![Prediction And Head To Head Christopher O Connell Vs. Jan Lennard Struff Od9nquq2mt Prediction and head to head Christopher O Connell vs. Jan-Lennard Struff](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Christopher-O-Connell-vs.-Jan-Lennard-Struff-OD9nquQ2mT.jpg)
Christopher O Connell and Jan-Lennard Struff will face off in the 2nd round of the Manama Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 5:30 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jan-Lennard Struff who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jan-Lennard Struff is the pick to win this match.
Jan-Lennard Struff -> 1.87
Christopher O Connell -> 1.87
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Christopher O Connell vs. Jan-Lennard Struff
This will be the 2nd time that Christopher O Connell and Jan-Lennard Struff fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for O Connell (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they squared off, O Connell won 7-6(2) 7-6(5) 6-1 in the 1st round in at the Australian Open back in 2021.
Highlights Christopher O Connell vs Jan-Lennard Struff – Australian Open 09-February-2021
Christopher O Connell
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 11-13 | 9-8 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 38-34 | 19-18 | 11-9 | 4-3 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
2022 | 50-25 | 30-16 | 12-5 | 3-1 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
2021 | 22-16 | 14-9 | 3-3 | 1-1 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
2020 | 12-12 | 4-5 | 4-3 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 96, Christopher reached the 2nd round after defeating Maximilian Neuchrist 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round, O Connell had a good straight sets win against Neuchrist (6-4 6-4). During the match, O Connell scored 69 points vs Neuchrist’s 61. Christopher was very aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about the service games, O Connell managed to score 6 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Christopher O Connell conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 3 break points. Furthermore, O Connell put 63% of his first serves in, winning 75% (33/44) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (13/26) on the 2nd serve. O Connell broke Neuchrist twice after converting 50% of his break points (2/4).
O Connell has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 64% of his matches (321-181). 2-4 on hard in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, O Connell has an aggregate 137-88 match record in the last years on hard.
Christopher has an aggregate 2-4 win-loss record in 2023, 2-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Manama Challenger
Jan-Lennard Struff
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 23-13 | 4-6 | 11-4 | 2-2 | 6-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 45-24 | 21-9 | 14-7 | 5-6 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
2022 | 23-22 | 3-10 | 7-4 | 12-4 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
2021 | 26-30 | 8-11 | 11-8 | 6-8 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
2020 | 15-15 | 10-6 | 1-3 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 156, Struff got to the 2nd round after defeating Andrey Chepelev 6-2 6-2.
In the 1st round, Jan-Lennard had a good straight sets win against Chepelev (6-2 6-2). During the match Struff scored 69 points vs Chepelev’s 46. Struff was very aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about serving, Struff recorded 12 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Jan-Lennard Struff conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 64% of his first serves in, win 84% (27/32) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (9/18) on the 2nd serve. Struff broke Chepelev 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
Struff’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in the Canberra Challenger.
Jan-Lennard has an overall 7-3 win-loss record in 2023, 7-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | O Connell | Struff |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 20 | 16 |
Pts | 69-61 | 69-46 |
Total Points | 130 | 115 |
Winners | 33 | 27 |
%Winners | 48% | 39% |
Both O Connell and Struff played 1 match. Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, O Connell and Struff have played the same amount of sets 2. However, O Connell played 4 games more than Struff. The Australian scored 33 winners (48% of the total points). On the other side, Struff managed to score 27 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
Serve | O Connell | Struff |
---|---|---|
Aces | 6 | 12 |
Avg per match | 6 | 12 |
1st in | 44/70 | 32/50 |
%1st in | 63% | 64% |
1st pts | 33/44 | 27/32 |
%1st pts | 75% | 84% |
2nd pts | 13/26 | 9/18 |
%2nd pts | 50% | 50% |
O Connell fired 6 aces . Struff managed to score 12 aces . O Connell won 75% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Struff won 84% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | O Connell | Struff |
---|---|---|
Won | 2 | 4 |
Converted | 2/4 | 4/11 |
% Converted | 50% | 36% |
Conceded | 3 | 0 |
Saved | 3 | 0 |
% Saved | 100% | 0% |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
O Connell broke his opponent twice with a 50% conversion rate. O Connell very solid his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 3 break points. The German broke his opponent 4 times with a 36% conversion rate. Jan-Lennard was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
O Connell | |||
R1 Neuchrist |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
pts | 69-61 | 69-61 | |
Total points | 130 | 130 | |
Winners | 33 | 33 | |
%Winners | 48% | 48% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 6 | 6 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 44/70 | 44/70 | |
% 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
1st pts | 33/44 | 33/44 | |
% 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
2nd pts | 13/26 | 13/26 | |
% 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 2 | 2 | |
Converted | 2/4 | 2/4 | |
Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Struff | |||
R1 Chepelev |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
pts | 69-46 | 69-46 | |
Total points | 115 | 115 | |
Winners | 27 | 27 | |
%Winners | 39% | 39% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 12 | 12 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 32/50 | 32/50 | |
% 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
1st pts | 27/32 | 27/32 | |
% 1st pts | 84% | 84% | |
2nd pts | 9/18 | 9/18 | |
% 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/11 | 4/11 | |
Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
Saved % | – | 0% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Tennis Scores in Manama Challenger
- Salvatore CarusoCaruso – Matteo ArnaldiArnaldi (3-6 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Alexandre MullerMuller – Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Alexei PopyrinPopyrin – Otto VirtanenVirtanen (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Daniel MichalskiMichalski – Yusuf QaedQaed (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Tomas MachacMachac – Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi (6-2 2-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis – Yanki ErelErel (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh – Bekkhan AtlangerievAtlangeriev (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Jan-Lennard StruffStruff – Andrey ChepelevChepelev (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – Kaichi UchidaUchida (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino – Mohamed SafwatSafwat (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Marek GengelGengel – Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu (7-63 6-72 7-63) – See score progression
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Maximilian NeuchristNeuchrist (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Pavel KotovKotov (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Daniel MichalskiMichalski – Yusuf QaedQaed (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh – Bekkhan AtlangerievAtlangeriev (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – Kaichi UchidaUchida (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino – Mohamed SafwatSafwat (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Salvatore CarusoCaruso – Matteo ArnaldiArnaldi (3-6 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Tomas MachacMachac – Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi (6-2 2-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Colin SinclairSinclair – Andrea ArnaboldiArnaboldi (7-6(3) 2-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Jan-Lennard StruffStruff – Andrey ChepelevChepelev (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis – Yanki ErelErel (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Alexandre MullerMuller – Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Viktor DurasovicDurasovic – Aleksandr BrayninBraynin (6-7(6) 6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Alexei PopyrinPopyrin – Otto VirtanenVirtanen (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jan-Lennard StruffStruff – Christopher O ConnellO Connell (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler – Stefano TravagliaTravaglia (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis – Alexandre MullerMuller (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Viktor DurasovicDurasovic – Alexei PopyrinPopyrin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marek GengelGengel – Salvatore CarusoCaruso (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas MachacMachac – Colin SinclairSinclair (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (1-0) – H2H and prediction