Tim Van Rijthoven and Viktor Durasovic will face off in the 2nd round of the Bratislava Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 2:00 pm on CENTRE COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tim Van Rijthoven who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Tim Van Rijthoven is the pick to win this match.
Tim Van Rijthoven -> 1.17
Viktor Durasovic -> 4.8
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Tim Van Rijthoven vs. Viktor Durasovic
There is no head to head record between Tim Van Rijthoven and Viktor Durasovic since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Tim Van Rijthoven
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 0-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
2023 | 2-3 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 38-24 | 3-4 | 2-2 | 25-15 | 8-3 | 0-0 |
2021 | 37-22 | 13-7 | 7-6 | 16-8 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
2020 | 8-8 | 3-2 | 4-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 110, Van Rijthoven got to the 2nd round after beating Alexander Shevchenko 6-2 6-4.
In the 1st round, Van Rijthoven had a good straight sets win against Shevchenko (6-2 6-4). During the match, Van Rijthoven scored 64 points vs Shevchenko’s 48. The Dutch was very aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about the service games, Van Rijthoven bagged 7 aces and he was pretty steady in conceding no double faults. Overall, Tim Van Rijthoven was extremely effective on serve to win 86% (24/28) of his 1st serve and 60% (9/15) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Dutch broke Shevchenko 4 times after converting 33% of his break points (4/12).
Van Rijthoven has a solid match record in the last 9 years having won 63% of his matches (230-133). 24-13 on indoor hard courts in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Van Rijthoven has a compiled77-45 match record in the last 9 years on indoor hard courts.
His best result of the season was conquering the title in Hertogenbosch where he overcame Daniil Medvedev in the final 6-4 6-1.
Van Rijthoven has a composed 37-22 win-loss record in 2022, 24-13 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bratislava Challenger
Viktor Durasovic
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 48-33 | 19-10 | 15-15 | 14-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 25-37 | 5-8 | 17-18 | 2-9 | 0-1 | 1-1 |
2022 | 28-36 | 2-7 | 15-18 | 11-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 31-24 | 2-4 | 13-12 | 16-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 9-14 | 1-5 | 1-2 | 7-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 333, Viktor reached the 2nd round after beating Milos Karol 6-4 6-3, Martin Krumich 6-3 6-2 and Peter Benjamin Privara 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round, The Norwegian had a good straight sets win against Benjamin Privara (6-3 6-4). During the match Durasovic scored 61 points vs Benjamin Privara’s 41. Viktor was quite aggressive to blast 27 winners.
About the serving games, Durasovic made 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Viktor Durasovic was exceptionally effective on serve to win 84% (27/32) of his 1st serve and 73% (16/22) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Durasovic broke Benjamin Privara twice after converting 67% of his break points (2/3).
Durasovic’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in the Vilnus Challenger.
Viktor has a compiled 28-33 win-loss record in 2022, 11-9 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Van Rijthoven | Durasovic |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 3 |
Tot Set | 2 | 6 |
Tot Games | 18 | 55 |
Pts | 64-48 | 178-129 |
Total Points | 112 | 307 |
Winners | 24 | 77 |
%Winners | 38% | 43% |
Van Rijthoven played 1 match while Durasovic competed in 3 matches. Durasovic started his run from the qualifications while Van Rijthoven had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Van Rijthoven has played 4 set(s) less than Durasovic (2 vs 6). Therefore, Van Rijthoven played 37 games less than Durasovic. Van Rijthoven scored 24 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Viktor recorded 77 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Van Rijthoven | Durasovic |
---|---|---|
Aces | 7 | 15 |
Avg per match | 7 | 5 |
1st in | 28/43 | 97/160 |
%1st in | 65% | 61% |
1st pts | 24/28 | 77/97 |
%1st pts | 86% | 79% |
2nd pts | 9/15 | 43/63 |
%2nd pts | 60% | 68% |
Van Rijthoven made 7 aces . Durasovic struck 15 aces (5 per match). Van Rijthoven won 86% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 60% of the points. On the other side, Durasovic won 79% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 68% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Van Rijthoven | Durasovic |
---|---|---|
Won | 4 | 8 |
Converted | 4/12 | 8/14 |
% Converted | 33% | 57% |
Conceded | 1 | 4 |
Saved | 0 | 3 |
% Saved | 0% | 75% |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Tim broke his opponent 4 times with a 33% conversion rate. The Dutch dropped his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. Viktor broke his opponents 8 times with a 57% conversion rate. Durasovic conceded his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
Van Rijthoven | |||
R1 Shevchenko |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
pts | 64-48 | 64-48 | |
Total points | 112 | 112 | |
Winners | 24 | 24 | |
%Winners | 38% | 38% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 7 | 7 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
1st in | 28/43 | 28/43 | |
% 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
1st pts | 24/28 | 24/28 | |
% 1st pts | 86% | 86% | |
2nd pts | 9/15 | 9/15 | |
% 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/12 | 4/12 | |
Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Durasovic | |||||
Q1 Karol |
Q3 Krumich |
R1 Benjamin |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-3 | 6-3 6-2 | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 17 | 19 | 55 | |
pts | 62-50 | 55-38 | 61-41 | 178-129 | |
Total points | 112 | 93 | 102 | 307 | |
Winners | 22 | 28 | 27 | 77 | |
%Winners | 35% | 51% | 44% | 43% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 3 | 7 | 5 | 15 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |
1st in | 32/55 | 33/51 | 32/54 | 97/160 | |
% 1st in | 58% | 65% | 59% | 61% | |
1st pts | 22/32 | 28/33 | 27/32 | 77/97 | |
% 1st pts | 69% | 85% | 84% | 79% | |
2nd pts | 18/23 | 9/18 | 16/22 | 43/63 | |
% 2nd pts | 78% | 50% | 73% | 68% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 3 | 3 | 2 | 8 | |
Converted | 3/7 | 3/4 | 2/3 | 8/14 | |
Converted % | 43% | 75% | 67% | 57% | |
Conceded | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 | |
Saved | 2/3 | 0/0 | 1/1 | 3 | |
Saved % | 67% | – | 100% | 167% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Bratislava Challenger
- Tomas MachacMachac – Stefano TravagliaTravaglia (6-4 7-64) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Marton FucsovicsFucsovics – Yannick HanfmannHanfmann (6-2 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Liam BroadyBroady (4-6 7-63 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Illya MarchenkoMarchenko – Cem IlkelIlkel (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – Lukas KleinKlein (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Norbert GombosGombos – Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Marton FucsovicsFucsovics (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Viktor DurasovicDurasovic – Tim Van RijthovenVan Rijthoven (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – Jurij RodionovRodionov (0-0) – H2H and prediction