Kacper Zuk and Michael Geerts will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Nonthaburi 3 Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 10:30 am on COURT B. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Kacper Zuk who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Kacper Zuk is the pick to win this match.
Kacper Zuk -> 1.74
Michael Geerts -> 2.01
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Kacper Zuk vs. Michael Geerts
This will be the 2nd time that Kacper Zuk and Michael Geerts fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Zuk (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they competed against each other, Zuk won 7-6(5) 7-6(3) in the 2nd round in M25 Vale Do Lobo back in 2020.
Kacper Zuk
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 4-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
2023 | 26-29 | 7-9 | 5-8 | 6-11 | 0-0 | 8-1 |
2022 | 35-27 | 12-7 | 6-9 | 12-9 | 0-1 | 5-1 |
2021 | 41-25 | 5-5 | 17-8 | 15-8 | 2-2 | 2-2 |
2020 | 31-9 | 6-2 | 10-4 | 15-2 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 248, Zuk got to the 2nd round after defeating Evan Furness 6-1 6-1.
In the 1st round, Kacper had a good straight sets win against Furness (6-1 6-1). During the match, Zuk scored 51 points vs Furness’s 20. Kacper was extremely aggressive to blast 18 winners.
Talking about the service games, Zuk made 4 aces and he was quite steady in conceding no double faults. Kacper Zuk was very effective on serve to win 86% (18/21) of his 1st serve and 77% (10/13) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Zuk broke Furness 5 times after converting 83% of his break points (5/6).
Zuk has a solid win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 62% of his matches (199-124). 1-2 on hard in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Zuk has an aggregate80-41 win-loss record in the last 8 years on hard.
The Pole’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in Australia.
The Pole has an aggregate 1-2 win-loss record in 2023, 1-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nonthaburi 3 Challenger
The Pole has never competed in this tournament before.
Michael Geerts
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 23-22 | 8-3 | 8-11 | 7-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 32-39 | 13-10 | 13-19 | 6-8 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
2022 | 42-37 | 5-8 | 24-14 | 11-13 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
2021 | 35-28 | 13-7 | 14-14 | 8-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 12-8 | 5-2 | 0-1 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
Ranked no. 252, Geerts got to the 2nd round after defeating Yuttana Charoenphon 6-3 6-1.
In the 1st round, The Belgian had a good straight sets win against Charoenphon (6-3 6-1). During the match Geerts scored 59 points vs Charoenphon’s 29. Geerts was very aggressive to blast 21 winners.
About the serving games, Geerts struck 9 aces and he was extremely consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Overall, Michael Geerts was very efficient on serve to win 78% (21/27) of his 1st serve and 83% (10/12) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Geerts broke Charoenphon 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
Michael has an aggregate 2-1 win-loss record in 2023, 2-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Zuk | Geerts |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 14 | 16 |
Pts | 51-20 | 59-29 |
Total Points | 71 | 88 |
Winners | 18 | 21 |
%Winners | 35% | 36% |
Both Zuk and Geerts played 1 match. Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Zuk and Geerts have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Zuk played 2 games less than Geerts. Zuk scored 18 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, Geerts struck 21 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Zuk | Geerts |
---|---|---|
Aces | 4 | 9 |
Avg per match | 4 | 9 |
1st in | 21/34 | 27/39 |
%1st in | 62% | 69% |
1st pts | 18/21 | 21/27 |
%1st pts | 86% | 78% |
2nd pts | 10/13 | 10/12 |
%2nd pts | 77% | 83% |
Zuk fired 4 aces . Geerts struck 9 aces . Zuk won 86% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 77% of the points. On the other side, Geerts won 78% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 83% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Zuk | Geerts |
---|---|---|
Won | 5 | 5 |
Converted | 5/6 | 5/7 |
% Converted | 83% | 71% |
Conceded | 0 | 1 |
Saved | 0 | 0 |
% Saved | 0% | 0% |
Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Zuk broke his opponent 5 times with a 83% conversion rate. Zuk had a solid display on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 0 break points. Michael broke his opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. Michael conceded his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
Zuk | |||
R1 Furness |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 14 | 14 | |
pts | 51-20 | 51-20 | |
Total points | 71 | 71 | |
Winners | 18 | 18 | |
%Winners | 35% | 35% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 4 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
1st in | 21/34 | 21/34 | |
% 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
1st pts | 18/21 | 18/21 | |
% 1st pts | 86% | 86% | |
2nd pts | 10/13 | 10/13 | |
% 2nd pts | 77% | 77% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/6 | 5/6 | |
Converted % | 83% | 83% | |
Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
Saved % | – | 0% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Geerts | |||
R1 Charoenphon |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
pts | 59-29 | 59-29 | |
Total points | 88 | 88 | |
Winners | 21 | 21 | |
%Winners | 36% | 36% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 9 | 9 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
1st in | 27/39 | 27/39 | |
% 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
1st pts | 21/27 | 21/27 | |
% 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
2nd pts | 10/12 | 10/12 | |
% 2nd pts | 83% | 83% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Nonthaburi 3 Challenger
- Giovanni FonioFonio – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Dan AddedAdded (1-6 6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – Stefano TravagliaTravaglia (6-1 7-64) – See score progression
- Daniel MichalskiMichalski – Dominik PalanPalan (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Jakub MensikMensik – Alexander RitschardRitschard (7-65 7-5) – See score progression
- Benjamin HassanHassan – Hiroki MoriyaMoriya (6-0 6-4) – See score progression
- Arthur CazauxCazaux – Stuart ParkerParker (7-61 6-4) – See score progression
- Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki – Paul JubbJubb (2-6 6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy (3-6 7-67 6-2) – See score progression
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Jirat NavasirisomboonNavasirisomboon (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Kacper ZukZuk – Evan FurnessFurness (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Nam Hoang LyHoang Ly – Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel (6-1 7-65) – See score progression
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – Kasidit SamrejSamrej (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Mats MoraingMoraing (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Yuttana CharoenphonCharoenphon (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Zdenek KolarKolar (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – Nam Hoang LyHoang Ly (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giovanni FonioFonio – Benjamin HassanHassan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kacper ZukZuk – Michael GeertsGeerts (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel MichalskiMichalski – Antoine EscoffierEscoffier (0-0) – H2H and prediction