Vitaliy Sachko and Jakub Mensik will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Prague 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 1:30 pm on CENTRE COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jakub Mensik who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jakub Mensik is the pick to win this match.
Jakub Mensik -> 1.48
Vitaliy Sachko -> 2.51
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Vitaliy Sachko vs. Jakub Mensik
There is no head to head record between Vitaliy Sachko and Jakub Mensik since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Vitaliy Sachko
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 17-22 | 3-4 | 14-17 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 47-32 | 4-3 | 28-16 | 15-12 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
2022 | 24-33 | 2-3 | 12-18 | 8-10 | 0-1 | 2-1 |
2021 | 42-28 | 0-2 | 24-17 | 18-7 | 0-0 | 0-2 |
2020 | 21-12 | 8-5 | 7-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 282, Vitaliy reached the 2nd round after beating Johannes Haerteis 5-7 6-2 6-1 and Michael Geerts 6-1 6-1.
In the 1st round, Sachko had a good straight sets win against Geerts (6-1 6-1). During the match, Sachko scored 63 points vs Geerts’s 37. Sachko was pretty aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Talking about the service games, Sachko struck 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Vitaliy Sachko was extremely effective on serve to win 88% (23/26) of his 1st serve and 55% (6/11) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Ukrainian broke Geerts 5 times after converting 42% of his break points (5/12).
Sachko has a solid win-loss record in the last 9 years having won 60% of his matches (260-176). 4-3 on clay in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Sachko has an overall154-104 record in the last 9 years on clay.
Vitaliy has an aggregate 20-12 win-loss record in 2023, 4-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Prague 2 Challenger
Jakub Mensik
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 32-21 | 22-11 | 6-4 | 2-1 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
2023 | 37-23 | 10-6 | 17-11 | 10-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 37-16 | 18-4 | 17-10 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
2021 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 333 (career-high), the Czech reached the 2nd round after beating Radu Albot 7-64 4-6 6-3.
In the 1st round, The Czech defeated Albot (7-64 4-6 6-3). During the match Mensik scored 107 points vs Albot’s 104. The Czech was exceptionally aggressive to blast 51 winners.
Talking about serving, Mensik struck 10 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Jakub Mensik lost the serve twice and he saved 12 break points. Furthermore, Mensik put 56% of his first serves in, winning 73% (51/70) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (27/54) on the 2nd serve. Mensik broke Albot twice after converting 50% of his break points (2/4).
Mensik’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M25 Trnava.
The Czech has a composed 13-8 win-loss record in 2023, 2-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Prague 2 Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the semifinal in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Sachko | Mensik |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 1 |
Tot Set | 5 | 3 |
Tot Games | 41 | 32 |
Pts | 159-107 | 107-104 |
Total Points | 266 | 211 |
Winners | 63 | 51 |
%Winners | 40% | 48% |
Sachko played 2 matches while Mensik competed in 1 match. Sachko started his run from the qualifications while Mensik had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Vitaliy Sachko surrendered 1 set, while Jakub Mensik lost 1 set. Sachko has played 2 sets more than Mensik (5 vs 3). Therefore, Sachko played 9 games more than Mensik. Sachko scored 63 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, Mensik made 51 winners (48%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Sachko | Mensik |
---|---|---|
Aces | 14 | 10 |
Avg per match | 7 | 10 |
1st in | 74/107 | 70/124 |
%1st in | 69% | 56% |
1st pts | 63/74 | 51/70 |
%1st pts | 85% | 73% |
2nd pts | 19/33 | 27/54 |
%2nd pts | 58% | 50% |
Sachko managed to score 14 aces (7 per match). Mensik blasted 10 aces . Sachko won 85% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 58% of the points. On the other side, Mensik won 73% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Sachko | Mensik |
---|---|---|
Won | 10 | 2 |
Converted | 10/29 | 2/4 |
% Converted | 34% | 50% |
Conceded | 4 | 14 |
Saved | 2 | 12 |
% Saved | 50% | 86% |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Sachko broke his opponents 10 times with a 34% conversion rate. The Ukrainian conceded his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Mensik broke his opponent twice with a 50% conversion rate. The Czech conceded his serve twice and he saved 86% of the break points that he conceded.
Sachko | |||||
Q1 Haerteis |
Q3 Molleker |
R1 Geerts |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 5-7 6-2 6-1 | 6-4 6-2 | 6-1 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |
Tot Games | 27 | 18 | 14 | 59 | |
pts | 96-70 | – | 63-37 | 159-107 | |
Total points | 166 | 0 | 100 | 266 | |
Winners | 40 | 23 | 63 | ||
%Winners | 42% | 0% | 37% | 40% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 9 | 0 | 5 | 14 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 1 | 3 | ||
1st in | 48/70 | / | 26/37 | 74/107 | |
% 1st in | 69% | 0% | 70% | 69% | |
1st pts | 40/48 | / | 23/26 | 63/74 | |
% 1st pts | 83% | 0% | 88% | 85% | |
2nd pts | 13/22 | / | 6/11 | 19/33 | |
% 2nd pts | 59% | 0% | 55% | 58% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 5 | 5 | 10 | ||
Converted | 5/17 | / | 5/12 | 10/29 | |
Converted % | 29% | 0% | 42% | 34% | |
Conceded | 4 | 0 | 4 | ||
Saved | 2/4 | 0/ | 0/0 | 2 | |
Saved % | 50% | – | – | 17% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Mensik | |||||
R1 Albot |
Total | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-64 4-6 6-3 | ||||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |||
Tot Games | 32 | 32 | |||
pts | 107-104 | 107-104 | |||
Total points | 211 | 211 | |||
Winners | 51 | 51 | |||
%Winners | 48% | 48% | |||
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 10 | 10 | |||
Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |||
1st in | 70/124 | 70/124 | |||
% 1st in | 56% | 56% | |||
1st pts | 51/70 | 51/70 | |||
% 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |||
2nd pts | 27/54 | 27/54 | |||
% 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |||
Breaks | |||||
Won | 2 | 2 | |||
Converted | 2/4 | 2/4 | |||
Converted % | 50% | 50% | |||
Conceded | 14 | 14 | |||
Saved | 12/14 | 12 | |||
Saved % | 86% | 29% | |||
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Prague 2 Challenger
- Pablo Llamas RuizLlamas Ruiz – Jiri VeselyVesely (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Evan FurnessFurness – Zdenek KolarKolar (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Alejandro Moro CanasMoro Canas – Billy HarrisHarris (6-2 3-6 6-0) – See score progression
- Nick HardtHardt – Federico GaioGaio (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Akira SantillanSantillan – Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng (6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki – Michael VrbenskyVrbensky (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – Michael GeertsGeerts (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Norbert GombosGombos – Rudolf MollekerMolleker (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Lukas KleinKlein – Yaroslav DeminDemin (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Dominik KoepferKoepfer – Gastao EliasElias (1-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Guido AndreozziAndreozzi – Daniel RinconRincon (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen – Dominic StrickerStricker (7-5 4-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Zachary SvajdaSvajda – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Nerman FaticFatic – Dan AddedAdded (5-7 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Nicolas KickerKicker – Damir DzumhurDzumhur (6-3 7-63) – See score progression
- Jakub MensikMensik – Radu AlbotAlbot (7-64 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – Michael GeertsGeerts (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Nick HardtHardt – Federico GaioGaio (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Akira SantillanSantillan – Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng (6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Norbert GombosGombos – Rudolf MollekerMolleker (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki – Michael VrbenskyVrbensky (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Alejandro Moro CanasMoro Canas – Billy HarrisHarris (6-2 3-6 6-0) – See score progression
- Zachary SvajdaSvajda – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Dominik KoepferKoepfer – Gastao EliasElias (1-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Evan FurnessFurness – Zdenek KolarKolar (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Guido AndreozziAndreozzi – Daniel RinconRincon (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Lukas KleinKlein – Yaroslav DeminDemin (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Pablo Llamas RuizLlamas Ruiz – Jiri VeselyVesely (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen – Dominic StrickerStricker (7-5 4-6 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Guido AndreozziAndreozzi – Lukas KleinKlein (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Norbert GombosGombos – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas KickerKicker – Nerman FaticFatic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dominik KoepferKoepfer – Evan FurnessFurness (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nick HardtHardt – Akira SantillanSantillan (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alejandro Moro CanasMoro Canas – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pablo Llamas RuizLlamas Ruiz – Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen (0-0) – H2H and prediction