Thiago Seyboth Wild and Colin Markes will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Guayaquil Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Tuesday at 12:30 pm on CANCHA 2. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Thiago Seyboth Wild who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Thiago Seyboth Wild is the pick to win this match.
Thiago Seyboth Wild -> 1.16
Colin Markes -> 4.7
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Thiago Seyboth Wild vs. Colin Markes
There is no head to head record between Thiago Seyboth Wild and Colin Markes since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 33-32 | 12-10 | 14-18 | 5-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
2023 | 61-23 | 1-1 | 56-16 | 2-5 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 21-27 | 3-5 | 18-21 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2021 | 26-32 | 7-6 | 18-23 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
2020 | 10-13 | 0-3 | 10-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 348, Seyboth Wild got to the qualifications after beating Federico Zeballos 7-64 6-1.
In the qualifications, Thiago had a good straight sets win against Zeballos (7-64 6-1). During the match, Seyboth Wild scored 81 points vs Zeballos’s 65. Seyboth Wild was quite aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Regarding the service games, Seyboth Wild recorded 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Thiago Seyboth Wild lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Seyboth Wild put 69% of his first serves in, winning 60% (27/45) of the points behind his 1st serve and 60% (12/20) on the 2nd serve. Seyboth Wild broke Zeballos 5 times after converting 36% of his break points (5/14).
Seyboth Wild has a winning match record in the last 6 years having won 54% of his matches (143-121). 14-18 on clay in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Seyboth Wild has a composed124-96 win-loss record in the last 6 years on clay.
Seyboth Wild has a composed 17-24 win-loss record in 2022, 14-18 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Guayaquil Challenger
Colin Markes
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 24-34 | 18-20 | 3-7 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 51-33 | 47-28 | 4-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 17-8 | 17-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 627 (career-high), Markes reached the qualifications after beating Karol Drzewiecki 6-4 4-6 7-62.
In the qualifications, Markes defeated Drzewiecki (6-4 4-6 7-62). During the match Markes scored 117 points vs Drzewiecki’s 112. Colin was extremely aggressive to blast 50 winners.
About the serving games, Markes recorded 3 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Colin Markes lost the serve 4 times and he saved 13 break points. Furthermore, Markes put 64% of his first serves in, winning 66% (50/76) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (20/42) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Drzewiecki 4 times after converting 25% of his break points (4/16).
Markes’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M15 Monastir.
Colin has a compiled 48-30 win-loss record in 2022, 4-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Guayaquil Challenger
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Seyboth Wild | Markes |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
Tot Games | 20 | 33 |
Pts | 81-65 | 117-112 |
Total Points | 146 | 229 |
Winners | 27 | 50 |
%Winners | 33% | 43% |
Both Seyboth Wild and Markes played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Colin Markes dropped 1 set while Thiago Seyboth Wild hasn’t dropped a set so far. Seyboth Wild has played 1 set(s) less than Markes (2 vs 3). Therefore, Seyboth Wild played 13 games less than Markes. Thiago scored 27 winners (33% of the total points). On the other side, The American made 50 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Seyboth Wild | Markes |
---|---|---|
Aces | 5 | 3 |
Avg per match | 5 | 3 |
1st in | 45/65 | 76/118 |
%1st in | 69% | 64% |
1st pts | 27/45 | 50/76 |
%1st pts | 60% | 66% |
2nd pts | 12/20 | 20/42 |
%2nd pts | 60% | 48% |
Seyboth Wild fired 5 aces . Markes scored 3 aces . Seyboth Wild won 60% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 60% of the points. On the other side, Markes won 66% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Seyboth Wild | Markes |
---|---|---|
Won | 5 | 4 |
Converted | 5/14 | 4/16 |
% Converted | 36% | 25% |
Conceded | 6 | 17 |
Saved | 4 | 13 |
% Saved | 67% | 76% |
Times Broken | 2 | 4 |
Seyboth Wild broke his opponent 5 times with a 36% conversion rate. Seyboth Wild surrendered his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Markes broke his opponent 4 times with a 25% conversion rate. Colin conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 76% of the break points that he conceded.
Seyboth Wild | |||
Q1 Zeballos |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-64 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
pts | 81-65 | 81-65 | |
Total points | 146 | 146 | |
Winners | 27 | 27 | |
%Winners | 33% | 33% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 5 | 5 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 45/65 | 45/65 | |
% 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
1st pts | 27/45 | 27/45 | |
% 1st pts | 60% | 60% | |
2nd pts | 12/20 | 12/20 | |
% 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/14 | 5/14 | |
Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Markes | |||
Q1 Drzewiecki |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 4-6 7-62 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 33 | 33 | |
pts | 117-112 | 117-112 | |
Total points | 229 | 229 | |
Winners | 50 | 50 | |
%Winners | 43% | 43% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 3 | 3 | |
Double Faults | 7 | 7 | |
1st in | 76/118 | 76/118 | |
% 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
1st pts | 50/76 | 50/76 | |
% 1st pts | 66% | 66% | |
2nd pts | 20/42 | 20/42 | |
% 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/16 | 4/16 | |
Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
Conceded | 17 | 17 | |
Saved | 13/17 | 13 | |
Saved % | 76% | 76% | |
Times Broken | 4 | 4 |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Roberto QuirozQuiroz – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Cayetano MarchMarch (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas KickerKicker – Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico CoriaCoria – Francisco ComesanaComesana (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Tomas Lipovsek PuchesLipovsek Puches (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nikola MilojevicMilojevic – Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hernan CasanovaCasanova – Jesper De JongDe Jong (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas AlvarezAlvarez – Eduardo RibeiroRibeiro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sumit NagalNagal – Daniel Dutra Da SilvaDutra Da Silva (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild – Colin MarkesMarkes (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo – Matheus Pucinelle De AlmeidaPucinelle De Almeida (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante – Miljan ZekicZekic (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo – Gerald MelzerMelzer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alvaro Guillen MezaGuillen Meza – Andres AndradeAndrade (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Max HoukesHoukes – (0-0) – H2H and prediction