Christopher O Connell and Christopher Eubanks will play each other in the quarter of the Busan Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 11:00 am on COURT 1. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Christopher O Connell who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Christopher O Connell is the pick to win this match.
Christopher O Connell -> 1.79
Christopher Eubanks -> 1.98
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Christopher O Connell vs. Christopher Eubanks
There is no head to head record between Christopher O Connell and Christopher Eubanks since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Christopher O Connell
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 25-21 | 23-16 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 38-34 | 19-18 | 11-9 | 4-3 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
2022 | 50-25 | 30-16 | 12-5 | 3-1 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
2021 | 22-16 | 14-9 | 3-3 | 1-1 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
2020 | 12-12 | 4-5 | 4-3 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 107, the Australian got to the quarter after beating Mukund Sasikumar 6-4 6-2 and Ji Sung Nam 6-3 6-2.
In the 2nd round, Christopher had a good straight sets win against Sung Nam (6-3 6-2). During the match, O Connell scored 69 points vs Sung Nam’s 53. The Australian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about the service games, O Connell recorded 5 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Christopher O Connell was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 76% (25/33) of his 1st serve and 52% (12/23) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Christopher broke Sung Nam 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Australian hasn’t lost yet a set in this tournament to conquer 55% of the points he played.
O Connell has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 64% of his matches (311-176). 24-15 on hard in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, O Connell has a composed 130-84 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
O Connell’s best result of the season was getting to the final in the Split Challenger and the Porto Challenger.
The Australian has a compiled 41-23 win-loss record in 2022, 24-15 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Busan Challenger
O Connell has never competed in this tournament before.
Christopher Eubanks
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 19-25 | 11-11 | 0-7 | 4-2 | 4-5 | 0-0 |
2023 | 39-26 | 24-16 | 1-2 | 0-4 | 14-4 | 0-0 |
2022 | 43-26 | 24-16 | 1-2 | 14-6 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
2021 | 30-21 | 19-13 | 0-1 | 11-5 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
2020 | 13-8 | 12-6 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 146, the American reached the quarter after beating Naoki Nakagawa 6-0 6-3 and Kimmer Coppejans 7-62 6-3.
In the 2nd round, Eubanks had a good straight sets win against Coppejans (7-62 6-3). During the match Eubanks scored 78 points vs Coppejans’s 65. The American was pretty aggressive to blast 40 winners.
About the serving games, Eubanks bagged 9 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Christopher Eubanks conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 2 break points. Furthermore, Eubanks put 68% of his first serves in, winning 82% (40/49) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (11/23) on the 2nd serve. Eubanks broke Coppejans twice after converting 33% of his break points (2/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The American hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 58% of the points he played.
The American’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in the Gwangju Challenger.
Christopher has an overall 32-22 win-loss record in 2022, 24-15 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | O Connell | Eubanks |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 2 |
Tot Set | 4 | 4 |
Tot Games | 35 | 37 |
Pts | 133-108 | 137-100 |
Total Points | 241 | 237 |
Winners | 42 | 63 |
%Winners | 32% | 46% |
Both O Connell and Eubanks played 2 matches. Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, O Connell and Eubanks have played the same amount of sets 4. However, O Connell played 2 games less than Eubanks. Christopher scored 42 winners (32% of the total points). On the other side, Eubanks scored 63 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
Serve | O Connell | Eubanks |
---|---|---|
Aces | 12 | 17 |
Avg per match | 6 | 8.5 |
1st in | 58/110 | 79/116 |
%1st in | 53% | 68% |
1st pts | 42/58 | 63/79 |
%1st pts | 72% | 80% |
2nd pts | 28/52 | 21/37 |
%2nd pts | 54% | 57% |
O Connell made 12 aces (6 per match). Eubanks made 17 aces (8.5 per match). O Connell won 72% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Eubanks won 80% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | O Connell | Eubanks |
---|---|---|
Won | 9 | 6 |
Converted | 9/17 | 6/13 |
% Converted | 53% | 46% |
Conceded | 12 | 3 |
Saved | 9 | 3 |
% Saved | 75% | 100% |
Times Broken | 3 | 0 |
O Connell broke his opponents 9 times with a 53% conversion rate. Christopher lost his serve 3 times and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponents 6 times with a 46% conversion rate. Christopher was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 3 break points.
O Connell | ||||
R1 Kumar Mukund |
R2 Sung Nam |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-2 | 6-3 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 17 | 35 | |
pts | 64-55 | 69-53 | 133-108 | |
Total points | 119 | 122 | 241 | |
Winners | 17 | 25 | 42 | |
%Winners | 27% | 36% | 32% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 7 | 5 | 12 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
1st in | 25/54 | 33/56 | 58/110 | |
% 1st in | 46% | 59% | 53% | |
1st pts | 17/25 | 25/33 | 42/58 | |
% 1st pts | 68% | 76% | 72% | |
2nd pts | 16/29 | 12/23 | 28/52 | |
% 2nd pts | 55% | 52% | 54% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 5 | 4 | 9 | |
Converted | 5/10 | 4/7 | 9/17 | |
Converted % | 50% | 57% | 53% | |
Conceded | 7 | 5 | 12 | |
Saved | 5/7 | 4/5 | 9 | |
Saved % | 71% | 80% | 76% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 1 | 3 |
Eubanks | ||||
R1 Nakagawa |
R2 Coppejans |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-0 6-3 | 7-62 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Tot Games | 15 | 22 | 37 | |
pts | 59-35 | 78-65 | 137-100 | |
Total points | 94 | 143 | 237 | |
Winners | 23 | 40 | 63 | |
%Winners | 39% | 51% | 46% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 8 | 9 | 17 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
1st in | 30/44 | 49/72 | 79/116 | |
% 1st in | 68% | 68% | 68% | |
1st pts | 23/30 | 40/49 | 63/79 | |
% 1st pts | 77% | 82% | 80% | |
2nd pts | 10/14 | 11/23 | 21/37 | |
% 2nd pts | 71% | 48% | 57% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 4 | 2 | 6 | |
Converted | 4/7 | 2/6 | 6/13 | |
Converted % | 57% | 33% | 46% | |
Conceded | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
Saved | 1/1 | 2/2 | 3 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Busan Challenger
- Marc Polmans/Max PurcellPolmans/Max Purcell – Ruben Gonzales/Christopher RungkatGonzales/Christopher Rungkat (6-1 2-6 10-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Yunseong Chung/Aleksandar KovacevicChung/Aleksandar Kovacevic – Marek Gengel/Dalibor SvrcinaGengel/Dalibor Svrcina (w/o) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- John MillmanMillman – Seong Chan HongChan Hong (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Radu AlbotAlbot (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Christopher O ConnellO Connell (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Soon-Woo KwonKwon – Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak (0-0) – H2H and prediction