Daniel Masur and Dayne Kelly will face off in the qualifications of the Gwangju Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 1:00 pm on CENTER COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daniel Masur who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Daniel Masur is the pick to win this match.
Daniel Masur -> 1.63
Dayne Kelly -> 2.18
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Daniel Masur vs. Dayne Kelly
This will be the 2nd time that Daniel Masur and Dayne Kelly face off. The head to head is 1-0 for Kelly (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they fought against each other, Kelly won 6-4 6-4 in the qualifications in the Happy Valley Challenger back in 2017.
Daniel Masur
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 47-26 | 1-2 | 11-10 | 22-11 | 1-2 | 12-1 |
| 2023 | 34-24 | 7-8 | 9-7 | 9-5 | 0-1 | 9-3 |
| 2022 | 25-28 | 7-8 | 5-6 | 4-9 | 5-3 | 4-2 |
| 2021 | 28-26 | 4-4 | 1-7 | 15-12 | 3-2 | 5-1 |
| 2020 | 15-14 | 3-2 | 2-5 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 4-2 |
Ranked no. 271, Masur reached the qualifications after defeating Daisuke Sumizawa 6-0 6-4.
In the qualifications, Masur had a good straight sets win against Sumizawa (6-0 6-4). During the match, Masur scored 63 points vs Sumizawa’s 39. The German was very aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Regarding the service games, Masur made 3 aces and he was pretty consistent in conceding no double faults. Daniel Masur was quite effective on serve to win 81% (25/31) of his 1st serve and 88% (7/8) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Masur broke Sumizawa 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Masur has good win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 57% of his matches (324-242). 1-1 on hard in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Masur has an aggregate 79-57 match record in the last years on hard.
Daniel’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M25 Nussloch and M15 Oberhaching.
The German has an overall 16-7 win-loss record in 2023, 1-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Gwangju Challenger
Masur has never competed in this tournament before.
Dayne Kelly
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 22-12 | 18-10 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 37-23 | 33-21 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 17-12 | 9-4 | 7-6 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 9-7 | 4-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 5-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 343, Kelly got to the qualifications after beating Seon Yong Han 6-2 7-62.
In the qualifications, Kelly had a good straight sets win against Yong Han (6-2 7-62). During the match Kelly scored 75 points vs Yong Han’s 61. Dayne was exceptionally aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about serving, Kelly managed to score 3 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Dayne Kelly lost the serve twice and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Kelly put 62% of his first serves in, winning 70% (31/44) of the points behind his 1st serve and 56% (15/27) on the 2nd serve. The Australian broke Yong Han 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Dayne’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M15 Singapore and M25 Jakarta.
The Australian has a composed 21-8 win-loss record in 2023, 17-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Masur | Kelly |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 21 |
| Pts | 63-39 | 75-61 |
| Total Points | 102 | 136 |
| Winners | 25 | 31 |
| %Winners | 40% | 41% |
Both Masur and Kelly played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Masur and Kelly have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Masur played 5 games less than Kelly. Masur scored 25 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, The Australian fired 31 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Masur | Kelly |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 3 |
| 1st in | 31/39 | 44/71 |
| %1st in | 79% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 25/31 | 31/44 |
| %1st pts | 81% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 7/8 | 15/27 |
| %2nd pts | 88% | 56% |
Masur made 3 aces . Kelly scored 3 aces . Masur won 81% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 88% of the points. On the other side, Kelly won 70% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Masur | Kelly |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/7 |
| % Converted | 50% | 57% |
| Conceded | 0 | 7 |
| Saved | 0 | 5 |
| % Saved | 0% | 71% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
Masur broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. Masur had a solid display on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points. Dayne broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. Dayne conceded his serve twice and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded.
| Masur | |||
| Q1 Sumizawa |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 63-39 | 63-39 | |
| Total points | 102 | 102 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 31/39 | 31/39 | |
| % 1st in | 79% | 79% | |
| 1st pts | 25/31 | 25/31 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/8 | 7/8 | |
| % 2nd pts | 88% | 88% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Kelly | |||
| Q1 Yong |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 7-62 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 75-61 | 75-61 | |
| Total points | 136 | 136 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 44/71 | 44/71 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 31/44 | 31/44 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/27 | 15/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 5/7 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 71% | 71% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWLWLWW
LWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Tatsuma ItoIto – Peter GojowczykGojowczyk (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jason JungJung – Hiroki MoriyaMoriya (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Cem IlkelIlkel – Brandon HoltHolt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel MasurMasur – Dayne KellyKelly (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek – Emilio GomezGomez (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Omar JasikaJasika – Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Max PurcellPurcell – Richard BerankisBerankis (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yunseong ChungChung – Kaichi UchidaUchida (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Li TuTu (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Christopher EubanksEubanks (4-1) – H2H and prediction
- Uisung ParkPark – Jordan ThompsonThompson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – Gabriel DialloDiallo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete – Sanhui ShinShin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Luke SavilleSaville (3-1) – H2H and prediction
