Joris De Loore and Sumit Nagal will clash against each other in the semifinal of the Rome Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Saturday at 12:30 pm on CAMPO CENTRALE. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Sumit Nagal who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Sumit Nagal is the pick to win this match.
Sumit Nagal -> 1.78
Joris De Loore -> 1.98
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Joris De Loore vs. Sumit Nagal
There is no head to head record between Joris De Loore and Sumit Nagal since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Joris De Loore
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 12-17 | 1-2 | 4-8 | 5-5 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 45-25 | 5-3 | 10-8 | 27-11 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 40-18 | 14-4 | 22-10 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 15-8 | 0-1 | 5-6 | 10-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 198, De Loore reached the semifinal after beating Michael Geerts 6-2 6-2, Gabriele Piraino 6-76 6-1 6-4 and Alexander Ritschard 5-7 6-1 6-4.
In the quarter against Ritschard, Joris recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 6-1 6-4). During the match, De Loore scored 94 points vs Ritschard’s 80. De Loore was pretty aggressive to blast 49 winners.
Regarding the service games, De Loore fired 3 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Joris De Loore lost the serve twice and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, De Loore put 68% of his first serves in, winning 73% (49/67) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (14/31) on the 2nd serve. The Belgian broke Ritschard 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Joris has lost 2 set in this tournament to conquer 56% of the points he played.
De Loore has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 66% of his matches (210-107). 3-1 on clay in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, De Loore has an aggregate 87-48 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
His best result of the current year was winning the title the Oeiras 1 Challenger where he overcame Filip Cristian Jianu in the final 6-3 6-2.
De Loore has a composed 24-7 win-loss record in 2023, 3-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Rome Challenger
Joris has never competed in this tournament before.
Sumit Nagal
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 30-16 | 15-8 | 15-7 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-29 | 9-8 | 32-17 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 17-18 | 0-1 | 16-17 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-26 | 1-4 | 22-22 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-14 | 2-4 | 5-5 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 347, Sumit got to the semifinal after beating Jacopo Berrettini 6-4 6-1, Viktor Durasovic 7-5 5-7 6-2, Francesco Maestrelli 6-2 6-4, Fausto Tabacco 6-3 6-0 and Max Houkes 7-5 6-0.
In the quarter, The Indian had a good straight sets win against Houkes (7-5 6-0). During the match Nagal scored 65 points vs Houkes’s 37. Sumit was very aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about serving, Nagal was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he was extremely consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Sumit Nagal was very effective on serve to win 88% (28/32) of his 1st serve and 63% (10/16) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Indian broke Houkes 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Indian started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 58% of the points he played.
Nagal’s best result of the season was getting to the semifinal in the Chennai Challenger.
Sumit has an aggregate 16-10 win-loss record in 2023, 8-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | De Loore | Nagal |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 5 |
| Tot Set | 8 | 11 |
| Tot Games | 75 | 100 |
| Pts | 268-209 | 370-273 |
| Total Points | 477 | 643 |
| Winners | 108 | 157 |
| %Winners | 40% | 42% |
De Loore played 3 matches while Nagal competed in 5 matches. Nagal started his run from the qualifications while De Loore had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Joris De Loore conceded 2 sets, while Sumit Nagal dropped 1 set. De Loore has played 3 set(s) less than Nagal (8 vs 11). Therefore, De Loore played 25 games less than Nagal. The Belgian scored 108 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, Nagal fired 157 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | De Loore | Nagal |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 18 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 0.8 |
| 1st in | 141/229 | 231/316 |
| %1st in | 62% | 73% |
| 1st pts | 108/141 | 157/231 |
| %1st pts | 77% | 68% |
| 2nd pts | 45/88 | 50/85 |
| %2nd pts | 51% | 59% |
De Loore made 18 aces (6 per match). Nagal scored 4 aces (0.8 per match). De Loore won 77% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 51% of the points. On the other side, Nagal won 68% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | De Loore | Nagal |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 15 | 25 |
| Converted | 15/25 | 25/39 |
| % Converted | 60% | 64% |
| Conceded | 16 | 22 |
| Saved | 10 | 14 |
| % Saved | 63% | 64% |
| Times Broken | 6 | 8 |
Joris broke his opponents 15 times with a 60% conversion rate. The Belgian dropped his serve 6 times and he saved 63% of the break points that he conceded. Nagal broke his opponents 25 times with a 64% conversion rate. Nagal conceded his serve 8 times and he saved 64% of the break points that he conceded.
| De Loore | |||||
| R1 Geerts |
R2 Piraino |
1/4 Ritschard |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-2 | 6-76 6-1 6-4 | 5-7 6-1 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 30 | 29 | 75 | |
| pts | 56-35 | 118-94 | 94-80 | 268-209 | |
| Total points | 91 | 212 | 174 | 477 | |
| Winners | 22 | 37 | 49 | 108 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 31% | 52% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 7 | 8 | 3 | 18 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 26/43 | 48/88 | 67/98 | 141/229 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 55% | 68% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 22/26 | 37/48 | 49/67 | 108/141 | |
| % 1st pts | 85% | 77% | 73% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/17 | 20/40 | 14/31 | 45/88 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 50% | 45% | 51% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 7 | 4 | 15 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 7/15 | 4/5 | 15/25 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 47% | 80% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 6 | 8 | 16 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2/6 | 6/8 | 10 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 33% | 75% | 69% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6 | |
| Nagal | |||||||
| Q1 Berrettini |
Q3 Durasovic |
R1 Maestrelli |
R2 Tabacco |
1/4 Houkes |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-1 | 7-5 5-7 6-2 | 6-2 6-4 | 6-3 6-0 | 7-5 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 11 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 32 | 18 | 15 | 18 | 100 | |
| pts | 68-53 | 112-104 | 61-40 | 64-39 | 65-37 | 370-273 | |
| Total points | 121 | 216 | 101 | 103 | 102 | 643 | |
| Winners | 22 | 54 | 23 | 30 | 28 | 157 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 48% | 38% | 47% | 43% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||||||
| Aces | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 35/54 | 93/117 | 30/44 | 41/53 | 32/48 | 231/316 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 79% | 68% | 77% | 67% | 73% | |
| 1st pts | 22/35 | 54/93 | 23/30 | 30/41 | 28/32 | 157/231 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 58% | 77% | 73% | 88% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/19 | 13/24 | 10/14 | 7/12 | 10/16 | 50/85 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 54% | 71% | 58% | 63% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||||||
| Won | 6 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 25 | |
| Converted | 6/8 | 7/11 | 4/6 | 4/8 | 4/6 | 25/39 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 64% | 67% | 50% | 67% | 64% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 14 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 22 | |
| Saved | 0/2 | 9/14 | 1/2 | 2/2 | 2/2 | 14 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 64% | 50% | 100% | 100% | 105% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 8 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLWLWLWL
WLWLLWWWWW Tennis Scores in Rome Challenger
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Joris De LooreDe Loore – Alexander RitschardRitschard (5-7 6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Franco AgamenoneAgamenone (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Sumit NagalNagal – Max HoukesHoukes (7-5 6-0) – See score progression
- Sadio Doumbia/Fabien ReboulDoumbia/Fabien Reboul – Inigo Cervantes/Oriol Roca BatallaCervantes/Oriol Roca Batalla (7-62 6-3) – See score progression
- Joris De LooreDe Loore – Alexander RitschardRitschard (5-7 6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Sumit NagalNagal – Max HoukesHoukes (7-5 6-0) – See score progression
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Franco AgamenoneAgamenone (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Joris De LooreDe Loore – Sumit NagalNagal (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Jesper De JongDe Jong (1-0) – H2H and prediction
