Peter Gojowczyk and Tatsuma Ito will play each other in the qualifications of the Gwangju Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 10:30 am on SHOW COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Peter Gojowczyk who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Peter Gojowczyk is the pick to win this match.
Peter Gojowczyk -> 1.48
Tatsuma Ito -> 2.52
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Peter Gojowczyk vs. Tatsuma Ito
This will be the 3rd time that Peter Gojowczyk and Tatsuma Ito clash against each other. The head to head is 1-1 (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they played each other, Ito won 5-7 6-1 6-4 in the qualifications in Tokyo back in 2019.
Peter Gojowczyk
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 29-21 | 21-12 | 5-3 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 13-25 | 6-10 | 0-4 | 4-7 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 33-26 | 9-4 | 3-7 | 16-12 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 5-8 | 5-6 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 21-35 | 9-16 | 1-6 | 8-7 | 1-5 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 345, Gojowczyk got to the qualifications after defeating Shinji Hazawa 6-1 6-3.
In the qualifications, Gojowczyk had a good straight sets win against Hazawa (6-1 6-3). During the match, Gojowczyk scored 55 points vs Hazawa’s 32. Peter was very aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Regarding the service games, Gojowczyk scored just 1 ace in the encounter and he committed only 2 double faults. Peter Gojowczyk was very effective on serve to win 92% (22/24) of his 1st serve and 55% (11/20) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Peter broke Hazawa 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Gojowczyk has good match record in the last 10 years having won 52% of his matches (235-218). 5-2 on hard in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Gojowczyk has a composed 110-93 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
Peter has an overall 6-5 win-loss record in 2023, 5-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Gwangju Challenger
Peter has never competed in this tournament before.
Tatsuma Ito
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-18 | 14-14 | 10-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 11-8 | 11-7 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 10-23 | 6-12 | 1-3 | 2-6 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-6 | 2-3 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 578, Tatsuma got to the qualifications after beating Edan Leshem 6-1 6-4.
In the qualifications, Ito had a good straight sets win against Leshem (6-1 6-4). During the match Ito scored 75 points vs Leshem’s 63. Ito was pretty aggressive to blast 31 winners.
About the serving games, Ito wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 2 double faults. Tatsuma Ito lost the serve once and he saved 11 break points. Furthermore, Ito put 53% of his first serves in, winning 67% (31/46) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (19/40) on the 2nd serve. Tatsuma broke Leshem 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
The Japanese’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M25 Canberra.
Tatsuma has a compiled 11-5 win-loss record in 2023, 5-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gojowczyk | Ito |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 17 |
| Pts | 55-32 | 75-63 |
| Total Points | 87 | 138 |
| Winners | 22 | 31 |
| %Winners | 40% | 41% |
Both Gojowczyk and Ito played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Gojowczyk and Ito have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Gojowczyk played 1 game less than Ito. Peter scored 22 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, The Japanese made 31 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gojowczyk | Ito |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 0 |
| 1st in | 24/44 | 46/86 |
| %1st in | 55% | 53% |
| 1st pts | 22/24 | 31/46 |
| %1st pts | 92% | 67% |
| 2nd pts | 11/20 | 19/40 |
| %2nd pts | 55% | 48% |
Gojowczyk recorded 1 ace . Ito didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Gojowczyk won 92% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Ito won 67% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gojowczyk | Ito |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/8 |
| % Converted | 67% | 50% |
| Conceded | 0 | 12 |
| Saved | 0 | 11 |
| % Saved | 0% | 92% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Peter broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. The German extremely effective on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 0 break points. The Japanese broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Japanese conceded his serve once and he saved 92% of the break points that he conceded.
| Gojowczyk | |||
| Q1 Hazawa |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 55-32 | 55-32 | |
| Total points | 87 | 87 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 24/44 | 24/44 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 22/24 | 22/24 | |
| % 1st pts | 92% | 92% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/20 | 11/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Ito | |||
| Q1 Leshem |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 75-63 | 75-63 | |
| Total points | 138 | 138 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 46/86 | 46/86 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 31/46 | 31/46 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/40 | 19/40 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 12 | 12 | |
| Saved | 11/12 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 92% | 92% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Tatsuma ItoIto – Peter GojowczykGojowczyk (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jason JungJung – Hiroki MoriyaMoriya (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Cem IlkelIlkel – Brandon HoltHolt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel MasurMasur – Dayne KellyKelly (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek – Emilio GomezGomez (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Omar JasikaJasika – Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Max PurcellPurcell – Richard BerankisBerankis (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yunseong ChungChung – Kaichi UchidaUchida (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Li TuTu (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Christopher EubanksEubanks (4-1) – H2H and prediction
- Uisung ParkPark – Jordan ThompsonThompson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – Gabriel DialloDiallo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete – Sanhui ShinShin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Luke SavilleSaville (3-1) – H2H and prediction
