Zachary Svajda and Dmitry Popko will square off in the qualifications of the Sarasota Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Tuesday at 11:00 am on COURT 7. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Zachary Svajda who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Zachary Svajda is the pick to win this match.
Zachary Svajda -> 1.52
Dmitry Popko -> 2.41
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Zachary Svajda vs. Dmitry Popko
This will be the 2nd time that Zachary Svajda and Dmitry Popko fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Popko (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on clay.
The last time that they locked horns, Popko won 7-5 1-6 7-5 in the 2nd round in the Orlando Challenger back in 2020.
Zachary Svajda
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 37-35 | 27-21 | 2-4 | 2-5 | 6-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-24 | 28-8 | 2-6 | 10-6 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-23 | 25-14 | 0-3 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 24-13 | 24-12 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 6-6 | 5-3 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 226, Svajda got to the qualifications after defeating Donald Young 7-5 1-6 6-1.
In the qualifications, Svajda defeated Young (7-5 1-6 6-1). During the match, Svajda scored 77 points vs Young’s 68. Svajda was very aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Regarding the service games, Svajda struck 3 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Zachary Svajda lost the serve 3 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Svajda put 54% of his first serves in, winning 68% (27/40) of the points behind his 1st serve and 65% (22/34) on the 2nd serve. Zachary broke Young 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Svajda has a winning record in the last 6 years having won 56% of his matches (92-71). 1-1 on clay in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Svajda has an aggregate10-11 record in the last 6 years on clay.
Svajda’s best result of the season was getting to the semifinal in M25 Malibu,M25 Wesley Chapel and the Rome Challenger.
The American has an aggregate 15-8 win-loss record in 2023, 1-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Sarasota Challenger
Dmitry Popko
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 64-33 | 7-2 | 57-28 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-20 | 1-1 | 38-18 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 18-30 | 11-11 | 7-18 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 34-34 | 0-4 | 27-19 | 7-10 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 28-23 | 13-8 | 15-10 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 437, Popko got to the qualifications after defeating Isaiah Strode 6-2 6-2.
In the qualifications, The Kazakhstani had a good straight sets win against Strode (6-2 6-2). During the match Popko scored 54 points vs Strode’s 27. Popko was pretty aggressive to blast 19 winners.
About the serving games, Popko managed to score 6 aces and he was quite solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Overall, Dmitry Popko was extremely effective on serve to win 79% (19/24) of his 1st serve and 83% (10/12) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Dmitry broke Strode 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
Dmitry has an overall 2-2 win-loss record in 2023, 2-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Sarasota Challenger
Popko has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Svajda | Popko |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 26 | 16 |
| Pts | 77-68 | 54-27 |
| Total Points | 145 | 81 |
| Winners | 27 | 19 |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% |
Both Svajda and Popko played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Zachary Svajda conceded 1 set while Dmitry Popko hasn’t lost a set so far. Svajda has played 1 set more than Popko (3 vs 2). Therefore, Svajda played 10 games more than Popko. Svajda scored 27 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, The Kazakhstani made 19 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Svajda | Popko |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 6 |
| 1st in | 40/74 | 24/36 |
| %1st in | 54% | 67% |
| 1st pts | 27/40 | 19/24 |
| %1st pts | 68% | 79% |
| 2nd pts | 22/34 | 10/12 |
| %2nd pts | 65% | 83% |
Svajda blasted 3 aces . Popko blasted 6 aces . Svajda won 68% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 65% of the points. On the other side, Popko won 79% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 83% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Svajda | Popko |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 5 |
| Converted | 4/6 | 5/7 |
| % Converted | 67% | 71% |
| Conceded | 6 | 1 |
| Saved | 3 | 0 |
| % Saved | 50% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 1 |
Zachary broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. Svajda conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Popko broke his opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. The Kazakhstani conceded his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
| Svajda | |||
| Q1 Young |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 1-6 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
| pts | 77-68 | 77-68 | |
| Total points | 145 | 145 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 40/74 | 40/74 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 27/40 | 27/40 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/34 | 22/34 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 65% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 3/6 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Popko | |||
| Q1 Strode |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 54-27 | 54-27 | |
| Total points | 81 | 81 | |
| Winners | 19 | 19 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 24/36 | 24/36 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 19/24 | 19/24 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/12 | 10/12 | |
| % 2nd pts | 83% | 83% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLWLWLWW
LLLLWWLWLL Tennis Scores in Sarasota Challenger
- Tristan BoyerBoyer – Lucas PouillePouille (7-5 4-6 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Luca PotenzaPotenza – Guido AndreozziAndreozzi (2-6 6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alex RybakovRybakov – Bruno KuzuharaKuzuhara (5-7 6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Mateus AlvesAlves – Calvin HemeryHemery (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Denis KudlaKudla – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler – Tung-Lin WuWu (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Emilio GomezGomez (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Hugo DellienDellien (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri – Christian HarrisonHarrison (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo – Bjorn FratangeloFratangelo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas MachacMachac – Gijs BrouwerBrouwer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta – Gabriel DialloDiallo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
