Luke Saville and Duckhee Lee will square off in the qualifications of the Seoul Challenger for the 4th time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 1:30 pm on COURT 2. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Luke Saville who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Luke Saville is the pick to win this match.
Luke Saville -> 1.57
Duckhee Lee -> 2.29
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Luke Saville vs. Duckhee Lee
This will be the 4th time that Luke Saville and Duckhee Lee fight against each other. The head to head is 3-0 for Saville (see full H2H stats), 2-0 on hard.
The last time that they played each other, Saville won 6-7(3) 6-2 6-3 in the 1st round in the Gimcheon Challenger back in 2018.
Luke Saville
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 16-11 | 10-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 6-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 43-26 | 28-18 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 14-5 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 18-11 | 18-9 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-4 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-7 | 1-2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 487, the Australian got to the qualifications after beating Daniel Masur 6-2 6-1.
In the qualifications, Luke had a good straight sets win against Masur (6-2 6-1). During the match, Saville scored 53 points vs Masur’s 29. Luke was very aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Talking about the service games, Saville managed to score 5 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Luke Saville was exceptionally effective on serve to win 84% (21/25) of his 1st serve and 61% (11/18) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Australian broke Masur 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Saville has favorable record in the last 10 years having won 54% of his matches (238-199). 7-6 on hard in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Saville has a compiled 154-136 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
Saville’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M25 Swan Hill.
Saville has an aggregate 13-9 win-loss record in 2023, 7-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Seoul Challenger
Duckhee Lee
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 8-5 | 8-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 33-25 | 29-22 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 25-18 | 25-17 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 10-17 | 5-6 | 5-8 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 3-5 | 3-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 793, the Korean reached the qualifications after beating Jason Jung 7-65 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Korean had a good straight sets win against Jung (7-65 6-4). During the match Hee Lee scored 76 points vs Jung’s 75. Hee Lee was very aggressive to blast 38 winners.
About the serving games, Hee Lee was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he was not very consistent on his 2nd serve to score 11 double faults. Duckhee Lee lost the serve 3 times and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Hee Lee put 66% of his first serves in, winning 70% (38/54) of the points behind his 1st serve and 39% (11/28) on the 2nd serve. Duck broke Jung 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Duck’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in M15 Sharm ElSheikh and M25 Jakarta.
The Korean has an overall 13-8 win-loss record in 2023, 13-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Saville | Hee Lee |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 15 | 23 |
| Pts | 53-29 | 76-75 |
| Total Points | 82 | 151 |
| Winners | 21 | 38 |
| %Winners | 40% | 50% |
Both Saville and Hee Lee played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Saville and Hee Lee have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Saville played 8 games less than Hee Lee. Saville scored 21 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, The Korean recorded 38 winners (50%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Saville | Hee Lee |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 0 |
| 1st in | 25/43 | 54/82 |
| %1st in | 58% | 66% |
| 1st pts | 21/25 | 38/54 |
| %1st pts | 84% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 11/18 | 11/28 |
| %2nd pts | 61% | 39% |
Saville scored 5 aces . Hee Lee didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Saville won 84% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 61% of the points. On the other side, Hee Lee won 70% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 39% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Saville | Hee Lee |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/8 |
| % Converted | 67% | 50% |
| Conceded | 0 | 5 |
| Saved | 0 | 2 |
| % Saved | 0% | 40% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 |
Saville broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. Saville extremely effective on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points. Hee Lee broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Korean conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 40% of the break points that he conceded.
| Saville | |||
| Q1 Masur |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 53-29 | 53-29 | |
| Total points | 82 | 82 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 25/43 | 25/43 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 21/25 | 21/25 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/18 | 11/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 61% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Hee Lee | |||
| Q1 Jung |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-65 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 76-75 | 76-75 | |
| Total points | 151 | 151 | |
| Winners | 38 | 38 | |
| %Winners | 50% | 50% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 11 | 11 | |
| 1st in | 54/82 | 54/82 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 38/54 | 38/54 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/28 | 11/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 39% | 39% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 2/5 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 40% | 40% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWWLWWLW
LWWLWWWWLW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy – Brandon HoltHolt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Luke SavilleSaville – Duckhee LeeLee (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Dayne KellyKelly (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ji Sung NamSung Nam – Shinji HazawaHazawa (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cem IlkelIlkel – Richard BerankisBerankis (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski – Denis KudlaKudla (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Li TuTu – Emilio GomezGomez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Jea Moon LeeMoon Lee (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Edan LeshemLeshem – Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hyeon ChungChung – Jordan ThompsonThompson (4-0) – H2H and prediction
- Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek – Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Omar JasikaJasika – Tatsuma ItoIto (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Lloyd HarrisHarris (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yuta ShimizuShimizu – Christopher EubanksEubanks (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Peter GojowczykGojowczyk (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
