11 | |
| Converted % | 55% | 55% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 2/6 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
| Fatic | |||
| R1 Added |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 5-7 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 95-89 | 95-89 | |
| Total points | 184 | 184 | |
| Winners | 48 | 48 | |
| %Winners | 51% | 51% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 63/91 | 63/91 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 48/63 | 48/63 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/28 | 13/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 46% | 46% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWWWLLLL
LLLWLLLLWW Tennis Scores in Prague 2 Challenger
- Nick HardtHardt – Federico GaioGaio (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Akira SantillanSantillan – Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng (6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki – Michael VrbenskyVrbensky (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – Michael GeertsGeerts (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Norbert GombosGombos – Rudolf MollekerMolleker (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Lukas KleinKlein – Yaroslav DeminDemin (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Dominik KoepferKoepfer – Gastao EliasElias (1-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Guido AndreozziAndreozzi – Daniel RinconRincon (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen – Dominic StrickerStricker (7-5 4-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Zachary SvajdaSvajda – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Pablo Llamas RuizLlamas Ruiz – Jiri VeselyVesely (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Evan FurnessFurness – Zdenek KolarKolar (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Alejandro Moro CanasMoro Canas – Billy HarrisHarris (6-2 3-6 6-0) – See score progression
- Jakub MensikMensik – Radu AlbotAlbot (7-64 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Nerman FaticFatic – Dan AddedAdded (5-7 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Nicolas KickerKicker – Damir DzumhurDzumhur (6-3 7-63) – See score progression
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – Michael GeertsGeerts (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Nick HardtHardt – Federico GaioGaio (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Akira SantillanSantillan – Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng (6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Norbert GombosGombos – Rudolf MollekerMolleker (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki – Michael VrbenskyVrbensky (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Alejandro Moro CanasMoro Canas – Billy HarrisHarris (6-2 3-6 6-0) – See score progression
- Zachary SvajdaSvajda – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Dominik KoepferKoepfer – Gastao EliasElias (1-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Evan FurnessFurness – Zdenek KolarKolar (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Guido AndreozziAndreozzi – Daniel RinconRincon (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Lukas KleinKlein – Yaroslav DeminDemin (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Pablo Llamas RuizLlamas Ruiz – Jiri VeselyVesely (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen – Dominic StrickerStricker (7-5 4-6 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Guido AndreozziAndreozzi – Lukas KleinKlein (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Norbert GombosGombos – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas KickerKicker – Nerman FaticFatic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dominik KoepferKoepfer – Evan FurnessFurness (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nick HardtHardt – Akira SantillanSantillan (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alejandro Moro CanasMoro Canas – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pablo Llamas RuizLlamas Ruiz – Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen (0-0) – H2H and prediction
