Ashlyn Krueger and Sachia Vickery will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Credit One Charleston Open for the 4th time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 12:00 pm on Court 3. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Ashlyn Krueger who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Ashlyn Krueger is the pick to win this match.
Ashlyn Krueger -> 1.71
Sachia Vickery -> 2.05
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Ashlyn Krueger vs. Sachia Vickery
This will be the 4th time that Ashlyn Krueger and Sachia Vickery clash against each other. The head to head is 2-1 for Vickery (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on clay.
The last time that they played each other, Krueger won 6-3 7-5 in the final in the W60 Evansville back in 2022.
Ashlyn Krueger
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 25-27 | 18-17 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 29-26 | 19-17 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 44-26 | 26-15 | 8-6 | 2-2 | 8-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 34-22 | 23-17 | 10-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 15-14 | 10-11 | 5-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 155, the American reached the qualifications after beating Robin Montgomery 6-2 7-65.
In the qualifications, The American had a good straight sets win against Montgomery (6-2 7-65). During the match, Krueger scored 77 points vs Montgomery’s 71. Ashlyn was extremely aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about the service games, Krueger bagged 3 aces and she committed only 4 double faults. Ashlyn Krueger lost the serve twice and she saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Krueger put 65% of her first serves in, winning 59% (27/46) of the points behind her 1st serve and 56% (14/25) on the 2nd serve. Ashlyn broke Montgomery 4 times after converting 40% of her break points (4/10).
Krueger has a winning win-loss record in the last 5 years having won 58% of her matches (78-57). 1-0 on clay in 2023. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Krueger has a composed17-11 match record in the last 5 years on clay.
The American’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in the W60 Orlando and the W60+H Irapuato.
Krueger has a composed 15-8 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Charleston
Krueger has never competed in this tournament before.
Sachia Vickery
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 7-11 | 7-9 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 22-21 | 14-12 | 7-6 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 36-23 | 19-12 | 13-7 | 0-0 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-26 | 25-16 | 7-7 | 3-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 15-17 | 10-10 | 3-5 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 188, Vickery got to the qualifications after beating Laura Siegemund 6-2 6-74 6-3.
In the qualifications, Sachia defeated Siegemund (6-2 6-74 6-3). During the match Vickery scored 106 points vs Siegemund’s 90. Vickery was very aggressive to blast 39 winners.
About the serving games, Vickery was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and she committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Sachia Vickery lost the serve 5 times and she saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Vickery put 64% of her first serves in, winning 60% (39/65) of the points behind her 1st serve and 46% (17/37) on the 2nd serve. Sachia broke Siegemund 8 times after converting 50% of her break points (8/16).
Vickery has a composed 9-4 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Charleston
Previously, her best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2015. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Krueger | Vickery |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 21 | 30 |
| Pts | 77-71 | 106-90 |
| Total Points | 148 | 196 |
| Winners | 27 | 39 |
| %Winners | 35% | 37% |
Both Krueger and Vickery played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Sachia Vickery lost 1 set while Ashlyn Krueger hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Krueger has played 1 set(s) less than Vickery (2 vs 3). Therefore, Krueger played 9 games less than Vickery. Ashlyn scored 27 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, Sachia struck 39 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Krueger | Vickery |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 0 |
| 1st in | 46/71 | 65/102 |
| %1st in | 65% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 27/46 | 39/65 |
| %1st pts | 59% | 60% |
| 2nd pts | 14/25 | 17/37 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 46% |
Krueger blasted 3 aces . Vickery didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Krueger won 59% points on her first serve. She very solid her second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Vickery won 60% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 46% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Krueger | Vickery |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 8 |
| Converted | 4/10 | 8/16 |
| % Converted | 40% | 50% |
| Conceded | 3 | 10 |
| Saved | 1 | 5 |
| % Saved | 33% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 5 |
Ashlyn broke her opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. The American conceded her serve twice and she saved 33% of the break points that she conceded. Sachia broke her opponent 8 times with a 50% conversion rate. Vickery conceded her serve 5 times and she saved 50% of the break points that she conceded.
| Krueger | |||
| Q1 Montgomery |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 77-71 | 77-71 | |
| Total points | 148 | 148 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 46/71 | 46/71 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 27/46 | 27/46 | |
| % 1st pts | 59% | 59% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/25 | 14/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Vickery | |||
| Q1 Siegemund |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-74 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
| pts | 106-90 | 106-90 | |
| Total points | 196 | 196 | |
| Winners | 39 | 39 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 65/102 | 65/102 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 39/65 | 39/65 | |
| % 1st pts | 60% | 60% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/37 | 17/37 | |
| % 2nd pts | 46% | 46% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 8 | 8 | |
| Converted | 8/16 | 8/16 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 5/10 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLLLLWLW
LWLLWLLLWL Tennis Scores in Charleston
- Goran MarkovicMarkovic – Luka PavlovicPavlovic (6-2 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Simone RoncalliRoncalli – Milos NikolicNikolic (6-1 6-0) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Miljan ZekicZekic – Harrison LombeLombe (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alexander BabanineBabanine – Maksim TikhomirovTikhomirov (6-3 2-6 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Domagoj BiljeskoBiljesko – Gorazd SrbljakSrbljak (6-2 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Ann LiLi – Kayla DayDay (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Anna-Lena FriedsamFriedsam – Asia MuhammadMuhammad (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Magdalena FrechFrech – Paula OrmaecheaOrmaechea (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sachia VickeryVickery – (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Katarzyna KawaKawa – Sabine LisickiLisicki (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hailey BaptisteBaptiste – Heather WatsonWatson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elvina KalievaKalieva – Louisa ChiricoChirico (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesca Di LorenzoDi Lorenzo – Katherine SebovSebov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
