Michael Mmoh and Paul Jubb will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Charlottesville Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 1:00 pm on COURT 9. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Michael Mmoh who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Michael Mmoh is the pick to win this match.
Michael Mmoh -> 1.42
Paul Jubb -> 2.78
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Michael Mmoh vs. Paul Jubb
This will be the 2nd time that Michael Mmoh and Paul Jubb face off. The head to head is 1-0 for Mmoh (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they played each other, Mmoh won 6-2 0-0 ret. in the 1st round in the Fairfield Challenger back in October 2022.
Michael Mmoh
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 8-12 | 3-7 | 2-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-21 | 27-14 | 0-1 | 1-4 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 44-29 | 18-12 | 8-7 | 17-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 19-18 | 14-11 | 2-3 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 13-9 | 6-5 | 3-1 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 120, the American reached the 2nd round after defeating Ernesto Escobedo 7-65 7-5.
In the 1st round, Mmoh had a good straight sets win against Escobedo (7-65 7-5). During the match, Mmoh scored 89 points vs Escobedo’s 80. The American was extremely aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Regarding the service games, Mmoh blasted 6 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Michael Mmoh lost the serve 3 times and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Mmoh put 61% of his first serves in, winning 70% (31/44) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (14/28) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Escobedo 4 times after converting 33% of his break points (4/12).
Mmoh has favorable record in the last 10 years having won 58% of his matches (245-174). 10-5 on indoor hard courts in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Mmoh has a compiled 54-29 win-loss record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Mmoh’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in the Tallahassee Challenger,the Cary Challenger and the Fairfield Challenger.
The American has an aggregate 37-26 win-loss record in 2022, 10-5 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Charlottesville Challenger
Paul Jubb
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 47-27 | 26-13 | 0-2 | 12-7 | 9-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-13 | 19-9 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 32-26 | 7-9 | 10-4 | 12-8 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 51-13 | 48-10 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 220, Paul got to the 2nd round after defeating Aidan Mchugh 6-74 6-3 6-3.
In the 1st round against Mchugh, Jubb recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-74 6-3 6-3). During the match Jubb scored 118 points vs Mchugh’s 107. Jubb was very aggressive to blast 37 winners.
About the serving games, Jubb scored 4 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Paul Jubb lost the serve 3 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Jubb put 61% of his first serves in, winning 63% (37/59) of the points behind his 1st serve and 65% (24/37) on the 2nd serve. Paul broke Mchugh 6 times after converting 32% of his break points (6/19).
The Brit’s best result of the year was reaching the final in the Santa Cruz de la Sierra 2 Challenger.
Paul has a composed 29-23 win-loss record in 2022, 9-5 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Charlottesville Challenger
Paul has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Mmoh | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 25 | 31 |
| Pts | 89-80 | 118-107 |
| Total Points | 169 | 225 |
| Winners | 31 | 37 |
| %Winners | 35% | 31% |
Both Mmoh and Jubb played 1 match. At the moment, Paul Jubb surrendered 1 set while Michael Mmoh hasn’t conceded a set so far. Mmoh has played 1 set(s) less than Jubb (2 vs 3). Therefore, Mmoh played 6 games less than Jubb. The American scored 31 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, Jubb managed to score 37 winners (31%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Mmoh | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 4 |
| 1st in | 44/72 | 59/96 |
| %1st in | 61% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 31/44 | 37/59 |
| %1st pts | 70% | 63% |
| 2nd pts | 14/28 | 24/37 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 65% |
Mmoh blasted 6 aces . Jubb struck 4 aces . Mmoh won 70% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Jubb won 63% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 65% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Mmoh | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 6 |
| Converted | 4/12 | 6/19 |
| % Converted | 33% | 32% |
| Conceded | 5 | 6 |
| Saved | 2 | 3 |
| % Saved | 40% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
Mmoh broke his opponent 4 times with a 33% conversion rate. Mmoh dropped his serve 3 times and he saved 40% of the break points that he conceded. Jubb broke his opponent 6 times with a 32% conversion rate. Paul conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Mmoh | |||
| R1 Escobedo |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-65 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 25 | |
| pts | 89-80 | 89-80 | |
| Total points | 169 | 169 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 44/72 | 44/72 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 31/44 | 31/44 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/28 | 14/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/12 | 4/12 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 2/5 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 40% | 40% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Jubb | |||
| R1 Mchugh |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-74 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 118-107 | 118-107 | |
| Total points | 225 | 225 | |
| Winners | 37 | 37 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 31% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 59/96 | 59/96 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 37/59 | 37/59 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 63% | |
| 2nd pts | 24/37 | 24/37 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 65% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/19 | 6/19 | |
| Converted % | 32% | 32% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 3/6 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWWLLLLW
LLWLWWLWLL Tennis Scores in Charlottesville Challenger
- Emilio NavaNava – Nathan PonwithPonwith (5-7 6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Edan LeshemLeshem – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Lucas GerchGerch – Ethan QuinnQuinn (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Ulises BlanchBlanch – Nicolas MejiaMejia (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Denis KudlaKudla – Sebastian FanselowFanselow (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (7-5 0-6 7-61) – See score progression
- Aziz DougazDougaz – Zachary SvajdaSvajda (3-6 6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Paul JubbJubb – Aidan MchughMchugh (6-74 6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Ben SheltonShelton – Chris RodeschRodesch (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Brandon HoltHolt – Tennys SandgrenSandgren (6-1 3-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Juncheng ShangShang – Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich (6-4 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Facundo MenaMena – Murphy CassoneCassone (3-6 6-3 7-68) – See score progression
- Inaki Montes-De La TorreMontes-De La Torre – Alafia AyeniAyeni (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Michael MmohMmoh – Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo (7-65 7-5) – See score progression
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Nicolas Alvarez VaronaAlvarez Varona (6-1 7-63) – See score progression
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (6-3 7-69) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Denis KudlaKudla – Ulises BlanchBlanch (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo MenaMena – Emilio NavaNava (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Edan LeshemLeshem – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Aziz DougazDougaz (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lucas GerchGerch – Stefan KozlovKozlov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Paul JubbJubb – Michael MmohMmoh (0-1) – H2H and prediction
