![Prediction And Head To Head Yanki Erel Vs. Jules Marie 4uoukrete8 Prediction and head to head Yanki Erel vs. Jules Marie](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Yanki-Erel-vs.-Jules-Marie-4UOukrETe8.jpg)
Yanki Erel and Jules Marie will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Vilnus Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 10:30 am on COURT 17. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jules Marie who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jules Marie is the pick to win this match.
Jules Marie -> 1.4
Yanki Erel -> 2.77
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Yanki Erel vs. Jules Marie
There is no head to head record between Yanki Erel and Jules Marie since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Yanki Erel
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 19-16 | 12-10 | 3-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 48-25 | 44-18 | 1-4 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 32-21 | 27-14 | 3-4 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 45-19 | 20-7 | 11-11 | 14-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 454, Yanki got to the qualifications after defeating Ivan Liutarevich 6-0 6-3.
In the qualifications, Erel had a good straight sets win against Liutarevich (6-0 6-3). During the match, Erel scored 56 points vs Liutarevich’s 30. Yanki was exceptionally aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Talking about the service games, Erel managed to score 6 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Yanki Erel was very effective on serve to win 81% (21/26) of his 1st serve and 75% (9/12) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Erel broke Liutarevich 5 times after converting 45% of his break points (5/11).
Erel has a winning record in the last 6 years having won 58% of his matches (88-65). 2-2 on indoor hard courts in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Erel has a composed18-4 win-loss record in the last 6 years on indoor hard courts.
Erel’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in M15 Monastir,M15 Antalya,M25 Chiang Rai and M25 Tbilisi.
The Turk has a composed 23-17 win-loss record in 2022, 2-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Vilnus Challenger
The Turk has never competed in this tournament before.
Jules Marie
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 20-19 | 13-11 | 4-4 | 3-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 66-27 | 42-13 | 6-5 | 18-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 35-23 | 10-7 | 12-8 | 13-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 8-1 | 0-0 | 5-0 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 492, Marie reached the qualifications after beating Clement Tabur 7-66 6-2.
In the qualifications, Marie had a good straight sets win against Tabur (7-66 6-2). During the match Marie scored 87 points vs Tabur’s 73. The French player was quite aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Talking about serving, Marie scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 2 double faults. Jules Marie lost the serve once and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Marie put 80% of his first serves in, winning 64% (35/55) of the points behind his 1st serve and 71% (10/14) on the 2nd serve. Jules broke Tabur 3 times after converting 25% of his break points (3/12).
Marie’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M25 Martos.
The French player has an overall 34-19 win-loss record in 2022, 12-5 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Erel | Marie |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 15 | 21 |
Pts | 56-30 | 87-73 |
Total Points | 86 | 160 |
Winners | 21 | 35 |
%Winners | 38% | 40% |
Both Erel and Marie played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Erel and Marie have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Erel played 6 games less than Marie. The Turk scored 21 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, The French player fired 35 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Erel | Marie |
---|---|---|
Aces | 6 | 1 |
Avg per match | 6 | 1 |
1st in | 26/38 | 55/69 |
%1st in | 68% | 80% |
1st pts | 21/26 | 35/55 |
%1st pts | 81% | 64% |
2nd pts | 9/12 | 10/14 |
%2nd pts | 75% | 71% |
Erel recorded 6 aces . Marie made 1 ace . Erel won 81% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 75% of the points. On the other side, Marie won 64% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 71% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Erel | Marie |
---|---|---|
Won | 5 | 3 |
Converted | 5/11 | 3/12 |
% Converted | 45% | 25% |
Conceded | 1 | 4 |
Saved | 0 | 3 |
% Saved | 0% | 75% |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Yanki broke his opponent 5 times with a 45% conversion rate. Yanki dropped his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. The French player broke his opponent 3 times with a 25% conversion rate. Jules conceded his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
Erel | |||
Q1 Liutarevich |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-0 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
pts | 56-30 | 56-30 | |
Total points | 86 | 86 | |
Winners | 21 | 21 | |
%Winners | 38% | 38% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 6 | 6 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 26/38 | 26/38 | |
% 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
1st pts | 21/26 | 21/26 | |
% 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
2nd pts | 9/12 | 9/12 | |
% 2nd pts | 75% | 75% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/11 | 5/11 | |
Converted % | 45% | 45% | |
Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Marie | |||
Q1 Tabur |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-66 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
pts | 87-73 | 87-73 | |
Total points | 160 | 160 | |
Winners | 35 | 35 | |
%Winners | 40% | 40% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 1 | 1 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 55/69 | 55/69 | |
% 1st in | 80% | 80% | |
1st pts | 35/55 | 35/55 | |
% 1st pts | 64% | 64% | |
2nd pts | 10/14 | 10/14 | |
% 2nd pts | 71% | 71% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/12 | 3/12 | |
Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mirza BasicBasic – Illya MarchenkoMarchenko (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jules MarieMarie – Yanki ErelErel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gianluca MagerMager – Maxime JanvierJanvier (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Laurent LokoliLokoli – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cem IlkelIlkel – Luca PotenzaPotenza (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Calvin HemeryHemery – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic – Stefano TravagliaTravaglia (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Johan NiklesNikles – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elliot BenchetritBenchetrit – Aldin SetkicSetkic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriel DecampsDecamps – Nerman FaticFatic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz – Khumoun SultanovSultanov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lukas KleinKlein – Alastair GrayGray (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mate ValkuszValkusz – Ernests GulbisGulbis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas MachacMachac – Viktor DurasovicDurasovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – David PoljakPoljak (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ainius SabaliauskasSabaliauskas – Richard BerankisBerankis (0-0) – H2H and prediction