Marius Copil and Mika Brunold will fight against each other in the quarter of the Biel Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 6:00 pm on CENTRE COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Marius Copil who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Marius Copil is the pick to win this match.
Marius Copil -> 1.34
Mika Brunold -> 3.125
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Marius Copil vs. Mika Brunold
There is no head to head record between Marius Copil and Mika Brunold since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Marius Copil
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 8-11 | 0-1 | 0-4 | 8-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-22 | 17-11 | 9-5 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
| 2022 | 28-27 | 5-0 | 9-13 | 11-10 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 22-19 | 1-3 | 3-7 | 9-4 | 8-3 | 1-2 |
| 2020 | 1-6 | 1-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 422, Marius reached the quarter after beating Noah Lopez 7-64 6-0, Saba Purtseladze 6-71 7-65 7-64, Marek Gengel 6-4 6-3 and Dominic Stricker 3-6 6-2 7-63.
In the 2nd round against Stricker, The Romanian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-2 7-63). During the match, Copil scored 98 points vs Stricker’s 90. Marius was quite aggressive to blast 42 winners.
Regarding the service games, Copil buried his opponent with 21 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Marius Copil was very effective on serve to win 75% (42/56) of his 1st serve and 55% (21/38) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Copil broke Stricker 3 times after converting 38% of his break points (3/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Marius started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 2 set in this event to conquer 53% of the points he played.
Copil has winning match record in the last 10 years having won 54% of his matches (259-222). 9-2 on indoor hard courts in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Copil has a composed 104-56 match record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Copil has an overall 12-4 win-loss record in 2023, 9-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Biel Challenger
Mika Brunold
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 35-22 | 3-4 | 28-14 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2023 | 23-21 | 2-3 | 10-9 | 10-8 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 11-9 | 2-2 | 5-4 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2020 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 725 (career-high), the Swiss reached the quarter after defeating Zdenek Kolar 6-1 6-4 and Max Hans Rehberg 6-2 3-6 6-3.
In the 2nd round, The Swiss defeated Hans Rehberg (6-2 3-6 6-3). During the match Brunold scored 82 points vs Hans Rehberg’s 73. Brunold was extremely aggressive to blast 34 winners.
About the serving games, Brunold made 9 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Mika Brunold lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Brunold put 60% of his first serves in, winning 65% (34/52) of the points behind his 1st serve and 62% (21/34) on the 2nd serve. The Swiss was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Hans Rehberg 4 times.
Overall Performance in this tournament
Brunold has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 54% of the points he played.
The Swiss has an aggregate 10-5 win-loss record in 2023, 7-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Biel Challenger
Brunold has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Copil | Brunold |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 4 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 10 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 107 | 43 |
| Pts | 354-314 | 153-129 |
| Total Points | 668 | 282 |
| Winners | 156 | 54 |
| %Winners | 44% | 35% |
Copil played 4 matches while Brunold competed in 2 matches. Copil started his run from the qualifications while Brunold had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Marius Copil conceded 2 sets, while Mika Brunold dropped 1 set. Copil has played 5 sets more than Brunold (10 vs 5). Therefore, Copil played 64 games more than Brunold. Marius scored 156 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, Brunold struck 54 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Copil | Brunold |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 48 | 12 |
| Avg per match | 12 | 6 |
| 1st in | 198/329 | 75/134 |
| %1st in | 60% | 56% |
| 1st pts | 156/198 | 54/75 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 76/131 | 32/59 |
| %2nd pts | 58% | 54% |
Copil scored 48 aces (12 per match). Brunold blasted 12 aces (6 per match). Copil won 79% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 58% of the points. On the other side, Brunold won 72% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Copil | Brunold |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 11 | 9 |
| Converted | 11/22 | 9/22 |
| % Converted | 50% | 41% |
| Conceded | 26 | 8 |
| Saved | 22 | 5 |
| % Saved | 85% | 63% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 3 |
The Romanian broke his opponents 11 times with a 50% conversion rate. Copil surrendered his serve 4 times and he saved 85% of the break points that he conceded. The Swiss broke his opponents 9 times with a 41% conversion rate. Mika conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 63% of the break points that he conceded.
| Copil | ||||||
| Q1 Lopez |
Q3 Purtseladze |
R1 Gengel |
R2 Stricker |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 6-0 | 6-71 7-65 7-64 | 6-4 6-3 | 3-6 6-2 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 10 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 39 | 19 | 30 | 107 | |
| pts | 72-51 | 121-123 | 63-50 | 98-90 | 354-314 | |
| Total points | 123 | 244 | 113 | 188 | 668 | |
| Winners | 28 | 61 | 25 | 42 | 156 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 50% | 40% | 43% | 44% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 11 | 7 | 9 | 21 | 48 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 34/55 | 77/124 | 31/56 | 56/94 | 198/329 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | 55% | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 28/34 | 61/77 | 25/31 | 42/56 | 156/198 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 79% | 81% | 75% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/21 | 25/47 | 15/25 | 21/38 | 76/131 | |
| % 2nd pts | 71% | 53% | 60% | 55% | 58% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 11 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 2/5 | 3/3 | 3/8 | 11/22 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 40% | 100% | 38% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 11 | 4 | 5 | 26 | |
| Saved | 6/6 | 9/11 | 4/4 | 3/5 | 22 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 82% | 100% | 60% | 86% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | |
| Brunold | ||||||
| R1 Kolar |
R2 Hans |
Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-4 | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | ||||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |||
| Tot Games | 17 | 26 | 43 | |||
| pts | 71-56 | 82-73 | 153-129 | |||
| Total points | 127 | 155 | 282 | |||
| Winners | 20 | 34 | 54 | |||
| %Winners | 28% | 41% | 35% | |||
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 3 | 9 | 12 | |||
| Double Faults | 3 | 4 | 7 | |||
| 1st in | 23/48 | 52/86 | 75/134 | |||
| % 1st in | 48% | 60% | 56% | |||
| 1st pts | 20/23 | 34/52 | 54/75 | |||
| % 1st pts | 87% | 65% | 72% | |||
| 2nd pts | 11/25 | 21/34 | 32/59 | |||
| % 2nd pts | 44% | 62% | 54% | |||
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 5 | 4 | 9 | |||
| Converted | 5/18 | 4/4 | 9/22 | |||
| Converted % | 28% | 100% | 41% | |||
| Conceded | 2 | 6 | 8 | |||
| Saved | 1/2 | 4/6 | 5 | |||
| Saved % | 50% | 67% | 29% | |||
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 3 | |||
Head 2 Head
LLLLLLLLLL
LLWWLWLWWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marius CopilCopil – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Liam BroadyBroady – Gabriel DialloDiallo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin HassanHassan – Norbert GombosGombos (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Otto VirtanenVirtanen – Jurij RodionovRodionov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
