Fabian Marozsan and Cem Ilkel will play each other in the 2nd round of the Ottignies for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 10:00 am on COURT CENTRAL. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Fabian Marozsan who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Fabian Marozsan is the pick to win this match.
Fabian Marozsan -> 1.61
Cem Ilkel -> 2.21
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Fabian Marozsan vs. Cem Ilkel
This will be the 3rd time that Fabian Marozsan and Cem Ilkel play each other. The head to head is 1-1 for Marozsan and Ilkel (see full H2H stats),but they are 1-1 on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they played, Marozsan won 6-2 6-7(6) 6-3 in the semifinal in the Bratislava Challenger back in 2022.
Fabian Marozsan
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23-29 | 15-11 | 5-8 | 2-6 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-27 | 7-5 | 32-13 | 5-7 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 46-19 | 10-3 | 29-12 | 7-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 47-21 | 4-2 | 33-16 | 10-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 12-7 | 6-2 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 174, the Hungarian reached the 2nd round after defeating Andrea Arnaboldi 6-2 6-1.
In the 1st round, Fabian had a good straight sets win against Arnaboldi (6-2 6-1). During the match, Marozsan scored 58 points vs Arnaboldi’s 37. The Hungarian was very aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Regarding the service games, Marozsan struck 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Fabian Marozsan was pretty efficient on serve to win 75% (24/32) of his 1st serve and 62% (8/13) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Fabian broke Arnaboldi 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Marozsan has a solid record in the last 6 years having won 68% of his matches (176-84). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Marozsan has a composed18-7 record in the last 6 years on indoor hard courts.
The Hungarian has a compiled 3-3 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Louvain
The Hungarian has never competed in this tournament before.
Cem Ilkel
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 16-26 | 7-12 | 4-7 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 33-29 | 6-10 | 0-4 | 27-14 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 18-16 | 2-4 | 0-3 | 16-7 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 38-29 | 17-9 | 13-11 | 8-7 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| 2020 | 13-15 | 2-3 | 1-7 | 10-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 328, Cem got to the 2nd round after defeating Victor Ernaelsteen 7-5 6-4 and Alexander Shevchenko 6-1 6-76 6-3.
In the 1st round, Ilkel defeated Shevchenko (6-1 6-76 6-3). During the match Ilkel scored 100 points vs Shevchenko’s 81. The Turk was very aggressive to blast 45 winners.
Talking about serving, Ilkel made 4 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Cem Ilkel was extremely effective on serve to win 78% (45/58) of his 1st serve and 58% (19/33) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Ilkel broke Shevchenko 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Cem’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in the Oeiras 1 Challenger.
Ilkel has an overall 10-3 win-loss record in 2023, 10-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Marozsan | Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 15 | 51 |
| Pts | 58-37 | 175-139 |
| Total Points | 95 | 314 |
| Winners | 24 | 73 |
| %Winners | 41% | 42% |
Marozsan played 1 match while Ilkel competed in 2 matches. Ilkel started his run from the qualifications while Marozsan had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Cem Ilkel surrendered 1 set while Fabian Marozsan hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Marozsan has played 3 set(s) less than Ilkel (2 vs 5). Therefore, Marozsan played 36 games less than Ilkel. The Hungarian scored 24 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Ilkel fired 73 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Marozsan | Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 10 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 5 |
| 1st in | 32/45 | 91/145 |
| %1st in | 71% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 24/32 | 73/91 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 80% |
| 2nd pts | 8/13 | 36/54 |
| %2nd pts | 62% | 67% |
Marozsan blasted 3 aces . Ilkel recorded 10 aces (5 per match). Marozsan won 75% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points. On the other side, Ilkel won 80% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 67% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Marozsan | Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 6 |
| Converted | 4/9 | 6/16 |
| % Converted | 44% | 38% |
| Conceded | 0 | 3 |
| Saved | 0 | 2 |
| % Saved | 0% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Marozsan broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Fabian quite strong on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 0 break points. Cem broke his opponents 6 times with a 38% conversion rate. Cem conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Marozsan | |||
| R1 Arnaboldi |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 58-37 | 58-37 | |
| Total points | 95 | 95 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 32/45 | 32/45 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 24/32 | 24/32 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/13 | 8/13 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Ilkel | |||||
| Q1 Ernaelsteen |
Q3 Ymer |
R1 Shevchenko |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-4 | 6-2 6-4 | 6-1 6-76 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 18 | 29 | 69 | |
| pts | 75-58 | – | 100-81 | 175-139 | |
| Total points | 133 | 0 | 181 | 314 | |
| Winners | 28 | 45 | 73 | ||
| %Winners | 37% | 0% | 45% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 6 | 0 | 4 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
| 1st in | 33/54 | / | 58/91 | 91/145 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 0% | 64% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 28/33 | / | 45/58 | 73/91 | |
| % 1st pts | 85% | 0% | 78% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/21 | / | 19/33 | 36/54 | |
| % 2nd pts | 81% | 0% | 58% | 67% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 2 | 4 | 6 | ||
| Converted | 2/6 | / | 4/10 | 6/16 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 0% | 40% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
| Saved | 1/1 | 0/ | 1/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | – | 50% | 150% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 1 | ||
Head 2 Head
LWWLLLWLWL
LLWLLWLLWW Tennis Scores in Louvain
- Elias YmerYmer – Kenny de Schepperde Schepper (6-4 7-61) – See score progression
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – Andrea ArnaboldiArnaboldi (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek – Valentin VacherotVacherot (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Mikael YmerYmer – Raphael CollignonCollignon (6-75 6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Kaichi UchidaUchida – Alibek KachmazovKachmazov (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Gauthier OnclinOnclin – Ugo HumbertHumbert (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Cem IlkelIlkel – Alexander ShevchenkoShevchenko (6-1 6-76 6-3) – See score progression
- David GoffinGoffin – Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Joris De LooreDe Loore – Tibo ColsonColson (6-4 3-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Ernests GulbisGulbis – Lukas KleinKlein (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva – Raul BrancaccioBrancaccio (6-0 7-64) – See score progression
- Filip MisolicMisolic – Tomas MachacMachac (6-2 3-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Borna GojoGojo – Zizou BergsBergs (6-1 7-66) – See score progression
- Yannick HanfmannHanfmann – Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Ricardas BerankisBerankis – Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – Jurij RodionovRodionov (6-74 7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- David GoffinGoffin – Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Richard BerankisBerankis – Yannick HanfmannHanfmann (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- David GoffinGoffin – Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Joris De LooreDe Loore – Filip MisolicMisolic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kaichi UchidaUchida – Jozef KovalikKovalik (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elias YmerYmer – Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Borna GojoGojo – Mikael YmerYmer (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – Cem IlkelIlkel (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Gauthier OnclinOnclin – Ernests GulbisGulbis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
