Carlos Alcaraz and Botic Van De Zandschulp will play each other in the 2nd round of the Swiss Indoors Basel for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 7:00 pm on CENTRE COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Carlos Alcaraz who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Carlos Alcaraz is the pick to win this match.
Carlos Alcaraz -> 1.26
Botic Van De Zandschulp -> 3.85
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Carlos Alcaraz vs. Botic Van De Zandschulp
This will be the 2nd time that Carlos Alcaraz and Botic Van De Zandschulp square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Alcaraz (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they played, Alcaraz won 6-1 6-4 6-4 in the 1st round in at the Australian Open back in 2021.
Highlights Carlos Alcaraz vs Botic Van De Zandschulp – Australian Open 09-February-2021
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sFSPbEVhIqs
Carlos Alcaraz
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 52-11 | 22-5 | 17-4 | 5-1 | 8-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 65-12 | 26-6 | 25-3 | 2-3 | 12-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 57-13 | 21-4 | 27-4 | 6-4 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 48-19 | 15-8 | 22-7 | 10-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 39-7 | 10-0 | 29-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently world no. 1 Alcaraz got to the 2nd round after beating Jack Draper 3-6 6-2 7-5.
In the 1st round against Draper, Carlos recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-2 7-5). During the match, Alcaraz scored 89 points vs Draper’s 87. Carlos was very aggressive to blast 47 winners.
Regarding the service games, Alcaraz scored just 1 ace in the course of the match and he committed only 2 double faults. Carlos Alcaraz lost the serve 3 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Alcaraz put 77% of his first serves in, winning 67% (47/70) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (9/21) on the 2nd serve. Alcaraz broke Draper 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Alcaraz has a fantastic record in the last 5 years having won 77% of his matches (164-49). 2-2 on indoor hard courts in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Alcaraz has a compiled12-5 match record in the last 5 years on indoor hard courts.
His best result of the current season was winning the title in Rio de Janeiro where he beat Diego Schwartzman in the final 6-4 6-2 and in Miami where he defeated Casper Ruud in the final 7-5 6-4 and in Barcelona where he defeated Pablo Carreno-Busta in the final 6-3 6-2 and in Madrid where he beat Alexander Zverev in the final 6-3 6-1 and at the U.S. Open where he overcame Casper Ruud in the final 6-4 2-6 7-6(1) 6-3.
Alcaraz has an overall 53-11 win-loss record in 2022, 2-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Basel
The Spaniard has never competed in this tournament before.
Botic Van De Zandschulp
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 31-32 | 9-11 | 16-12 | 5-7 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-25 | 10-9 | 4-6 | 12-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-29 | 14-11 | 11-7 | 7-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 53-23 | 17-5 | 24-10 | 9-5 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 19-14 | 1-2 | 6-6 | 8-5 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
Ranked no. 35, the Dutch got to the 2nd round after defeating Adrian Mannarino 6-4 4-6 6-4.
In the 1st round, The Dutch defeated Mannarino (6-4 4-6 6-4).During the match Van De Zandschulp scored less points (3) than Mannarino. In fact, the world no. 1 won 104 points vs Mannarino’s. That means that Van De Zandschulp was more focused during the important points. The Dutch was extremely aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Talking about serving, Van De Zandschulp made 6 aces and he committed only 9 double faults. Botic Van De Zandschulp lost the serve 4 times and he saved 10 break points. Furthermore, Van De Zandschulp put 64% of his first serves in, winning 61% (41/67) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (17/38) on the 2nd serve. Botic broke Mannarino 5 times after converting 38% of his break points (5/13).
Botic’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in Munich.
Botic has an aggregate 38-26 win-loss record in 2022, 7-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Alcaraz | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 29 | 30 |
| Pts | 89-87 | 104-107 |
| Total Points | 176 | 211 |
| Winners | 47 | 41 |
| %Winners | 53% | 39% |
Both Alcaraz and Van De Zandschulp played 1 match. Both players lost a set in the event. Carlos Alcaraz dropped 1 set, while Botic Van De Zandschulp surrendered 1 set. Talking about their workload, Alcaraz and Van De Zandschulp have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Alcaraz played 1 game less than Van De Zandschulp. The Spaniard scored 47 winners (53% of the total points). On the other side, Van De Zandschulp struck 41 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Alcaraz | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 6 |
| 1st in | 70/91 | 67/105 |
| %1st in | 77% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 47/70 | 41/67 |
| %1st pts | 67% | 61% |
| 2nd pts | 9/21 | 17/38 |
| %2nd pts | 43% | 45% |
Alcaraz made 1 ace . Van De Zandschulp also blasted 6 aces . Alcaraz won 67% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 43% of the points. On the other side, Van De Zandschulp won 61% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 45% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Alcaraz | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 5 |
| Converted | 4/9 | 5/13 |
| % Converted | 44% | 38% |
| Conceded | 7 | 14 |
| Saved | 4 | 10 |
| % Saved | 57% | 71% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 4 |
Carlos broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Alcaraz lost his serve 3 times and he saved 57% of the break points that he conceded. Botic broke his opponent 5 times with a 38% conversion rate. Van De Zandschulp conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded.
| Alcaraz | |||
| R1 Draper |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-2 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 89-87 | 89-87 | |
| Total points | 176 | 176 | |
| Winners | 47 | 47 | |
| %Winners | 53% | 53% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 70/91 | 70/91 | |
| % 1st in | 77% | 77% | |
| 1st pts | 47/70 | 47/70 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/21 | 9/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 43% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 4/7 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 57% | 57% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Van De Zandschulp | |||
| R1 Mannarino |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 4-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
| pts | 104-107 | 104-107 | |
| Total points | 211 | 211 | |
| Winners | 41 | 41 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 9 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 67/105 | 67/105 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 41/67 | 41/67 | |
| % 1st pts | 61% | 61% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/38 | 17/38 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 45% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/13 | 5/13 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 14 | 14 | |
| Saved | 10/14 | 10 | |
| Saved % | 71% | 71% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWWWWWW
LLWWWLLWLW Tennis Scores in Basel
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Adrian MannarinoMannarino (6-4 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Dominic Stephan StrickerStephan Stricker – Maxime CressyCressy (7-64 6-3) – See score progression
- Alex MolcanMolcan – Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald (5-7 6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Stan WawrinkaWawrinka – Casper RuudRuud (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Andy MurrayMurray – Roman SafiullinSafiullin (6-75 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Marcelo Arevalo/Jean-Julien RojerArevalo/Jean-Julien Rojer – Lorenzo Musetti/Albert Ramos-VinolasMusetti/Albert Ramos-Vinolas (5-7 6-2 10-6) – See score progression
- Roberto Bautista AgutBautista Agut – Laslo DjereDjere (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic – Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina (6-75 6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Pablo Carreno-BustaCarreno-Busta – Sebastian BaezBaez (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Alexander BublikBublik – Aslan KaratsevKaratsev (6-3 7-62) – See score progression
- Maxime Cressy/Botic van de ZandschulpCressy/Botic van de Zandschulp – Marc-Andrea Huesler/Dominic Stephan StrickerHuesler/Dominic Stephan Stricker (6-74 7-610 12-10) – See score progression
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Marin CilicCilic (6-4 3-6 7-65) – See score progression
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – David GoffinGoffin (2-6 7-64 6-4) – See score progression
- Carlos AlcarazAlcaraz – Jack DraperDraper (3-6 6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic – Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina (6-7(5) 6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Roberto Bautista AgutBautista Agut – Laslo DjereDjere (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Roberto Bautista AgutBautista Agut – Andy MurrayMurray (2-3) – H2H and prediction
- Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas – Lorenzo MusettiMusetti (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alex MolcanMolcan – Arthur RinderknechRinderknech (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex De MinaurDe Minaur – Holger Vitus Nodskov RuneVitus Nodskov Rune (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Felix Auger AliassimeAuger Aliassime – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby – Ugo HumbertHumbert (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Stan WawrinkaWawrinka (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Carlos Alcaraz GarfiaAlcaraz Garfia – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (1-0) – H2H and prediction
